https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #8 from Chanpreet Singh ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> You shouldn't read random blogs, but the standard of the language you are
> writing in.
> E.g. in n3797.pdf it is in [expr]/10:
> "Otherwise, the integral promo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #6 from Chanpreet Singh ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Chanpreet Singh from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > > For imull discussion see
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/que
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Chanpreet Singh from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > For imull discussion see
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42587607/why-is-imul-used-for-
> > multiplying-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #4 from Chanpreet Singh ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> For imull discussion see
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42587607/why-is-imul-used-for-
> multiplying-unsigned-numbers .
I understand that. However, can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For imull discussion see
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42587607/why-is-imul-used-for-multiplying-unsigned-numbers
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
--- Comment #2 from Chanpreet Singh ---
Can you please clarify a bit? In the above code, there are 3 vairable, c(int),
b(unsigned int) & a(int). The type of 'a*b' is expected to be (int) [same as
type of 'c', as also 'imull' instruction is used].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
