[Bug target/118541] Incorrect transformation to xscmpgtdp for Unordered Operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541 --- Comment #1 from Jeevitha --- This issue arises from a glibc math function. Below is the discussion from the glibc mailing list conversation between Florian and Adhemerval. I saw this when building for POWER10 and it seems a compiler issue t

[Bug c/118541] New: Incorrect transformation to xscmpgtdp for Unordered Operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541 Bug ID: 118541 Summary: Incorrect transformation to xscmpgtdp for Unordered Operations Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/118539] Unsorted -march suggestions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118539 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/118466] Not removing bounds checking enough to vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118466 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/118539] Unsorted -march suggestions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118539 --- Comment #2 from Egor Pugin --- Does it make sense to sort them before printing? Seems people can just append new options without much grouping.

[Bug target/118540] New: RISC-V: ICE for unsupported target attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118540 Bug ID: 118540 Summary: RISC-V: ICE for unsupported target attribute Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug target/118539] Unsorted -march suggestions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118539 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug target/118539] New: Unsorted -march suggestions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118539 Bug ID: 118539 Summary: Unsorted -march suggestions Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Ass

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #16 from Julian Andres Klode --- Created attachment 60200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60200&action=edit Reduced to 55k The test case is now reduced to 55k bytes from 2.9M; attaching it if someone wants to lo

[Bug target/117688] [15 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code for .SAT_SUB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-17 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/118443] [Meta bug] Bugs triggered by and blocking more smtgcc testing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443 Bug 118443 depends on bug 117688, which changed state. Bug 117688 Summary: [15 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code for .SAT_SUB https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Note `-O3 -fdisable-tree-vrp2 -fdisable-tree-dom3` works.

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60199 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60199&action=edit Sligtly reduced

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #15 from Julian Andres Klode --- I have the answer(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > A few things to test out first: > Is it -fsanitize=address clean? I managed to recompile it with that option and annoyingly, that also

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #14 from Julian Andres Klode --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > >These may be related (do q31 and v31 overlap?) > > Q31 and V31 are the same register just different views into it. That is q31 > is the full 128bit vie

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- On the trunk for the cvise'd testcase I see: Req ={v} {CLOBBER(bob)}; MEM [(unsigned int *)&Req] = { 0, 0 }; Req.Result = 0; MEM [(long long unsigned int *)&Req + 376B] = { 0, 0 }; MEM [(long

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- A few things to test out first: Is it -fsanitize=address clean? Does -fno-lifetime-dse help? Does -fstack-reuse=none help? What about both together?

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- I think you should first report this to ubuntu since I can't reproduce it with all upstream sources of GCC, glibc.

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #7 from Disservin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Note on the trunk I get: > [apinski@xeond2 upstream-cross-aarch64]$ > QEMU_LD_PREFIX=./install/aarch64-linux-gnu/sysroot/ > ./install-qemu/bin/qemu-aarch64 a.out > t

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14/15 Regression] (20241102 -> 20241128) wrong initialization of member variable on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- >These may be related (do q31 and v31 overlap?) Q31 and V31 are the same register just different views into it. That is q31 is the full 128bit view while v31.4s is the 32bit x 4 element vector view of the

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note on the trunk I get: [apinski@xeond2 upstream-cross-aarch64]$ QEMU_LD_PREFIX=./install/aarch64-linux-gnu/sysroot/ ./install-qemu/bin/qemu-aarch64 a.out terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Miscompilation at -O0 on|throw not caught causing an

[Bug target/118538] throw not caught causing an seg fault rather than a `terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'` message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Miscompilation at -O0 on|throw not caught causing an

[Bug target/118538] Miscompilation at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #4 from Disservin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Does it matter if file exists or is this testing without file existing? This is without the file being present, if it is present then there's no segfault.

[Bug fortran/81978] Passing component of a parameter array to a subroutine causes SIGBUS crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81978 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 60198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60198&action=edit Draft patch This patch fixes the issue by preventing the write-back to read-only memory of the actua

[Bug target/118538] Miscompilation at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be an ubuntu specific issue because this is the first time we have a report about aarch64 seg faulting after a throw that was not caught.

[Bug target/118538] Miscompilation at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Does it matter if file exists or is this testing without file existing?

