[Bug ada/30806] execvp: gcc: Argument list too long

2007-02-15 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15 17:40 --- Hello Arno, I reported a few similar bugs to the PolyORB team long ago and we found the reason as well: Windows: --- gnat-mingw-gcc-4.2.0.log:checking the maximum length of command line

[Bug bootstrap/30727] Argument list to long when compiling gcc

2007-02-15 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #4 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15 15:00 --- Hello Andreas, If you say so I believe you. And it is not that important: I tried with gcc-4.2-20070207 and the problem did not appear again. Only now Ada fails with "Argument list to long&quo

[Bug ada/30806] New: execvp: gcc: Argument list too long

2007-02-15 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC build triplet: pentium4-pc-mingw32msv GCC host triplet: pentium4-pc-mingw32msv GCC target triplet: pentium4-pc-mingw32msv http://

[Bug ada/30804] index for "Buffer" may assume lower bound of 1

2007-02-15 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15 10:09 --- And exactly which older, working mingw version would you suggest if GNAT GPL 2006 (20060522-34) Copyright 1996-2006, Free Software Foundation, Inc. is not old enough. Martin -- krischik at users

[Bug ada/30803] warning: index for "X" may assume lower bound of 1

2007-02-15 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15 10:07 --- << and you should use a GNAT version older than the version you are building indeed. >> For Linux that would be OK - just use the compiler from the distribution. But for "pentium4-pc-

[Bug ada/30804] New: index for "Buffer" may assume lower bound of 1

2007-02-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
db:111:46: warning: suggested replacement: "Buffer'First + 19" krunch.adb:112:41: warning: index for "Buffer" may assume lower bound of 1 krunch.adb:112:41: warning: suggested replacement: "Buffer'First" krunch.adb:112:46: warning: index for "Buffer" may

[Bug bootstrap/30727] Argument list to long when compiling gcc

2007-02-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15 07:38 --- Hello Andrew Have you noticed all the '\' characters at the end of the lines quoted? It is not a small command line passed to gcc but one enormous command line passed to /bin/bash. Simpli

[Bug ada/30803] New: warning: index for "X" may assume lower bound of 1

2007-02-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
Summary: warning: index for "X" may assume lower bound of 1 Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot or

[Bug c/30727] New: Argument list to long when compiling gcc

2007-02-07 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
PM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26737 (%build) - Martin -- Summary: Argument list to long when compiling gcc Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/26810] error when building cross-compiler

2006-08-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #3 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-08-14 10:35 --- Problem also appears on mingw cross compiles: --build=i586-suse-linux --host=i586-suse-linux --target=mingw32 ... configure: Debug build flags set to -g3 -O0 checking for additional debug build... no

[Bug ada/26678] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" when compiling AWS.

2006-03-23 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #8 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-03-23 20:07 --- Hello Andrew, you are right - the hole of AWS compiles nicely with x86_64. Martin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678

[Bug debug/26827] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" on compile GPS 1.3.1/gtkada

2006-03-23 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-03-23 20:03 --- Hello, Tests on x86_64-suse-linux failed as well. Martin -- krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/26827] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" on compile GPS 1.3.1/gtkada

2006-03-23 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #1 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-03-23 15:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11105) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11105&action=view) All those GTK/Ada and GPS sources. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26827

[Bug ada/26827] New: "GNAT BUG DETECTED" on compile GPS 1.3.1/gtkada

2006-03-23 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC build triplet: i586-suse-linux

[Bug ada/26678] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" when compiling AWS.

2006-03-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #4 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-03-14 14:02 --- Hi Arnaud, The HEAD is indeed a typo - should have been release_2_1a. For head we have a different problem (bug:26162). As for the compiler, it is the unmodified release version: GNAT 4.1.0 gcc (GCC

[Bug ada/26678] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" when compiling AWS.

2006-03-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
-- krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678

[Bug ada/26678] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" when compiling AWS.

2006-03-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-03-14 13:45 --- Created an attachment (id=11047) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11047&action=view) The sources, concaternated and ziped. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678

[Bug ada/26678] New: "GNAT BUG DETECTED" when compiling AWS.

2006-03-14 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC build triplet: i586-suse-linux GCC host triplet: i586-suse-linux GCC

[Bug ada/26162] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" in AWS

2006-02-07 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #3 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-02-07 20:23 --- Sorry, allways forget. Here it comes: gcc -c -gnatwecfijkmruv -gnaty3abcefhiklmnoprstx -Wall -O2 -gnatn -I- -gnatA /work/act/AWS/src/aws-url.adb With Regards Martin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug ada/26162] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" in AWS

2006-02-07 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #1 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-02-07 17:51 --- Created an attachment (id=10797) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10797&action=view) The sources, concatternated and ziped up. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26162

[Bug ada/26162] New: "GNAT BUG DETECTED" in AWS

2006-02-07 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
edTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26162

[Bug ada/25885] gnatpp won't compile

2006-01-20 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-01-20 19:07 --- Almost forgot, you want a gcc -v >gcc -v Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet. Ziel: x86_64-suse-linux Konfiguriert mit: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --w

[Bug ada/25885] gnatpp won't compile

2006-01-20 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #1 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-01-20 19:04 --- Created an attachment (id=10691) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10691&action=view) The GNAT chop as whiched -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25885

[Bug ada/25885] New: gnatpp won't compile

2006-01-20 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25885

[Bug ada/19851] The new GNAT can't compile PolyORB

2005-02-10 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-02-10 10:20 --- (From update of attachment 8160) Mime type was not correctly determined. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/19851] The new GNAT can't compile PolyORB

2005-02-10 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-02-10 10:17 --- Hello Arno, I have added the sources, as you requested. I hope I got the gnatchop stuff right. I have tested the sources with the provided command and the error persists. Version: GNAT 4.0.0

[Bug ada/19851] The new GNAT can't compile PolyORB

2005-02-10 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-02-10 10:13 --- Created an attachment (id=8160) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8160&action=view) Source needed to recreate the bug. After seperating the source with gnatchop

[Bug ada/19851] The new GNAT can't compile PolyORB

2005-02-09 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-02-09 13:11 --- Just forgot to mention: It's the same for classic 32 bit Linux. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19851

[Bug ada/19851] New: The new GNAT can't compile PolyORB

2005-02-09 Thread krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net
t org ReportedBy: krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19851