[Bug tree-optimization/117646] [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’ with pointer type `max` and comparison to nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug debug/117647] Setting break point changes program output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117647 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Sorry, to be specific: "gdb bug, hence should be reported on their bugzilla at sourceware.org/bugzilla instead".

[Bug debug/117647] Setting break point changes program output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117647 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug testsuite/117494] pr101145inf.c fails on RISC-V without V extension (and maybe other architectures with a CPU lacking vector extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117494 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/117357] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 (unrecognizable insn: UNSPEC_RSQRT) with -mfpmath=387 and __builtin_ia32_rsqrtf()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117357 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #75 from Julian Waters --- Any feedback on the new patch?

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 59617 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59617&action=edit initial partial implementation The attached patch is an initial implementation of f_c_string() up t

[Bug target/117418] ICE: in plus_constant, at explow.cc:102 with -mx32 -maddress-mode=long and __builtin_ia32_encodekey256_u32()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117418 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/117646] [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug tree-optimization/117646] [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’ with pointer type `max` and comparison to nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | Summary|[15 Regression] ICE

[Bug target/117418] ICE: in plus_constant, at explow.cc:102 with -mx32 -maddress-mode=long and __builtin_ia32_encodekey256_u32()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117418 --- Comment #5 from Hu Lin --- Has been backported to gcc12, gcc13 and gcc14.

[Bug tree-optimization/117646] [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/117403] [C++26] Implement P1901R2 Enabling the Use of weak_ptr as Keys in Unordered Associative Containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117403 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/117418] ICE: in plus_constant, at explow.cc:102 with -mx32 -maddress-mode=long and __builtin_ia32_encodekey256_u32()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117418 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Hu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b4bb54e6c45411845ec559c49f594a6239c3969 commit r14-10937-g8b4bb54e6c45411845ec559c49f594a6239c3969 Author: Hu, Lin1 Date: Wed Nov

[Bug target/69374] install.texi is bit-rotten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374 --- Comment #28 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29c4f6637cd604bf993d7309c236ebcdb554a858 commit r15-5373-g29c4f6637cd604bf993d7309c236ebcdb554a858 Author: John David Anglin D

[Bug tree-optimization/117646] New: [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 Bug ID: 117646 Summary: [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’ Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug tree-optimization/117646] [15 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed invalid types for ‘bit_ior_expr’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117646 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The problem is the max(a,b) == 0 match pattern. Let me check what is done for a==0&a==0 for pointers. I can't remember if there is a convert or not.

[Bug target/117599] LoongArch support for BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599 --- Comment #1 from chenglulu --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0) > The ABI needs to be defined: > https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/issues/13. Thank you very much, we're already researching it now.

[Bug bootstrap/26323] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/102296] ELF symbol sizes for variable-length objects are broken (solaris)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102296 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Oh the problem is not DECL_SIZE vs TYPE_SIZE (sorry about that) but rather: sol2.h: size = int_size_in_bytes (TREE_TYPE (DECL)); \ ASM_OUTPUT_SIZE_DIRECTIVE (FILE, NAME, size);

[Bug target/100258] constant store pulled out of the loop causes an extra memory load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100258 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- LLVM does: .LBB0_8: movl$1065353216, (%rsi) movl$1065353216, 12(%rsi) movl$1065353216, 24(%rsi) movl$1065353216, 36(%rsi) addq$4, %rdx add

[Bug target/117616] frv: may need adaptation for C23 varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117616 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/117645] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59616 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59616&action=edit late_combine2 RTL dump

[Bug target/117645] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 Bug ID: 117645 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/116640] Inconsistent compiler rules when using private types as default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116640 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Maiche --- I thought the inconsistency was just tied to whether the default template parameter was a dependent name, but even within cases where a private dependent type is used, there seems to be some inconsistency on

[Bug c++/117450] [DR1753] Allow ~decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117450 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53357] Add -fcheck=bounds for character type-spec in ALLOCATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53357 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug target/117357] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2882 (unrecognizable insn: UNSPEC_RSQRT) with -mfpmath=387 and __builtin_ia32_rsqrtf()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-17 Known to fail|

