------- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-10-02 08:09 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Confirmed, we don't set the stride correctly as far as I can tell.
This comes about because of the admitted kludge in the mechanism for passing components of derived type arrays. At line 1588 in trans-exp.c, you will find the comment: /* Returns a reference to a temporary array into which a component of an actual argument derived type array is copied and then returned after the function call. TODO Get rid of this kludge, when array descriptors are capable of handling aliased arrays. */ Maybe the time has come for byte size strides, although it will be a horrific job to implement. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29315
