https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118070
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #32 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111619
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Bug 84402 depends on bug 116146, which changed state.
Bug 116146 Summary: Split insn-recog.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116146
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116146
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118101
--- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Is valid? In that the specialization of A (imported via module B) after
> the use in B.
No, I've probably reduced it too far. But I can make it valid (I beli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118101
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is valid? In that the specialization of A (imported via module B) after the
use in B.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead ---
The backtrace seems to indicate failure happens in the memcpy here:
#if MAPPED_WRITING
/* HDR is always mapped. */
if (&buffer != &hdr)
{
bytes_out out (this);
grow (out, buffer.pos,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118101
Bug ID: 118101
Summary: [modules] ICE: canonical types differ for identical
types
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118095
--- Comment #4 from Kees Cook ---
I've added Martin to CC. :) Martin, you wrote this code originally; do you have
a moment to look at how this might best be solved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118095
--- Comment #3 from Kees Cook ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #1)
> I think you may also need to adapt get_attr_nonstring_decl
How do I walk "up" a tree to see if it is part of a multidimensional array? I
don't understand what is happening
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118100
Bug ID: 118100
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Segment Fault by rvv intrinsic
compilation at `-O2` and `-O3`.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well the reduced testcase is undefined:
void func_2(int *) {
long __trans_tmp_5;
int *l_1710 = &g_90;
func_2___trans_tmp_4 = 7 - (__trans_tmp_5 >= g_90) - 33;
__trans_tmp_5 is not set.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118098
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure there is a dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118098
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88aa69f8126db9a2d5f93b5c6c54cc01d21d1c6e
commit r15-6315-g88aa69f8126db9a2d5f93b5c6c54cc01d21d1c6e
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Tue D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I get a clean sweep on x86_64_linux_gnu. I will try some jerry-code to see if I
can break it. If anyone else has comments, chime in. I think you submit to
the list Steve.
atch.
On x86_64-*-freebsd, I have
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes71796
# of unexpected failures24
# of expected failures 274
# of unsupported tests 87
/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 15.0.0 20241217
(experimental) (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118046
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117915
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118025
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
... ditto the original. So maybe fixed already?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> Reduced C code:
>
Both locally and on godbolt, I see the same output for -O0 and -O3 for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118075
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan ---
Ack and reproduced.
Take a rough look it should be the strided store for memory alias because
disable the sch can fix it.
I will take care of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118095
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
--- Comment #8 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #7)
> Created attachment 59903 [details]
> Complete patch with testcase included
>
> The new diff is a complete implementation with an included testcase.
Forgot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118057
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118099
Bug ID: 118099
Summary: basic_filebuf::overflow is left inconsistent on I/O
error.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59827|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code:
void printf(...);
int crc32_tab[256];
int crc32_context = 4294967295, g_27, g_64, g_90 = 3, func_2___trans_tmp_4,
main_i, main_j;
int *g_26 = &g_27;
char g_76 = 232;
void crc32_byte(ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118098
Bug ID: 118098
Summary: Missed Optimization of memcpy into Unconditional
Branch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|recent bug with -O2, but|[15 regression] recent bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Reduced but still a bit gross:
```
void fancy_abort(char *, int, const char *) __attribute__((__noreturn__));
unsigned m_num;
struct vl_ptr;
struct va_heap {
typedef vl_ptr default_layout;
};
template
struct
results.20241215.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -O2
-Werror=uninitialized -Werror=aggressive-loop-optimizations
-Werror=sequence-point bug1071.c && ./a.out 1 | grep "g_90 :"
...checksum after hashing g_90 : F239C101
foundBugs $ /home/dcb40b/gcc/results.20241217.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -O2
-Wer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118088
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118073
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118073
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91733c095ee714c0b384153754c6327d5506cd19
commit r15-6313-g91733c095ee714c0b384153754c6327d5506cd19
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118077
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a semi-cleaned up testcase without a special name (_setjmp) being
involved:
```
int f() __attribute__((returns_twice));
struct c1 {
virtual int bb(void) const { return 0; }
bool f1(int a)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Needs -O3 -mcpu=niagara4.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0.0_pre20241215/work/build/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0.0_pre20241215/work/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59900
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59900&action=edit
graphds.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118096
Bug ID: 118096
Summary: [15 regression] Failed bootstrap on sparc (ICE in
expand_insn, at optabs.cc:8269)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118095
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note GCC still has not implemented the referenced paper either. So until it is
implemented, the transformation is not valid as it is transforming something
which is well defined to be something which might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178
--- Comment #22 from Kees Cook ---
On a related note, I need to be able to apply nonstring to arrays of char
arrays. See bug #118095.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118095
Bug ID: 118095
Summary: nonstring attribute cannot be applied to array of char
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59899
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59899&action=edit
Test case preprocessed for riscv64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59898&action=edit
Test case preprocessed for aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
Jonathan Gruber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.gruber.jg at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
Bug ID: 118094
Summary: Missed Optimization of memcpy-Like Loop
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
pinskia did, yeah, but it's already back to it again (we're used to it
happening when people file bugs as we modify/triage while they comment more).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118093
Bug ID: 118093
Summary: std::future::wait_until futex call returns EINVAL for
negative timeout smaller than 1s
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/pip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Gruber ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> The riscv with noap is a target specific issue.
