--- Comment #11 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2006-01-30 23:24 ---
Subject: Re: problems with -Wformat and bit-fields
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:06, tony dot luck at intel dot com wrote:
> u64 den : 32, num : 32; /* numerator & denominator */
> printf("den=%lx num=%lx\
--- Comment #10 from tony dot luck at intel dot com 2006-01-24 00:06
---
Broken (again?) in 4.1
$ cat u.c
typedef unsigned long u64;
struct pal_freq_ratio {
u64 den : 32, num : 32; /* numerator & denominator */
} x;
main()
{
printf("den=%lx num=%lx\n", x.den, x.num);
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16
17:53 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16
16:04 ---
Subject: Bug 22421
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-16 16:04:38
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16
16:02 ---
Subject: Bug 22421
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-16 16:01:58
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-pretty-print.c
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 22:05
---
Testing a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-12
12:00 ---
Subject: Re: problems with -Wformat and bit-fields
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I don't know if I should mark this as a regression as this is really a
> progression as men
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
04:20 ---
As mentioned, just the text in the diagnostic is wong, not the diagnostic is
wrong.
I don't know if I should mark this as a regression as this is really a
progression as mentioned in
comment #2.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
04:18 ---
*** Bug 21962 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-12
02:03 ---
Subject: Re: New: problems with -Wformat and bit-fields
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> This problem showed up compiling the IA-64 linux kernel with gcc-4.0.1. There
> was an
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
01:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=9247)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9247&action=view)
31/32/33 bit-fields vs %u/%lu/%ld/%d printf formats
Compile on an LP64 machine (e.g. ia64-linux, x86_64-l
11 matches
Mail list logo
