--- Comment #9 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 01:03
---
Subject: Bug 29315
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Fri Dec 1 01:01:21 2006
New Revision: 119392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119392
Log:
Merged revisions 118654-118785 via svnmerge from
svn+
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 07:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2. 4.1 will follow next weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 07:40 ---
Subject: Bug 29315
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 12 07:40:26 2006
New Revision: 118719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118719
Log:
2006-11-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/29
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 17:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29315
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 10 17:21:57 2006
New Revision: 118659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118659
Log:
2006-11-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/29
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-09 22:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29315
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00582.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-27 14:37 ---
I am sorry but I realised on looking at this again that the stride has nothing
to do with this one - the patch below regtests but has not been checked for
correct-in-all-cases logic. Since the original was incorrect,
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-10-02
08:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed, we don't set the stride correctly as far as I can tell.
This comes about because of the admitted kludge in the mechanism for passing
components of derived type array
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 03:07 ---
Confirmed, we don't set the stride correctly as far as I can tell.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 02:53 ---
I know I have seen a bug like this before.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29315