Should I file a new riscv-specific bug for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Gruber ---
(In reply to Jonathan Gruber from comment #5)
> Sorry, was it me who changed the component category, or someone else?
I think someone changed it to middle-end? I was not sure if I did so when I
filed to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
It was just a race with you two both editing the bug. Don't worry about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Sorry, was it me who changed the component category, or someone else?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
Bug ID: 118092
Summary: Missed Optimization of Variadic Functions
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59896
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59896&action=edit
Test case preprocessed for riscv64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59895
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59895&action=edit
Test case preprocessed for aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118092
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59894
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59894&action=edit
Test case preprocessed for x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117990
--- Comment #12 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #11)
> FWIW cam4 is still failing with similar symptoms. So perhaps it is something
> else.
PR 118075 also bisected to this same commit - might be that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117990
--- Comment #11 from Vineet Gupta ---
FWIW cam4 is still failing with similar symptoms. So perhaps it is something
else.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118035
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b273e25e11c842a5729d0e03c85088cf5ba8e06c
commit r15-6311-gb273e25e11c842a5729d0e03c85088cf5ba8e06c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118091
Bug ID: 118091
Summary: Missed Optimization in Creating Medium-Sized Struct
and Passing It as Parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Salvadore ---
I have (finally) started to look into this.
I can reproduce the issue on a FreeBSD 15 machine, but the errors are slightly
different. I have added a -v flag to get more information.
$ ~/GCC/local/usr/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103370
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-17
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090
Bug ID: 118090
Summary: unsignedp argument get_compare_parts is unused by
callers
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improveme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118073
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118080
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
> CLASS and DT were excepted because IMO there is no clear existing definition
how to handle these.
Then there should be a compile-time error ("SORRY").
Fortran (the spec) is quite open in terms of how it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118089
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
> I suspect this is a consequence of moving to an rtl-based prologue.
Or more accurately: epilogue. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118080
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> It is unsurprising that this fails because trans-expr.cc has:
>
> static void
> conv_dummy_value (gfc_se * parmse, gfc_expr * e, gfc_symbol * fsym,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
--- Comment #40 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef458b3fa75537cb2d16f4ce61bc52642ddefd8a
commit r15-6310-gef458b3fa75537cb2d16f4ce61bc52642ddefd8a
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117725
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5)
> even with the changes from comment 3, it still fails with:
>
> In file included from
> ../../../../../src/libsanitizer/interception/interception
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118062
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe1ad3c488693a10fafb39d68c8cabc6e48daa7
commit r15-6309-gcfe1ad3c488693a10fafb39d68c8cabc6e48daa7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118086
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Gruber ---
Created attachment 59892
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59892&action=edit
Minimal test case, medium-sized struct
I also tested this with a medium-sized struct. I have attached the ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118089
Bug ID: 118089
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] arm thumb2 return sequence is
suboptimal, especially at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118088
Bug ID: 118088
Summary: std::priority_queue doesn't maintain invariants after
being moved
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118087
Bug ID: 118087
Summary: std::deque::emplace does not do uses-allocator
construction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118068
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
int is the documented type of the argument (in the manual):
Intel C/C++ Compiler Intrinsic Equivalent
BLENDPS __m128 _mm_blend_ps (__m128 v1, __m128 v2, const int mask);
VBLENDPS __m256 _mm256_blend_ps (__m2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118087
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> We should use something like std::vector::_Temporary_value
See r7-1807-g9958c7eb586f40
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
