--- Comment #14 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-21 14:12 ---
all fixed
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 21:46 ---
Can this PR be closed? I think all items are fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36932
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 12:47 ---
Subject: Bug 36932
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 20 12:46:43 2010
New Revision: 156926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156926
Log:
2010-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/36932
PR f
--- Comment #11 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-16 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #6)
>
> Joost,
>
> I held back from committing the patch this morning because I noticed that your
> testcase below is also calling pack/unpack like it is going out of b
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 09:04 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Joost,
I held back from committing the patch this morning because I noticed that your
testcase below is also calling pack/unpack like it is going out of business.
I have to confess that I
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-15 07:35 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> As soon as somebody gives me the green light, I'll apply the patch.
> The present version is attached.
the latest version works now without ICE. pack/unpack are down to about 1000
(down from 4
--- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-14 19:54 ---
Subject: Re: unneeded temporary (2x)
Joost,
This time I beat you to it :-)
Dominique's problems on fortran-dev are fixed by a test for the
array_spec, which also fixes this one.
As soon as somebod
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-14 19:27 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I had to exclude
> dummies but I now do not recall why. I'll look into it.
Hi Paul,
tested your patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-02/msg00106.html.
However, this ICEs with:
Progr
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 09:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> mv 'Build' to 'CC' , Paul, please see previous comment.
>
Joost,
You scared the life out of me when you said that it failed! I had to exclude
dummies but I now do not recall why. I'll lo
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-13 21:14 ---
mv 'Build' to 'CC' , Paul, please see previous comment.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-13 21:13 ---
testing Paul's patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-02/msg00093.html) on
CP2K it further halved the number of pack/unpacks. However, some cases still
unexpectedly resulted in a pack. A slightly modified version of t
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-10 08:57 ---
the patch for 41113 fixes one of the two warnings
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36932
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36932
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 13:05 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
14 matches
Mail list logo
