https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344

--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley <gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com> ---
"ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344
>
>             Bug ID: 102344
>            Summary: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs
>            Product: gcc
>            Version: 12.0
>             Status: UNCONFIRMED
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P3
>          Component: modula2
>           Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
>           Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>                 CC: gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
>   Target Milestone: ---
>
> The gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod test FAILs everywhere, it seems (seen on
> i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, both 32 and 64-bit):
>
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -g  
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -O  
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -O -g  
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -Os  
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
> FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
>
> The test is expected to FAIL, it seems, but actually compilation completes
> without error.  So this should actually be an XPASS instead.

yes indeed it should be XPASS - I'll move this into the pass directory.

regards,
Gaius

Reply via email to