https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105440
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111471
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|13.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110025
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114138
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115159, which changed state.
Bug 115159 Summary: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at
cp/except.cc:1206 when using modules and QCoreApplication
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 111890, which changed state.
Bug 111890 Summary: ICE in tsubst_friend_function with friend function declared
inside a concept constrainted class inside a template class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 111890, which changed state.
Bug 111890 Summary: ICE in tsubst_friend_function with friend function declared
inside a concept constrainted class inside a template class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113386
Bug 113386 depends on bug 109203, which changed state.
Bug 109203 Summary: sort(zip(v1, v2)) fails to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109203
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111419
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109203
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE |[13 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118454
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105440
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115314
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
In PR117392, we lose track of the CTAD cast. I guess it's all ultimately
because of the early exit in maybe_convert_nontype_argument for auto parms?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115314
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118340
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118463
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 118463, which changed state.
Bug 118463 Summary: requires-clause considered ill-formed but not leading to
clause failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118463
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105220
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86883
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Another testcase (based off of the PR118454 testcase):
template using identity = T;
template struct A;
template
struct B {
template struct dual;
template
using ty1 = dual, Vs...>;
template
usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118454
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118454
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed, thanks for the bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116952
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.5.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118156
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118285
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-03
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107759
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107759
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 107759, which changed state.
Bug 107759 Summary: Implement C++23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107759
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 107758, which changed state.
Bug 107758 Summary: Implement C++23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107758
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107758
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103924
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
N.B. the other testcases in this PR are accepted by GCC 14 after r14-10134.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103924
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #5)
> Here's an even simpler testcase, rejected by GCC but accepted by Clang (with
> libstdc++):
Interesting, mind creating a separate PR for this? It could be a c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118245
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118190
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118069
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #13)
> This is not completely fixed.
>
> See
> - https://github.com/microsoft/STL/issues/3970#issuecomment-1681524306
> - https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/3fsdbTx5Y
I opened PR1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118185
Bug ID: 118185
Summary: ranges::clamp doesn't perfectly forward its projected
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117855
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118069
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118066
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118116
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118069
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|needs-bisec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112349
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > > I suspect for some reason we think the current instantiation d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117887
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117772
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100589
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ing.russomauro at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117560
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > Interesting, I guess 'auto x = *iter;' should never be done in generic code
> > then?
>
> Yap, even 'range_value_t x = *it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112569
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117504
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117530
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] Using |[12/13 Regression] Using a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117392
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104465
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
> which will have 𝒪(n) complexity in the case of random-access-sized but
> non-common range.
As mentioned in the commit message I think the ranges::next implementation is
O(n) only if the range is sized wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112349
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117224
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117054
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117174
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116876
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116710
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105766
Bug 105766 depends on bug 94894, which changed state.
Bug 94894 Summary: avoidable instantiation of conversion function template
during overload resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106201
Bug 106201 depends on bug 94894, which changed state.
Bug 94894 Summary: avoidable instantiation of conversion function template
during overload resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94894
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103884
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 103884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blubban at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107151
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70790
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117054
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-10-21 00:00:00 |2024-10-9
--- Comment #17 from Patrick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9)
> *** Bug 116897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
struct A {
int i = 42;
int foo() {
return [this](this auto &&self) { auto p = &i; retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||djnz00 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116897
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression]
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 116492, which changed state.
Bug 116492 Summary: inherited constructors with concept in subclass overrides
constructor in subclass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 1633 matches
Mail list logo