[Bug testsuite/117494] pr101145inf.c fails on RISC-V without V extension (and maybe other architectures with a CPU lacking vector extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117494 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug testsuite/117644] New: check_vect in tree-vect.h doesn't check RISCV V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117644 Bug ID: 117644 Summary: check_vect in tree-vect.h doesn't check RISCV V Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fail Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/117494] pr101145inf.c fails on RISC-V without V extension (and maybe other architectures with a CPU lacking vector extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117494 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/117494] pr101145inf.c fails on RISC-V without V extension (and maybe other architectures with a CPU lacking vector extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117494 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59614 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59614&action=edit Fix I think This should fix it. signal is the check that is needed here rather than `*-*-linux* *-*-gnu* *-*-u

[Bug target/117477] Register allocator chooses a slot location instead a new callee saved register and not taking inot account pair allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117477 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/117402] [C++26] Implement P2363R5 Extending associative containers with the remaining heterogeneous overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117402 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/103819] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in redirect_callee, at cgraph.c:1389 with __attribute__((flatten)) and -O2 since r11-7940-ge7fd3b783238d034

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 117429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/117429] [15 regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed during IPA pass: inline with -O2 and -fsanitize=bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117429 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/117411] Request for documentation to include exception example

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug modula2/117411] Request for documentation to include exception example

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/117404] [C++23] Implement P2077R3 Heterogeneous erasure overloads for associative containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/117534] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at check_explicit_specialization(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, int, tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.3.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/117534] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at check_explicit_specialization(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, int, tree_node*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117534 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Specialization of template functions is frowned on.

[Bug tree-optimization/117235] [15 Regression] trapping fp statement can be moved across another trapping fp statement since r15-4503-g8d6d6d537fdc75

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117235 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/117642] [12/13/14/15 Regression] __sync_lock_release() on 128bit integer does not behave according to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117642 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|__sync_lock_release() on|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug c++/117535] Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus with recursive lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117535 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug target/79137] Improve powerpc vector permutes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79137 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/117571] [15 Regression] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5714 at -O1 with _BitInt() shift and divide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/117627] [15 Regression] build failure targeting hppa64-linux / hppa64-elf, pa/linux-atomic.c contains invalid C23 (trying typedef bool)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117627 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/117627] [15 Regression] build failure targeting hppa64-linux / hppa64-elf, pa/linux-atomic.c contains invalid C23 (trying typedef bool)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117627 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f50a0794076d6e1d4d1ed693b94d6ee2e4cd849 commit r15-5370-g8f50a0794076d6e1d4d1ed693b94d6ee2e4cd849 Author: John David Anglin D

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitry at andric dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 95445, which changed state. Bug 95445 Summary: diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 What|Remov

[Bug c/95445] diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/95445] diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:701d8e7e60b85809cae348c1e9edb3b0f4924325 commit r15-5369-g701d8e7e60b85809cae348c1e9edb3b0f4924325 Author: Florian Weimer Date: S

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #13 from R. Diez --- > Those two could be combined into one struct so there's only one destructor > registration instead of two. Thanks for your help, but reducing the number of atexit calls doesn't really help me much. As I said

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #1 from kargls at comcast dot net --- Here's a testcase (obviously untested). ! ! { dg-do run } ! program foo use iso_c_binding, only : c_null_char, f_c_string logical, volatile :: asis character(len=6, kind=c_char) s1

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- ld -M or ld --Map=file produces a map file that explains why an object is needed. There is also --cref.

[Bug fortran/117643] New: F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 Bug ID: 117643 Summary: F_C_STRING from F23 is missing Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > The remaining global destructors are: > > src/c++98/ios_base_init.h:12 > src/c++11/compatibility-c++0x.cc:218 > src/c++11/compatibility-c++0x.cc:218 > src/

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- There is a patch under review for GCC 15 which should make the unstable ABI configuration only support SSO string, eventually (the current patch doesn't do it, but I would follow up on it). Building the

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson --- And gcc.dg/torture/pr116915.c which was also added for this BZ invokes UB on int16 targets: pr116915.c: In function 'main': pr116915.c:8:20: warning: iteration 32768 invokes undefined behavior [-Waggre

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The exception types in require a COW string of some kind so that copies are no except. Since we already have one, that's what we use. I'd like to have a more lightweight COW string that is A I compatible

[Bug libstdc++/106852] Implement C++23 P2465R3 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7db55c0ba1baaf0e323ef7f9ef8c9cda077d40e9 commit r15-5366-g7db55c0ba1baaf0e323ef7f9ef8c9cda077d40e9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #8 from R. Diez --- I am not sure yet why generic_category_instance and system_category_instance are not been discarded like they probably should. I haven't found any way to make the linker say why it is pulling certain symbols or o

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, the system_error.cc file uses the other std::string type. It needs to be in a file using the COW string. It could be in its own file, but why doesn't linking with --gc-sections avoid pulling it in?

