https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118204
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Note that for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-
> fsanitize-trap, we already document the incompatibility with vptr:
> > Curre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118204
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > c++abi, or linking error
>
> What does that mean? Is it because for clang, msvc abi can be used and it is
> incompatible there?
>
>
> It is not obvious. How
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> c++abi, or linking error
What does that mean? Is it because for clang, msvc abi can be used and it is
incompatible there?
It is not obvious. How i wish the explanation would be easier to understand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118204
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Note that for
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-fsanitize-trap,
we already document the incompatibility with vptr:
> Currently this feature works with -fsanitize=undefined (an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118204
Bug ID: 118204
Summary: Clang is dropping -fsanitize=vptr from default
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118202
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
At first I thought it was related to PR 86439 but this ICEs also in GCC 11
while that added perform_dguide_overload_resolution for GCC 12. So it must be
some other change that happened beforehand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-26
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-10-07 00:00:00 |2024-12-26
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118203
Bug ID: 118203
Summary: Redefined 'Image (with Put_Image aspect) causes
STORAGE_ERROR when in a case expression
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118168
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59976|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 59975 [details]
> > cvise-reduced.ii
> >
> > Attached cvise output as I hadn't cancelled it ear
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59976&action=edit
Reduced further from 59975
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59975
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59975&action=edit
cvise-reduced.ii
Attached cvise output as I hadn't cancelled it earlier, pinskia's is smaller
though (just figured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118102
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
Yes. I can't promise to spend that long on it, but I will try reproduce it and
go from there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(In rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115459
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0dae4da4c45e3959b0624551f80283c45a60446
commit r15-6440-ge0dae4da4c45e3959b0624551f80283c45a60446
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115459
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:524fedd7f658f9c57e5f230f21cadf406c5d5011
commit r15-6439-g524fedd7f658f9c57e5f230f21cadf406c5d5011
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115459
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2984a3fac3d6b98e2cd6d7ee1c701159be86af78
commit r15-6438-g2984a3fac3d6b98e2cd6d7ee1c701159be86af78
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #7 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Summary|[15 reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59974
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59974&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118102
--- Comment #16 from ganime ---
sending private messages to sjames direct mail works?
i want clear out some specific commands private over personal message
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118102
>
> --- Comment #15 from Sam Jam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118166
--- Comment #4 from Gero ---
Changing the register sets is of course a problem. But u/int128 could also be
realized in xmm ?
- Addition/subtraction can be implemented efficiently (see attachemant).
- For multiplications/shl/shr/... this should a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118166
--- Comment #3 from Gero ---
Created attachment 59973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59973&action=edit
addsub_128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think a libstdc++ change exposed this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59972&action=edit
Reduced unincluded testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118202
Bug ID: 118202
Summary: ICE segmentation fault when instantiating a derived
template class with default template argument and
special overloaded ctor
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118202
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Summary|ICE segmentation fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118193
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I assumed based on the function name that it'd be ice-checking but it appears
not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118201
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118192
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #1 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118193
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in verify_ctor_sanity, |[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118201
Bug ID: 118201
Summary: ICE: in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at
cp/method.cc:3143
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118200
Bug ID: 118200
Summary: note_simd_array_uses crashes in SIMT region with
offloading to nvptx
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59971
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59971&action=edit
addons.cc.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Bug ID: 118199
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building widelands-1.2.1
(with -fno-elide-constructors)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191
--- Comment #3 from newbie-02 ---
strto**d**128 ... name collision with 'strtod128' for decimal128 types from
libdfp?? can't even say if that or something from glibc is called on my system.
It works, but I'd like to understand, to be able to te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113149
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
43 matches
Mail list logo
