--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-28 11:03
---
Just for further reference: This was fixed by the patch for PR 9050.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 23:09 ---
Yep, fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #7 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-11-24 21:52 ---
Jason, is this PR related to your recent work on injecting class names into
scopes? I don't know what makes gcc reject the constructor specialization,
but it seems to me that it might be because it parses the X<> part of
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 15:38 ---
*** Bug 24848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
