https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122112
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122127
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122070
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
N.B. __is_same/__is_convertible weren't strictly necessary, they're just a way
for the concept's template parameters to be considered used (which can be done
in a more trivial way via e.g. 'requires { typen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> So comment 0 is still a problem but only in C++20 mode.
Making the range adaptor closure objects perfect forwarding without deducing
this doesn't seem worth it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121917
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121795
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121917
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] Weird |[13/14 Regression] Weird
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121893
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121779
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121854
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when calling static |[15 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121795
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121804
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121804
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121779
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 109576, which changed state.
Bug 109576 Summary: access checking done on constexpr even if the access was
done in the class itself when used inside a template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109576
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109576
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 96716, which changed state.
Bug 96716 Summary: GCC reports "object is private" when it's accessed through
proper accessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=96
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression] Weird
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> This is a regression caused by the new concepts-based constructor
> constraints in gcc 12.
And the analogous std::tuple example started failing after r13-54 (w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121761
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dascandy at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121707
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 121707, which changed state.
Bug 121707 Summary: Compiler spills std::string internals when used in
consteval context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121707
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121705
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120618
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121646
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka ---
Still not fixed, the patch was for a related issue exposed by this one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121518
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121080
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121500
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121529
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 121351, which changed state.
Bug 121351 Summary: [15 Regression] Ambiguous resolution of constrained
overloads imported from base class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121351
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121351
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121335
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
I can't reproduce the std.cc ICE. Sometimes such ICEs happen when there's stale
stuff in the ./gcm.cache/ folder. Can you remove this folder and see if the
std.cc ICE still happens?
For the vulkan_first_tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119688
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Btw, a workaround for older GCC is to explicitly zero-initialize all
subobjects. In this particular testcase do ranges::fill(value, 0) in builder's
ctor for example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Btw, a workaround for older GCC is to explicitly zero-initialize all
subobjects. So in the original example, initialize A::data with say
{0,0,0,0,0,0}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119688
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99460
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120626
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119688
Bug 119688 depends on bug 94511, which changed state.
Bug 94511 Summary: User-defined type in non-type template parameter yields an
incorrect value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Bug 121231 depends on bug 94511, which changed state.
Bug 94511 Summary: User-defined type in non-type template parameter yields an
incorrect value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120626
Bug 120626 depends on bug 94511, which changed state.
Bug 94511 Summary: User-defined type in non-type template parameter yields an
incorrect value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99460
Bug 99460 depends on bug 94511, which changed state.
Bug 94511 Summary: User-defined type in non-type template parameter yields an
incorrect value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94511
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121335
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
i.e. place #includes first:
#define GLFW_INCLUDE_VULKAN
#include
import std;
import vulkan_hpp;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121335
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121402
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-05
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121351
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] |[15 Regression] Ambiguous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121351
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121351
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120757
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121328
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121327
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #3 from Patrick P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121327
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120224
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] ICE in |[14 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121238
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Confirmed, thanks for the short reproducer. Reducing via cvise..
My few attempts at reducing this testcase further via cvise resulted in
non-deterministically bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121245
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Note this relaxation only applies to container member functions.
InputIterator template parameter for _algorithms_ must be C++17 iterator as per
https://wg21.link/algorithms.requirements#4.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121245
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108080
--- Comment #19 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to ak from comment #18)
> How about just making it a warning and ignore? In most cases this is not
> fatal. The only exception would be options that are required for correctness.
>
> This patch f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121238
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Yep, both forms should work..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121239
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121239
Bug ID: 121239
Summary: mangling of non-dependent calls and operators that
resolve to an overload
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
It works if we explicitly zero-initialize 'result':
Foo result{0,0};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121055
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106610
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114632
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121179
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 121179, which changed state.
Bug 121179 Summary: When importing std, chrono calculation will cause a
compilation error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121179
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121055
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115209
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #7)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #4)
> > > > > Our concat_view implementation is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121026
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120934
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120934
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120934
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120766
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120789
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105611
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
std::shift_left/right require a Cpp17ForwardIterator, but here I is not default
constructible which seems like a constraint violation making the testcase
invalid?
Using ranges::next on a legacy iterator is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rush102333 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120748
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Started crashing (stack overflow) after r16-970.
... before which, we would instead reject the testcase, so not sure if this is
really a regression (rejects-vali
1 - 100 of 1975 matches
Mail list logo