[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 --- Comment #24 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > The new testcase FAILs on the gcc-12 branch (it works on the 13 branch) on > x86_64-linux: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr117763.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times origi

[Bug fortran/103391] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r7-4021-g574284e9c49687d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug fortran/104130] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_class_array_ref, at fortran/class.c:274 since r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 f

[Bug fortran/105152] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:5647 since r9-5372-gbbf18dc5d248a79a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105152 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Well, "a few weeks" turned into rather longer than that. Apologies. Now fixed on 13-branch. This also fixes pr104130 by the way. Thanks Paul

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 60052 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60052&action=edit Fix for this PR Hi Harald, This version gets rid of the invalid reads. Originally it lost extra memory: defini

[Bug fortran/106692] [12/13/14 Regression] Cray pointer comparison wrongly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #19) > Fixed on mainline so far. > > Will wait some time before considering backports. Hi Harald, In spite of my nervousness about the patch, I wouldn't wait very long to b

[Bug fortran/105168] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_maybe_dereference_var, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2870 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/106692] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Cray pointer comparison wrongly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > This very local, hackish patch marks the Cray pointers as volatile only > for comparisons, fixes the testcase and does not regress with the analyzer > testcases. Not t

[Bug fortran/106692] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Cray pointer comparison wrongly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) . o we want to fix this, given Jakub and Tobias's remarks? > > I have no stock in Cray pointers. If there were a simple fix, then we > just do it. But the above doe

[Bug fortran/106692] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Cray pointer comparison wrongly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug fortran/116254] new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 118059, which changed state. Bug 118059 Summary: [15 Regression] ubsan instrumented gcc: valid value for type 'expr_t' in gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118059 What|

[Bug fortran/118059] [15 Regression] ubsan instrumented gcc: valid value for type 'expr_t' in gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118059 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/117797] [13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117797 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118059] [15 Regression] ubsan instrumented gcc: valid value for type 'expr_t' in gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118059 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/116254] new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59939 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59939&action=edit Fix for this PR (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #10) Hi Richard, The temporary array descriptor is

[Bug fortran/116254] new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/117897] [13/14 Regression] Bug in gfortran compiled windows run time with the latest release (14.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/116254] new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #10) > A bit more info: valgrind succeeds for -O0. But with optimisation enabled > (-O is enough), it flags: > > ==12989== Conditional jump or move depends on uni

[Bug fortran/110626] [13/14/15 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110626 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/84674] [12/13/14 Regression] Derived type name change makes a program segfault, removing non_overridable helps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/117897] [13/14 Regression] Bug in gfortran compiled windows run time with the latest release (14.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] Bug |[13/14 Regression] Bug in

[Bug fortran/117897] [13/14/15 Regression] Bug in gfortran compiled windows run time with the latest release (14.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59868 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59868&action=edit Fix for this PR It needs tidying up and the testcase dejagnu-ifying but it does regtest OK. I didn't realise th

[Bug fortran/117897] [13/14/15 Regression] Bug in gfortran compiled windows run time with the latest release (14.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/117897] [13/14/15 Regression] Bug in gfortran compiled windows run time with the latest release (14.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/117901] [15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/117797] [13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117797 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE |[13/14 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/84245] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in delete_root, at fortran/bbt.c:150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargls from comment #13) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12) > > Created attachment 59753 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > Testcase. Regressions tests OK. Will submit when my tree i

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59839 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59839&action=edit Instrumtented class_transformational_2.f90 Hi Christophe, Would you be so kind as to try compiling and running

[Bug fortran/117901] [15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59826 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59826&action=edit Fix for this PR Found it :-) It's just now regression testing. Paul

[Bug fortran/117901] [ 15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de, |

[Bug fortran/116261] [15 regression] gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 timeout since r15-2739-g4cb07a38233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/117901] [ 15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) ...snip... > I will now clean up the patch and produce a suitably reduced testcase that > isolates the problem. > > Paul This was my attempt at a testcase, which is

[Bug fortran/117901] [ 15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- I held off pushing because I had the scent of the problem. The "fix" of comment #3 was a dead giveaway. It turns out to be nothing to do with my fix for 102689 but is a latent bug exposed by the testcase. The

[Bug fortran/116261] [15 regression] gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 timeout since r15-2739-g4cb07a38233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/116261] [15 regression] gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 timeout since r15-2739-g4cb07a38233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116261 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59790 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59790&action=edit Fix for this PR

[Bug fortran/117901] [ 15 regression] class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/117901] New: class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901 Bug ID: 117901 Summary: class_transformational_1.f90 with -O3 and -fcheck=bounds gives ICE in make_ssa_name_fn Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED K

