[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #11 from Ignacy Gawędzki --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #10) > Could you try trunk or the 14.2 RC1? A bunch of IPA fixes landed. I tested with 162a1ed70303a031c81b0aaac499aaf394560390 and the problem is still there with van

[Bug ipa/115767] [12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 since r11-3308-gd119f34c952f87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #9 from Ignacy Gawędzki --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #8) > While we wait for Honza, Ignacy, if you could try reduce it to get rid of > the Boost dependency, it'd be appreciated. I'm struggling to get a minimal example. I

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #5 from Ignacy Gawędzki --- FWIW, I ran a git bisect from releases/gcc-10.5.0 to releases/gcc-11.1.0 and the first bad commit is d119f34c952f8718fdbabc63e2f369a16e92fa07, which adds modref/ipa_modref optimization passes.

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Ignacy Gawędzki changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64 x86_64 --- Comment #3 from Ig

[Bug target/115767] GCC looses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Ignacy Gawędzki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs at qult dot net --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/115767] New: GCC looses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Bug ID: 115767 Summary: GCC looses track of value on aarch64 with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta