https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118679
Bug ID: 118679
Summary: Missed optimization: inline functions, when operations
can be done with smaller bit width
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-28
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118679
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
On the trunk test1c and test2c are the only ones left and they are different
issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118680
Bug ID: 118680
Summary: (smaller_type)MAX_EXPR<(larger_type)a, (larger_type)b>
-> MAX_EXPR where smaller_type is the same as a/b
types and smaller/larger type have the same sign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102758
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -frename-registers fixes up the register allocation ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|rtl-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114991
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the testcase in comment #0 needs -fschedule-insns now to fail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114575
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102381
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||false-positive
--- Comment #4 from Sam Jame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102381
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-09-17 00:00:00 |2025-1-28
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108367
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't reproduce this starting in GCC 14.1.0. From the looks of it, it was a
patch to loop ch which "fixes" the ICE but that would mean this has gone
latent; just like how the patch which exposed this cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108367
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60306
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60306&action=edit
testcase for easier access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88575
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106992
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60305
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60305&action=edit
test.c
Just attaching the preprocessed godbolt testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 114559, which changed state.
Bug 114559 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] After function inlining some
optimizations missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114559
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114085
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114085
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:235215323c67d8ce021a00df0f42e2c1713c7959
commit r15-7242-g235215323c67d8ce021a00df0f42e2c1713c7959
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jan 27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also code size != relocation size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> `rep movsl` is smaller than `rep movsq`.
because movsq requires an extra prefix.
So this is definitely smaller.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Selected stringop expansion strategy: rep_4byte
;; args = *.LC10;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118678
Bug ID: 118678
Summary: Dubious optimization when compiling with -fpie -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118103
--- Comment #15 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #12)
>
> Hi Vineet,
>
> Could you please help to double check if below can help to resolve the cam4
> issue? Thanks and feel free to let me know if any help is required.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Another missed optimization:
long unsigned int _8;
...
_1 = _8 * 4;
if (_1 != 0)
goto ; [70.00%]
else
goto ; [30.00%]
[local count: 751619365]:
_2 = &data._M_elems + _1;
_304 = (long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118010
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676
--- Comment #4 from наб ---
Thanks, I'll put that in there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html doesn't seem to
indicate this change affects return values, either (it only says "passed").
I think static-linkage functions co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can turn off the note by -Wno-psabi .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note variant is an union underneath.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced:
```
union f
{
int a;
long double b;
};
f parse_from() {
return {};
}
```
the warning should mention return here rather than argument ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118632
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118632
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7f16806f3cc8011a3e1bbbf59389df65087f330
commit r15-7240-gc7f16806f3cc8011a3e1bbbf59389df65087f330
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60303|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
On the PowerPC side, it may be related to PR target/118541 where the IEEE
comparison operators (isgreater, etc.) can generate conditional moves that
involve instructions which will raise an error if one o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60302|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60301|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118677
Bug ID: 118677
Summary: Operator auto() requires () selects wrong overload
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note making ArrayRef constructor constexpr works around the issue ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60300|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676
Bug ID: 118676
Summary: Getting "the ABI of passing union with ‘long double’
has changed in GCC 4.4" warning for a function that
doesn't take long double and isn't subject to ABI at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118675
Bug ID: 118675
Summary: Missing escaping of "{" and "}" within messages in
SARIF output
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60299|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118663
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
>
> With the test case, rld_mode is SDmode and our
> secondary_memory_needed_mode(SDmode) returns DDmode for reasons described
> above. However, newly added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60299&action=edit
Semi reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118646
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118646
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vineet Gupta :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:019fe9c4d4c7cc9e325b5460d277ebaec108a838
commit r15-7239-g019fe9c4d4c7cc9e325b5460d277ebaec108a838
Author: Vineet Gupta
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118663
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #10)
> Similarly for -O2 -m64 -mcpu={power6,power5,power4,...}, LRA goes into a
> infinite loop.
Adding a little info for Vlad. The insn LRA is transforming is:
(in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
There is a bit more that can be done when the exponent is
known at compile time.
For example,
unsigned(kind=4) :: x
y = x**13u
could be translated as
if (x & 7 == 0) /* Check for divisibili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118674
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Summary|ICE: Segmentati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118674
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
the main issue can be shown by (still need includes for SmallVector/ArrayRef):
```
enum class Extension : unsigned {
SPV_KHR_integer_dot_product = 17
};
[[gnu::noinline]]
llvm::SmallVector, 1>
getIntegerDo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116073
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60272|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118674
Bug ID: 118674
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> The code crashing gfortran may actually be valid.
I set a breakpoint in parse.cc:7386
Breakpoint 1, gfc_parse_file () at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
mlir::spirv::getIntegerDotProductExtensions:
-TARGET_EXPR >>
- (const Extension &) &extension }>, ._M_len=1}> >>;
+TARGET_EXPR >>;
+const struct ArrayRef * D.1250733;
+<<< Un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60294&action=edit
005t.original-diff.xz (+ is bad)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60295&action=edit
006t.gimple-diff.xz (+ is bad)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
The difference is visible with `g++ IntegerDotProductOps.cpp.ii -Os
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -c`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
If I drop the prints I added to getIntegerDotProductCapabilities, the
difference goes back to:
```
│ Disassembly of section .text._ZN4mlir5spirv6SDotOp15getCapabilitiesEv:
│
│ :
│ mlir::spirv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Bug ID: 118673
Summary: [14/15 regression] LLVM's libMLIR miscompiled since
r14-1705-g2764335bd336f2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103284
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118663
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> extern void bar (void);
> void
> foo (_Decimal32 *dst, _Decimal32 src)
> {
> bar ();
> *dst = src;
> }
I'll note if I configure my gcc as a --target=powerp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103284
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-27
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117504
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
--- Comment #11 from Simon Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceabea405ffdc851736e240111be9b297ad86c53
commit r15-7238-gceabea405ffdc851736e240111be9b297ad86c53
Author: Simon Martin
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118672
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117173
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:006b4e45f3ab169a47146b31d9721c79098236ac
commit r15-7235-g006b4e45f3ab169a47146b31d9721c79098236ac
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118672
Bug ID: 118672
Summary: ICE on invalid template lambda expression
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116524
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d121d1e1dd874731a648086772e6c40e34fa5de9
commit r14-11251-gd121d1e1dd874731a648086772e6c40e34fa5de9
Author: Giuseppe D'An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118185
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d121d1e1dd874731a648086772e6c40e34fa5de9
commit r14-11251-gd121d1e1dd874731a648086772e6c40e34fa5de9
Author: Giuseppe D'Ang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0af8fc22338ef0dd09c9b469aafb19262aa8eeb9
commit r14-11250-g0af8fc22338ef0dd09c9b469aafb19262aa8eeb9
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110993
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9104472b645f76a212af9f9c58378500f9ba937e
commit r15-7234-g9104472b645f76a212af9f9c58378500f9ba937e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118661
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So the bug is in
else if (GET_CODE (inner) == MULT
&& CONST_INT_P (XEXP (inner, 1))
&& pos_rtx == 0 && pos == 0)
{
/* We're extracting the least significant bits of an rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Konstantinos Eleftheriou from comment #9)
> But, this isn't the case for AArch64 using ILP32, which isn't optimized at
> all.
We've just deprecated that, mind (doesn't negate that it could affect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 115769, which changed state.
Bug 115769 Summary: Implement CWG 2867 - Order of initialization for structured
bindings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115769
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116524
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d450dee7112635a541c5a34268d54f63da48f71
commit r15-7233-g9d450dee7112635a541c5a34268d54f63da48f71
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
make_compound_operation_int incorrectly turns
(ashiftrt:SI (ashift:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 107 [ a_5 ])
(const_int 3 [0x3]))
(const_int 31 [0x1f]))
(const_int 31 [0x1f]))
into
(mult:SI (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118662
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 27.01.2025 um 17:38 schrieb ubizjak at gmail dot com
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118662
>
> --- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> The testcase now generates (-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118671
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Comment #9 from Konstantinos Eleftheriou ---
This is optimized in x86 using -m32 during "combine", the problem is that the
test cases check for the optimization in GIMPLE. But, this isn't the case for
AArch64 using ILP32, which isn't optimiz
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
