http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #31 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30 15:02:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > > ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27). > > Note that after revision 195562, the test in comment #4 and its subsequent > modifications are no longer "memory hogs" and now give the ICE in a fraction > of > second. Right. > Question: does the patch in comment #23 apply on top of r195562? Yes, it should.
