https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120502
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120465
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
N.B. the testcase here is a C++20 one, not related to xobj lambdas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119240
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 119378, which changed state.
Bug 119378 Summary: [12/13 Regression] Nested template class friend of template
class produces "internal compiler error: unexpected expression âTâ of kind
template_parm_index"
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|14.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120432
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> (In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #2)
> > But I think a better answer in this case is "because using
> > a volatile index *will not actually compile*, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120432
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #2)
> But I think a better answer in this case is "because using
> a volatile index *will not actually compile*, so flat_map shouldn't
> gratuitously advertise that s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118083
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.4|14.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119135
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112453
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] templated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: |[12 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115358
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115656
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] Templated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 118060, which changed state.
Bug 118060 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE (internal compiler error) on requires
clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116320
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: |[12 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120432
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120318
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Probably not very useful but here's a mechanically reduced testcase (fixed by
r16-504):
$ cat std.ii
module;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120318
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120366
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118031
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120320
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
or rather:
--- a/matrix.h
+++ b/matrix.h
@@ -1187,7 +1187,9 @@ struct storage_mul
Specialization for DenseMatrix * Matrix or Matrix * DenseMatrix or
SparseMatrix * Matrix or
Matrix * SparseMatrix. */
tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120320
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
The problem is the CNF/DNF of the constraints in
template
requires(DenseMatrix || DenseMatrix || SparseMatrix ||
SparseMatrix)
struct storage_mul
template
struct storage_mul
template
struct storage_mul
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15/16 Regression] |[14 Regression] Deduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117887
--- Comment #18 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
> r15-3530-gdfb63765e994be is listed as dependent, but is it? Can this be
> backported?
The patch applies cleanly, but unfortunately it doesn't help with this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120127
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in GCC when calling |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||catsith at me dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119305
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117035
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101670
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116440
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119807
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109655
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luc.grosheintz at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119998
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119427
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 119906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119906
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119888
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > And r15-3091-g51761c50f843d5 .
>
> Patrick, please take a look. I think the above commit caused this change i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119814
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119807
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[14/15 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119807
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 115639, which changed state.
Bug 115639 Summary: Large variations in compilation times involving
static_assert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> > ... and in particular if we have a cached mce_unknown call result it means
> > the call isn't sensitive to mce, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > > The second time around, we're not finding the call in
> > > co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115639
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119687
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119687
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #18 from Patrick Palka ---
I think I see what you mean -- for the instantiate_template (and possibly even
coerce_template_parms) call site, we could define and pass a new flag
tf_no_level_lowering instead of tf_partial to tell tsubst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #17 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> > Substituting into seems like a partial
> > substitution to me. If the lambda itself had any template parame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119668
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nlebedenko at hotmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
The GCC 13 gimple for the reduced testcase is:
;; Function void __static_initialization_and_destruction_0() (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
<>>) >;
<<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
<<< Unknown tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8)
> > Started with r14-9938, though I bet before this commit it only accidentally
> > worked.
>
> This failure does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
If we strengthen the comment #6 testcase with
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ concept tt = ;
template typename U>
concept is_specialization_of = tt;
template concept is_foo = is_specialization_of;
-auto ttt = is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
IMHO this shouldn't be considered a P1 as the testcase is quite contrived,
there's an easy workaround, and it (like other lambda in template argument
situations) likely only accidentally worked before.
On t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117849
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #12)
> I'm not sure this is quite right yet. This is on gcc trunk on compiler
> explorer right now, which is g++
> (Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-8fbe7d24373556d40886c7c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118249
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 118249, which changed state.
Bug 118249 Summary: Misdiagnosing use of 'this' while doing class member access
in constant evaluation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118249
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119652
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
FWIW it works if A is initialized via default-init or copy-list-init:
constinit A a{};// error
constinit A a; // OK
constinit A a = {}; // OK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118626
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|16.0|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119652
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.2.0, 15.0
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 1843 matches
Mail list logo