http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #37 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-08 15:46:48 UTC ---
> This is now done.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #35 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-08
15:13:45 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Feb 8 15:13:32 2013
New Revision: 195890
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195890
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54107
* t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #34 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-05
21:31:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Anything missing before this PR can be closed?
Unburying the patch for comment #4, testing it, committing it.
:-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #33 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-05 20:24:37 UTC ---
Anything missing before this PR can be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #32 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-04
18:34:41 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Feb 4 18:34:30 2013
New Revision: 195729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195729
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54107
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #31 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30 15:02:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> > ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27).
>
> Note that after revision 195562, the test in comment #4 an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-01-30 13:34:31 UTC ---
> ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27).
Note that after revision 195562, the test in comment #4 and its subsequent
modifications are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #29 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:45:56 UTC ---
r195562 fixes comment 0.
ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:40:55 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jan 29 21:40:51 2013
New Revision: 195562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195562
Log:
2013-01-29 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #27 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28 22:42:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> There is one case that remains to be handled. I suppose it is valid if the
> other are valid.
>
> function foo () result(bar)
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #26 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-28
19:46:01 UTC ---
Thanks for testing.
There is one case that remains to be handled. I suppose it is valid if the
other are valid.
function foo () result(bar)
procedure(foo), pointer ::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #25 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28 16:04:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> > Draft patch for comment #4, to be tested.
>
> Thanks! Seems to work on comment 4 at least. I'll try a regtest.
Regtest went through
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #24 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28 13:48:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created attachment 29294 [details]
> Draft patch for comment #4, to be tested.
Thanks! Seems to work on comment 4 at least. I'll try a r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-28
12:31:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29294
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29294
Draft patch for comment #4, to be tested.
As I said on @fortran, I don't think it's possibl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
17 matches
Mail list logo
