https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Nagfor responds to the test case with "Error: pr97122.f90, line 14: Type T has
final subroutines but is not defined in the specification part of a module"
F2018:
"C787(R753) A final-subroutine-name shall be the name of a module procedure
with exactly one dummy argument."
Since, of necessity, the argument is declared to be of the derived type with
the final binding, the gfortran and nagfor errors are correct IMHO. ifort
compiles it without complaint.
I have marked this as "waiting" pending a contrary interpretation.
Cheers
Paul
