https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > Created attachment 61214 [details] > Yet another fix for this PR > > I don't quite know whose patch is purer. This one also regtests OK. > > I will think about it while doing some gardening :-) > > Paul Any thoughts, Steve and Jerry? IMHO my patch addresses the specific problem directly and is unlikely to cause any regressions. Just my 10p's worth. Paul
