[Bug rtl-optimization/56494] [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_truncation, at simplify-rtx.c:619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494 --- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2013-03-04 21:06:10 UTC --- "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > Created attachment 29578 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29578 > gcc48-p

[Bug tree-optimization/46309] optimization a==3||a==1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46309 --- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-10-31 22:36:48 UTC --- "eidletni at mail dot ru" writes: > Cool, thank you! +1, thanks Jakub

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 --- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-10-10 07:41:10 UTC --- Sorry for the breakage and thanks to Jakub for the fix. I agree UINTVAL is the right way to go FWIW.

[Bug rtl-optimization/54369] Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369 --- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 09:41:08 UTC --- "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: >> Looks good, thanks. Please go ahead. > > Thanks. On which branch(es)? Hmm, looks like this go

[Bug rtl-optimization/54369] Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369 --- Comment #7 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 08:16:23 UTC --- "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: >> Are you going to check this in on the mainline? > > Not without Richard's approval, so I&#

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #19 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 19:17:03 UTC --- "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 > 18:09:37 UTC --- > On SH an issue popped up because low

[Bug bootstrap/53249] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249 --- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 15:56:09 UTC --- "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" writes: > get_address_mode in dwarf2out.c works for this testcase. Yeah, that's what I was testing FWIW. If x3

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

--- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 09:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands "mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: > --- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 10:20 &g

[Bug driver/38864] Incorrect interaction between --with-arch=native and -mARCH

--- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2009-01-24 09:48 --- Subject: Re: Incorrect interaction between --with-arch=native and -mARCH "nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: > --- Comment #3 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 02:47 ---

[Bug target/28126] gcc moves an expensive instruction outside of a conditional

--- Comment #12 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2008-09-08 19:48 --- Subject: Re: gcc moves an expensive instruction outside of a conditional "daney at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can we close this now? > > I think it is fixed.