https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #9 from homgran ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > > AFAICT the ICE for the original test is as old as the first implementation
> > > of unlimited polymorphism.
> >
> > In that case, should we remove the '[4.9/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #7 from homgran ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> AFAICT the ICE for the original test is as old as the first implementation
> of unlimited polymorphism.
In that case, should we remove the '[4.9/5 Regression]'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #3 from homgran ---
Interesting... I've just tested Janus' reduced/modified version with "GNU
Fortran (GCC) 4.8.1 20130404 (prerelease)", and it does indeed compile cleanly.
However, my sample code ('test.f90', attached to the origina
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matt at gneilson dot plus.com
Created attachment 34732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34732&action=edit
Sample program that produces the ref
