------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-12 12:00 ------- Subject: Re: problems with -Wformat and bit-fields
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > I don't know if I should mark this as a regression as this is really a > progression as mentioned in > comment #2. The special case of 32-bit bit-fields is a regression, as they should be accepted where int is (most simply done by making bit-fields of the same width as int have type int / unsigned int; likewise for other standard types but with int / unsigned int taking precedence in the choice of types where multiple standard types have the same width). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22421
