[Bug rtl-optimization/120469] [SH] Delay slot optimization opportunity missed with atomic writes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120469 --- Comment #2 from Paul Cercueil --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is by design, relaxed atomic stores on the rtl level are > modeled like volatile stores. And volatile stores are NOT put in delay slots > either. S

[Bug c/120469] New: [SH] Delay slot optimization opportunity missed with atomic writes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120469 Bug ID: 120469 Summary: [SH] Delay slot optimization opportunity missed with atomic writes Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/120209] [SH] Float constant -1.0 is loaded from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120209 --- Comment #2 from Paul Cercueil --- > The test case is somewhat bogus. Changing the "-1.0f" to "1.0f" will > generate the "fldi1" instruction for the comparison as well. Yes, I got confused while writing the bug report. The problem is loadin

[Bug target/120209] New: [SH] Float constant 1.0 is loaded from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120209 Bug ID: 120209 Summary: [SH] Float constant 1.0 is loaded from constant pool Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/115102] [SH] GCC misunderstands swap.b instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102 --- Comment #3 from Paul Cercueil --- Created attachment 58313 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58313&action=edit Proposed fix Attached is the proposed fix. Credits go to Oleg for the original solution.

[Bug target/115102] New: [SH] GCC misunderstands swap.b instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115102 Bug ID: 115102 Summary: [SH] GCC misunderstands swap.b instruction Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug c++/86879] G++ should warn about redundant tests for null pointers returned from functions with __attribute__((returns_nonnull))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86879 Paul Cercueil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul at crapouillou dot net --- Comment

[Bug target/109874] New: [SH] GCC 13's -Os code is 50% bigger than GCC 4's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109874 Bug ID: 109874 Summary: [SH] GCC 13's -Os code is 50% bigger than GCC 4's Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone