[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #12 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- I filed PR117687 for the other cases.

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #11 from Joseph S. Myers --- This does not currently warn about zero of enum, bool or _BitInt type except in contexts where integer promotions result in bool being promoted to int before the diagnostic applies.

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #10 from Alejandro Colomar --- Do we warn about enum/_Bool (PR112556) with this? My computer with which I work with GCC is having a hardware failure and I can't use it until 3 weeks from now when a new piece arrives.

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc d

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #8 from Alejandro Colomar --- Several years don't buy us much. I think having it for 1 release will already make it better. Further than 1 release gives us not much value; especially if there's no release notes that say that it wil

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers --- How about the gnulib manywarnings module for a few years first, which would cover various gnulib-using projects that like a high level of warnings, and then consider -Wextra?

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #6 from Alejandro Colomar --- Hmm, okay, Wextra as a first step makes sense. How about one release in Wextra, and then move it to Wall? As for ISO C, I'm not sure if ISO is a good place to start the deprecation. I don't like ISO i

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #5 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- While I personally would like to have this warning in -Wall, and also want to see 0 as null pointer constant be deprecated, I think it is too early. At this time, it is not deprecated (I have a d

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #4 from Alejandro Colomar --- Since I would like to officially deprecate 0 as a null pointer constant, it would be good if we put it in -Wall. Does it make sense?

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:236c0829ee21a179c81b83f0d7f112ca23c47a4d commit r15-5191-g236c0829ee21a179c81b83f0d7f112ca23c47a4d Author: Martin Uecker Date: S

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from ue

[Bug c/117059] Enhancement: Make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant available in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org