[Bug libfortran/118536] G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug target/118538] Miscompilation at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64 Summary|Miscompilati

[Bug libfortran/118536] G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca2681d45a45077010bcc5a4547450044bdd6d78 commit r15-7009-gca2681d45a45077010bcc5a4547450044bdd6d78 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug fortran/118499] Exponentiation of UNSIGNED is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #10 from Julian Andres Klode --- Created attachment 60197 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60197&action=edit Partially minimized by cvise to 48k lines I made it exit 42 because I could not insert an assert into t

[Bug target/118533] [15 regression] bfloat16_scalar_*.c failures since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118533 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/118067] [15 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1860 (unable to find a register to spill) {*lshrhi3_1} with -O -fno-split-wide-types -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118067 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f009e8865cda01310c52f7ec8bdaa3c557a2745 commit r15-7008-g9f009e8865cda01310c52f7ec8bdaa3c557a2745 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Keywords|needs-so

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/118538] New: Miscompilation on at -O0 on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118538 Bug ID: 118538 Summary: Miscompilation on at -O0 on ARM Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #4 from Julian Andres Klode --- I only have a huge ton of code so far, I can't minimize it easily, as it requires actually getting to the point where the constructor is called in the loop of the https downloader which happens _after_

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #8 from Julian Andres Klode --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > If you provide the preprocessed source a lot of the time we can do the rest > of getting a runtime Testcase and reducing it but we need the preprocessed >

[Bug gcov-profile/116743] [12/13/14/15 regression] Commit r12-5817-g3d9e6767939e96 causes ~10% perf regression w AutoFDO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116743 --- Comment #29 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eugene Rozenfeld : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d180e392d7a8ba1346bfe7580de953234f0c2f9d commit r12-10915-gd180e392d7a8ba1346bfe7580de953234f0c2f9d Author: Eugene Roz

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug middle-end/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug libfortran/118536] G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Could you give us preprocessed source for whichever TU was miscompiled please, and the command line used for it?

[Bug libfortran/118536] G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug c++/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/118536] G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch: diff --git a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c index 0177e052062..59871ac1982 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c +++ b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c @@ -2363,6 +2363,7

[Bug c++/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|

[Bug c++/118537] [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 --- Comment #1 from Julian Andres Klode --- Created attachment 60194 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60194&action=edit diff between the bad and good cc1plus versions Attaching the diff between the bad and good cc1plus versi

[Bug c++/118537] New: [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118537 Bug ID: 118537 Summary: [14 Regression; 20241102 -> 20241128] wrong initialization of member variable on Graviton [related to tree-slp-vectorize] Product: gcc Ve

[Bug libfortran/118536] New: G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118536 Bug ID: 118536 Summary: G formatted printing of UNSIGNED fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortra

[Bug fortran/106603] Problem with character(:), allocatable, intent(out) :: err for functions which return fixed arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106603 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug d/117115] [14/15 regression] ICE in expand_d_format when diagnosing an empty enum declaration since r14-4663-g964fd402c9b48e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117115 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug fortran/68152] ICE on declaring array result for function and entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68152 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug d/117115] [14/15 regression] ICE in expand_d_format when diagnosing an empty enum declaration since r14-4663-g964fd402c9b48e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117115 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4abeaeba435054ad0ab59cf570620b37c06ffcc4 commit r14-11223-g4abeaeba435054ad0ab59cf570620b37c06ffcc4 Author: Iain Buclaw Dat

[Bug fortran/106005] (F2023) Support for REDUCE clause in DO CONCURRENT loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106005 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug d/117115] [14/15 regression] ICE in expand_d_format when diagnosing an empty enum declaration since r14-4663-g964fd402c9b48e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117115 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:975c4f1a5de4ede89ee9499cd1a73d613a4aeae4 commit r15-7006-g975c4f1a5de4ede89ee9499cd1a73d613a4aeae4 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Fri J

[Bug fortran/118499] Exponentiation of UNSIGNED is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 --- Comment #18 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 1/17/25 10:17, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 > > --- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > > As it is not clear what is th

[Bug fortran/118359] -fc-prototypes is incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118359 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/110076] ICE on mutually recursive derived types.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110076 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/118511] [15 Regression] ICE when compiling s390-tools since r15-2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118511 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/118514] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,s,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-6360-g6d5df5133c5dd8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118514 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Interesting. Without ifcombine, we optimize the loop body to the same, but the load from b doesn't get pulled out to the loop header. I suppose ifcombine may need to propagate some annotation that the lo

[Bug target/118511] [15 Regression] ICE when compiling s390-tools since r15-2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118511 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71280df05f28fd568f8b863dd700c0be2f2443a8 commit r15-7005-g71280df05f28fd568f8b863dd700c0be2f2443a8 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug fortran/107362] Internal compiler error for recursive class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107362 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from

[Bug target/118119] [15 regression] RISC-V: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-24.c zvl256b failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118119 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/118460] [14/15 Regression] ICE on armv8.1-m.main with -mfloat-abi=hard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118460 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Yes, that would work as a work-around. It's a bit of a hack though. The expectation is that we would use vsel for pretty much everything when it is available (particularly for fast-math), but we fail to

[Bug c++/118534] [15 Regression] constant evaluation failure with RAW_DATA_CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/118499] Exponentiation of UNSIGNED is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 --- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- A type promotion or conversion for binary operations is a real issue. While it is feasible, we should step back and draw a line what is more or less consistent with the spirit of the UNSIGNED pro

