http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754

--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-28 
12:03:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Are the patches in comment #1 and #2 still supposed to fix it?

Those patches fix the ICE-on-invalid-code issue (segfault), i.e. the test case
in comment 0 without "allocatable".

It does not fix the ICE-on-valid-code issue of comment 0 (ICE in
gfc_conv_descriptor_offset), i.e. the test case of comment 0 with TARGET added.

Reply via email to