[Bug modula2/113511] lack of libm2 ABI compatibility on powerpc platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113511 --- Comment #2 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > There's also the question on compatibility to libgm2 from GCC 13. indeed - I guess the -mabi could be retained for backward compatibility. > I suppose t

[Bug modula2/111956] [14 Regression] Many powerpc platforms do _not_ have support for IEEE754 long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956 --- Comment #16 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956 > > --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- > (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #14) >> Ah apol

[Bug modula2/112946] Assignment of string to enumeration or set crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946 --- Comment #5 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- many thanks for the bug report - all fixed in gcc master branch.

[Bug modula2/93575] the modula2 frontend fails to build with a profiled bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93575 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug modula2/102325] gm2 testsuite drivers should be unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325 > > Richard Biener changed: > >What|Removed |Added > -

[Bug modula2/102339] gm2 testsuite leaves many files behind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102339 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102339 > > Bug ID: 102339 >Summary: gm2 testsuite leaves many files behind >Product: gcc >

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 > > Bug ID: 102344 >Summary: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs >Product: gcc >

[Bug modula2/101388] Unconditional use of __MAX_BAUD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101388 --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley --- Many thanks - I've applied the patch to the git repro. Fixed now I believe.

[Bug modula2/102323] gm2 testsuite needs to be parallelized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102323 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- Confirmed, thank you for the bug report. Now fixed in the git repro.

[Bug modula2/102340] gm2 test sources shouldn't be executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102340 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug modula2/102339] gm2 testsuite leaves many files behind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102339 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- Confirmed as a bug and now fixed in the repository - many thanks for the report.

[Bug modula2/102325] gm2 testsuite drivers should be unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- Many thanks for reporting this bug/issue. I've now git pushed changes which have renamed all the gm2.exp driver scripts as distinct names.

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- moved file in the git repro branch and pushed.

[Bug modula2/102344] gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344 > > Bug ID: 102344 >Summary: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs >Product: gcc >

[Bug modula2/101389] Parallel build doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101389 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug modula2/101387] Unconditional use of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101387 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- many thanks for the bug report - now fixed in the git repro. The bugfix emits a prototype for throw (if required) rather than use a non portable header file.

[Bug modula2/101388] Unconditional use of __MAX_BAUD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101388 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101388 > > Bug ID: 101388 >Summary: Unconditional use of __MAX_BAUD >Product: gcc >

[Bug modula2/101391] Unresolved reference to module getopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- Thanks for mentioning the automake version discrepancy - which is also fixed in git using 1.15.1.

[Bug modula2/101259] error: the file containing the definition module 'getopt' cannot be found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101259 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- "doko at debian dot org" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101259 > > Matthias Klose changed: > >What|Removed |Added > -

[Bug modula2/101391] Unresolved reference to module getopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #