http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> 2011-10-05 14:35:14 UTC --- Dear Tobias and Dominique, We could fix this in 4.7 by adding a sm field to array descriptors. If we added the sm field after the dimension array, we would not damage the exiting API. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:20 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary|I/O: data transfer |Array stride ignored for > |statement: Array stride |pointer-valued function > |ignored for pointer-valued |results > |function results | > > --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-01 > 13:20:28 UTC --- > Does not only affect I/O but also assignment; cf. example below. > > integer, target :: tgt(5) = [1,2,3,4,5] > integer :: var(3) > var = f(tgt) ! should assign 1 3 5 > print *, ptr ! but prints 1 2 3 > contains > function f(x) > integer, target :: x(:) > integer, pointer :: f(:) > f => x(::2) > end function f > end > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