[Bug c++/118513] ICE with modules and structured binding using std::tuple*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118513 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #4) > Confirmed. Without having looked into it too much I think maybe doing > `varpool_node::finalize_decl` might be the way to go to cover this and any > other rel

[Bug target/117688] [15 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code for .SAT_SUB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688 Alexey Merzlyakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexey.merzlyakov at samsung dot c

[Bug ipa/118535] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118535 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/118535] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{2, 3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118535 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/118535] New: wrong code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 15.0.1 20250117 (experimental) (GCC) [560] % [560] % gcctk -O2 small.c [561] % ./a.out Aborted [562] % [562] % cat small.c int a, b, c, d, e, f, *g = &b; static i

[Bug c++/118534] [15 Regression] constant evaluation failure with RAW_DATA_CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118534 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/117424] [12/13/14/15 regression] Miscompile with different optimization flags since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117424 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2024-11-03 00:00:00 |2025-1-17 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --

[Bug target/118460] [14/15 Regression] ICE on armv8.1-m.main with -mfloat-abi=hard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118460 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/118499] Exponentiation of UNSIGNED is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 --- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 1/17/25 03:47, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499 > > --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- > (In reply to kargls from comment #14) >> (

[Bug c++/118534] [15 Regression] constant evaluation failure with RAW_DATA_CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/118534] New: [15 Regression] constant evaluation failure with RAW_DATA_CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118534 Bug ID: 118534 Summary: [15 Regression] constant evaluation failure with RAW_DATA_CST Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/118527] When a loop is unlooped due to sccvn, its profile is not updated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118527 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- The reason why I did not implement profile fixups to cfgcleanup is that you can not really fix the profile without knowing why it became inconsistent. Consider situation where we have function foo (int a) {

[Bug target/118460] [14/15 Regression] ICE on armv8.1-m.main with -mfloat-abi=hard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118460 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- arm_vsel_comparison_operator is rejecting the comparison (LT) because it is not one that the vsel instruction can handle. We should be reversing the order of operands to the compare instruction and then

[Bug target/118512] [15 regression] Failed bootstrap on sparc (Error: Hardware capability "vis3b" not enabled for "fpcmpule8".)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118512 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/118512] [15 regression] Failed bootstrap on sparc (Error: Hardware capability "vis3b" not enabled for "fpcmpule8".)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118512 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Thanks. IMO where is the truth is not very clear, but I don't think that we want to change the assembler at this point, so let's take it as the truth.

[Bug target/118533] [15 regression] bfloat16_scalar_*.c failures since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/118514] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,s,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-6360-g6d5df5133c5dd8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118514 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/118532] [15 Regression] add_list_candidates not handling RAW_DATA_CST right

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118532 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-01-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/118528] [15 Regression] Template argument deduction failure with RAW_DATA_CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118528 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/118533] New: [15 regression] bfloat16_scalar_*.c failures since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118533 Bug ID: 118533 Summary: [15 regression] bfloat16_scalar_*.c failures since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/118532] [15 Regression] add_list_candidates not handling RAW_DATA_CST right

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118532 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/118532] New: [15 Regression] add_list_candidates not handling RAW_DATA_CST right

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118532 Bug ID: 118532 Summary: [15 Regression] add_list_candidates not handling RAW_DATA_CST right Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/118529] [15 regression] ICE when building openssl-3.3.2 on sparc (in operator[], at vec.h:910)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 > > > > --- Comment #5 from Tamar Chris

[Bug c++/118530] [OpenMP] declare_variant - non-arg variant with non-template return value type not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118530 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||112810 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnu

[Bug tree-optimization/118529] [15 regression] ICE when building openssl-3.3.2 on sparc (in operator[], at vec.h:910)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 > > --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comm

[Bug tree-optimization/118529] [15 regression] ICE when building openssl-3.3.2 on sparc (in operator[], at vec.h:910)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Confirmed. > OTOH the initial choice of mask mode for the compare by the vectorizer > is a bit odd. We get there from vect_recog_bool_pattern handling > >

[Bug target/117013] aarch64 should define spaceship4 optab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117013 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Richar

[Bug target/118329] avr defines __int24 but doesn't define __GLIBCXX_TYPE_INT_N_0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118329 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|14.3 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Joha

[Bug target/118329] avr defines __int24 but doesn't define __GLIBCXX_TYPE_INT_N_0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118329 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ba0d18323f4ddacc3dfd218287b7904f80034fe commit r14-11222-g1ba0d18323f4ddacc3dfd218287b7904f80034fe Author: Georg-Joha

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 --- Comment #24 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > The new testcase FAILs on the gcc-12 branch (it works on the 13 branch) on > x86_64-linux: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr117763.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times origi

[Bug tree-optimization/118529] [15 regression] ICE when building openssl-3.3.2 on sparc (in operator[], at vec.h:910)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118529 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 110870, which changed state. Bug 110870 Summary: g++ internal compiler error on modules with precompiled headerfile "string" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110870 What|Removed

  1   2   3   >