https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117887
--- Comment #18 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) > r15-3530-gdfb63765e994be is listed as dependent, but is it? Can this be > backported? The patch applies cleanly, but unfortunately it doesn't help with this PR without r15-3530 (i.e. the full fix for PR116567), and r15-3530 is too risky to backport.