------- Comment #7 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-11-24 21:52 -------
Jason, is this PR related to your recent work on injecting class names into
scopes? I don't know what makes gcc reject the constructor specialization,
but it seems to me that it might be because it parses the X<> part of
template X::X<> (T<2> &)
as a class name with an invalid template argument list, rather than as
the constructor name.
W.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6259
