subject:"\[Bug fortran\/47844\] Array stride ignored for pointer\-valued function results"

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2012-06-29 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2012-02-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2011-10-08 10:18:56 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Oct 8 10:18:51 2011 New Revision: 179710 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179710 Log: 2011-10-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/47844

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-05 21:39:31 UTC --- > We could fix this in 4.7 by adding a sm field to array descriptors. I don't see why. I have looked at the dump.original of the following code: integer, target :: tgt(9) =

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-05 15:04:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > We could fix this in 4.7 by adding a sm field to array descriptors. > If we added the sm field after the dimension array, we would not > damage the exiting A

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-05 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-10-05 14:35:14 UTC --- Dear Tobias and Dominique, We could fix this in 4.7 by adding a sm field to array descriptors. If we added the sm field after the dimension array, we would not d

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

2011-10-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2011-10-05 10:21:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Still there on trunk at revision 179525 (I see it with 4.4.6, 4.5.3, and > 4.6.1). Note that for the test in comment #3, the line > > print *, ptr ! but