https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
--- Comment #6 from newbie-02 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Glibc has strtof128 for this purpose.
think typo, strtoflt128 works better!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
--- Comment #5 from newbie-02 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> This bug database is still the wrong place for your questions.
>
> You probably need a newer glibc, strtof128 is relatively new.
:-)
Thank you, i'll not try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This bug database is still the wrong place for your questions.
You probably need a newer glibc, strtof128 is relatively new.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
--- Comment #3 from newbie-02 ---
strto**d**128 ... name collision with 'strtod128' for decimal128 types from
libdfp?? can't even say if that or something from glibc is called on my system.
It works, but I'd like to understand, to be able to te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
newbie-02 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from newbie-02 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