[Bug fortran/117797] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117797 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84245] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in delete_root, at fortran/bbt.c:150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/105054] [12/13/14 Regression] Using one kind of pointer functions causes the compiler to hang since r11-3029-g2b0df0a6ac79b34f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/78492] [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/29670] [meta-bug] fortran interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29670 Bug 29670 depends on bug 78492, which changed state. Bug 78492 Summary: [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in generic interface https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/117768] [15 regression] ICE in diagnostic_impl (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117768 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/117768] [15 regression] ICE in diagnostic_impl (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117768 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > Created attachment 59711 [details] > Fix for this PR Hi Juergen, Are you in a position to check this patch? I am submitting to the list in a few minutes but would

[Bug fortran/117768] [15 regression] ICE in diagnostic_impl (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117768 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17) > Thanks a lot, Paul!!! This also needs to be backported to the 14 branch, > right? Yes, it does. I am tied up with daytime work right now but will attend to it

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12) > > Created attachment 59694 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > Hi Juergen and Harald, > > > > Mea culpa once aga

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/117763] [15.0 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84869] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_len_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84869 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12 Regression] ICE in |

[Bug fortran/84869] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_len_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84869 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on all affected branches. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/117730] Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #6) > I looked at the fortran dump, and also at the verbose asm, comparing > with and w/o non_overridable. snip > Could that be related to child_reset being invoked, al

[Bug fortran/117730] Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- [pault@pc30 pr84674]$ valgrind ./a.out ==1167560== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==1167560== Copyright (C) 2002-2022, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==1167560== Using Valgrind-3.19.0 and LibVEX; re

[Bug fortran/84674] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Derived type name change makes a program segfault, removing non_overridable helps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/117730] New: Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730 Bug ID: 117730 Summary: Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84674] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Derived type name change makes a program segfault, removing non_overridable helps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Libavius from comment #4) > I got a bug, which I think is related to the one described here and wanted > to avoid opening another bug report. This bug is very different to PR84674 itself, which I

[Bug fortran/117730] Wrong code with non_overridable typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/115700] [12] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Summary|[12/13 regres

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 115700, which changed state. Bug 115700 Summary: [12] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 What|Removed |A

[Bug fortran/105054] [12/13/14 Regression] Using one kind of pointer functions causes the compiler to hang since r11-3029-g2b0df0a6ac79b34f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] Using

[Bug fortran/105054] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Using one kind of pointer functions causes the compiler to hang since r11-3029-g2b0df0a6ac79b34f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assign

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] |

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 regression] |[13/14 regression] |Fin

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assign

[Bug fortran/115070] [13 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/115348] [13 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14/15 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115348] [13 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 Regression] |-fchec

[Bug fortran/115070] [13 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE |[13 Regression] ICE using

[Bug fortran/117434] [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14/15 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/117430] gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/117430] New: gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430 Bug ID: 117430 Summary: gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/116040] [13 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 from r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cd ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/116040] [13 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 from r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cd ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 79685, which changed state. Bug 79685 Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/112459] gfortran -w option causes derived-type finalization at creation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 112459, which changed state. Bug 112459 Summary: gfortran -w option causes derived-type finalization at creation time https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459 What|Removed |A

[Bug fortran/115700] [12/13 regression] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #11) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159fb203231c503418e7ab9f45282957e40cb195 > > commit r15-4793-g159fb203231c503418e7a

[Bug fortran/115700] [12/13 regression] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug testsuite/117335] [15 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr115070.f90 from r15-4702-ged8ca972f88578 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com Re

[Bug testsuite/117335] [15 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr115070.f90 from r15-4702-ged8ca972f88578 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Last re

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE |[13/14 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/115348] [13/14 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] |-fc

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16) > Created attachment 58764 [details] > Fix for this PR > > Lot's of checking needed now: (i) To understand why this fix is necessary > here; and (ii) To see what els

[Bug fortran/84868] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/116078] [15 Regression] 10-12% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on AMD Zen2 since r15-2187-g838999bb23303e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116078 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > or rather the order of some operations for the arguments cause some other > missing optimizations. > > I doubt there is not much to be done from the front-end sid

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Working through J3/24-136r1 by Malcolm Cohen Subject: DIN-4: Generic processing of assumed-rank objects Date: 2024-June-24 1. Introduction "DIN-4 suggests "Allow generic processing of assumed-rank argum

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Before submission of the patch, will give consideration to Malcolm Cohen's https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/24-136r1.txt Paul

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59119|0 |1 is obsolete|

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >