https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #9 from homgran <matt at gneilson dot plus.com> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > > > AFAICT the ICE for the original test is as old as the first implementation > > > of unlimited polymorphism. > > > > In that case, should we remove the '[4.9/5 Regression]' tag from the > > summary title? > > Please don't do that. > > (1) The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 is a regression. Leave some > time to Janus to look at the problem: > > > > > The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 [...] > > > Started at r207986. > > > > Huh, that was me committing a patch for PR 60234. Guess I should take a look > > (but will probably not manage to do so before the weekend ...) > > (2) There are presently more than 800 open PRs, but less than 40 regressions > that can be fixed during stage 4. No problem, I was just checking. This is my first time using bugzilla, so I'm happy to just sit back and observe (perhaps making the occasional comment). I certainly don't want to get in anybody's way!