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug middle-end/117642] New: __sync_lock_release() on 128bit integer does not behave according to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117642 Bug ID: 117642 Summary: __sync_lock_release() on 128bit integer does not behave according to documentation Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywo

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #6 from R. Diez --- I looked further for anything that references *_category* in my firmware, by looking at the linker-generated cross-references table, and I noticed this in file "gcc-14.2.0/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-stdexcept.cc":

[Bug c/117641] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3788) with __sync_fetch_and_add() on _BitInt(128) on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117641 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/114023] complex part%ref of complex named constant array cannot be used in an initialization expression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114023 federico changed: What|Removed |Added CC||federico.perini at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c/117641] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3788) with __sync_fetch_and_add() on _BitInt(128) on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117641 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- sync_resolve_size should have returned -1 due to this: if (size == 16 && fetch && !orig_format && TREE_CODE (type) == BITINT_TYPE && !targetm.scalar_mode_supported_p (TImode)) r

[Bug other/116253] RFE: support for nested diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116253 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Followup patches: * [PATCH 1/2] c++: print z candidate count and number them * https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669035.html * [PATCH 2/2] diagnostics: suppress "note: " prefix in ne

[Bug c/117641] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3788) with __sync_fetch_and_add() on _BitInt(128) on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117641 Bug ID: 117641 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3788) with __sync_fetch_and_add() on _BitInt(128) on i686 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug target/117628] [15 Regression] arm/linux-atomic.c contains invalid C23 (trying to typedef bool)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/117640] [15 Regression] error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers on arm-linux-gnueabi*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117640 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug other/116253] RFE: support for nested diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116253 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 59611 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59611&action=edit Screenshot of textual output with followup patches

[Bug tree-optimization/117638] [14/15 regression] No loop splitting and bounds check not optimized out with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117638 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/116813] std::vector index check not optimized out with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116813 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 --- Comment #10 from Oliver Schönrock --- Sorry, should have made that clear.. yes, appears to be a regression between gcc-10 and gcc-12

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- I suppose the point is that it makes it a regression.

[Bug libstdc++/117276] std::sort(par_unseq ,...) leaks memory when called repeatedly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC 10 is not supported upstream, so we don't care about it anyway.

[Bug target/117640] New: [15 Regression] error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117640 Bug ID: 117640 Summary: [15 Regression] error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/117630] Useless atexit entry for generic_category_instance and system_category_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117630 --- Comment #5 from R. Diez --- I am trying to figure out why generic_category_instance and system_category_instance land in my ELF file even though nobody is apparently using them. Other similar objects, like io_category_instance, do not. So I

[Bug tree-optimization/117638] [14/15 regression] No loop splitting and bounds check not optimized out with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117638 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #0) > I see the following: > * With GCC 13 using -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, we split the loop. > * With GCC 14 and trunk using -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, we can't. > * We don't seem a

[Bug tree-optimization/117639] New: Modified loop-split-1.C doesn't recognise non-escaping std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117639 Bug ID: 117639 Summary: Modified loop-split-1.C doesn't recognise non-escaping std::vector Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/117638] New: [14/15 regression] No loop splitting and bounds check not optimized out with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117638 Bug ID: 117638 Summary: [14/15 regression] No loop splitting and bounds check not optimized out with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/117637] New: g++.dg/tree-ssa/loop-split-1.C has undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117637 Bug ID: 117637 Summary: g++.dg/tree-ssa/loop-split-1.C has undefined behaviour Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- I'm not Jonathan but I don't have a particularly useful guess for when this started. Any chance you'd be willing to bisect it?

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Salvadore --- (In reply to Vedran Miletic from comment #2) > Lorenzo, thanks for packaging new versions so regularly. This issue started > roughly 2-3 versions ago, any ideas why it could be? Thanks for reporting and

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 --- Comment #3 from Vedran Miletic --- FWIW, this issue still exists with: % g++15 --version g++15 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 15.0.0 20241110 (experimental)