https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Benson 2012-02-06
04:14:15 UTC ---
I'll look forward to trying using class arrays again in my code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29
18:49:10 UTC ---
When fixed, correctness check should be added to test3() of the test case
submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00252.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-29
14:53:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 26505
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26505
This fixes the class_41 failure with the previous patch
This fixes the failure describe above but reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-29
14:51:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26504
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26504
This fixes the ice-on-valid of comment #0
This patch (extracted from PR50981 comment #28) fixes the I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-28
12:03:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Are the patches in comment #1 and #2 still supposed to fix it?
Those patches fix the ICE-on-invalid-code issue (segfault), i.e. the test case
in comment 0 w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-28
11:32:40 UTC ---
> The message is valid: one has to add the TARGET attribute to "self" or make
> "componentB" a POINTER. Doing so, one gets again the ICE in
> gfc_conv_descriptor_offset.
Confir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-28
09:21:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Trunk r183622 now gives
>BGet => self%componentB(1)
> Error: Pointer assignment target is neither TARGET nor POINTER at (1)
The message is valid: on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-27
22:15:48 UTC ---
Trunk r183622 now gives
pr51754.f90:19.15:
BGet => self%componentB(1)
1
Error: Pointer assignment target is neither TARGET nor POINTER at (1)
(r183618 g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-21
19:22:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
One additionally needs the following - otherwise, e.g., PR 41600 comment 1
fails at resolve time claiming that the type is not the same.
--- a/gcc/fortran/cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
14 matches
Mail list logo
