https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117370
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1bbad07c8686c858ea58ffdb9db8f964bf485c6
commit r15-4953-gc1bbad07c8686c858ea58ffdb9db8f964bf485c6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59539
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59539&action=edit
Patch which I am testing which removes the comparison support for `?:`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117416
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea46a216d48597b220ae69e79f6513c763f953be
commit r15-4952-gea46a216d48597b220ae69e79f6513c763f953be
Author: Hu, Lin1
Date: Mon Nov 4 14:52:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #2 from Sam Jame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117445
Bug ID: 117445
Summary: ICE: in gimple_build_assign_1, at gimple.cc:480
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117433
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fc25a21820001c67258d30f0960ac9cd0f268cf
commit r15-4951-g2fc25a21820001c67258d30f0960ac9cd0f268cf
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[14/15 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117438
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Mayshao-oc from comment #0)
> Created attachment 59530 [details]
> gcc -O1 loop.c
>
> Pass_align_tight_loops align the inner loop aggressively, this may cause
> significant performance regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56513
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56513
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.4.1, 13.3.1, 14.2.1, |12.2.0, 12.4.0, 13.3.0
|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117443
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
It looks like pa_legitimate_address_p should accept any reloading pseudo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113243
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
Thanks for your report.
For R2, this problem has been fixed by
commit e3e5fd0c24c9b82d824da27bf8455bb3654e8eff
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Sat Jun 8 11:31:19 2024 +0800
MIPS: Use signaling fcmp instruc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117304
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
$: grep AVX512F i386-builtin.def | grep -v EVEX512 | grep -e V8DI -e V8DF -e
V16SI -e V16SF -e V32HI -e V32HF -e V32BF -e V64QI
BDESC (OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F, 0,
CODE_FOR_unspec_fix_truncv8dfv8si2_mask_roun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110281
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59538
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59538&action=edit
pr110281-attempted-reduction.c
Here's an attempted reduction. It needs to be checked for aliasing violations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117304
--- Comment #3 from Hu Lin ---
Confirmed, thanks.
We should disallow the use of the avx512f builtin without evex512, throwing an
error instead of ICE. After testing, the fixed patch will be merged and
backported to GCC-14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117438
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103701, which changed state.
Bug 103701 Summary: C++20 modules create internal compiler error at
import_export_decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103701
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103701
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #73 from Julian Waters ---
Thanks for the reminder, I did choose to leave that out since I was under the
impression that regenerating configure should be done in a separate commit. I
chose a different approach for the configure check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117300
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99274, which changed state.
Bug 99274 Summary: [modules] Error compiling some system headers: "wrong number
of template arguments (1, should be 2)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99274, which changed state.
Bug 99274 Summary: [modules] Error compiling some system headers: "wrong number
of template arguments (1, should be 2)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99274
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a96c774f7bb99729ab9e7e2a57cd970469ccbc08
commit r15-4944-ga96c774f7bb99729ab9e7e2a57cd970469ccbc08
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 105443, which changed state.
Bug 105443 Summary: [modules] Internal compiler error in write_location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105443
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105443
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105443
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48ef485eabc8fd3e16d184860ce693816f3919eb
commit r15-4943-g48ef485eabc8fd3e16d184860ce693816f3919eb
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84b713589646c63b38ec55352fb87c1e80b69b66
commit r13-9169-g84b713589646c63b38ec55352fb87c1e80b69b66
Author: Andrew MacLeod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78d3156d53567cb2794c3df21dc0d914abe43543
commit r12-10802-g78d3156d53567cb2794c3df21dc0d914abe43543
Author: Andrew MacLeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1154e294b3d8f7267612afb2113b2572cb39e33
commit r14-10884-ge1154e294b3d8f7267612afb2113b2572cb39e33
Author: Andrew MacLeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113814
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35425d025b46a384fa89c4d06bd7c128d09e3009
commit r15-4940-g35425d025b46a384fa89c4d06bd7c128d09e3009
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117300
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ae4a838bc0f5796369d982330acacf7a8fa7eab
commit r15-4941-g8ae4a838bc0f5796369d982330acacf7a8fa7eab
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Nov 5 06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
Well that patch disables jump tables for -O0 and the test case assumes they'll
be generated. The test case is not compiled with any optimization levels, so
we could either explicitly add -O1 or -fjump-table
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 113814, which changed state.
Bug 113814 Summary: [modules] canonical types ICE with imported partial
specialization matching existing template-id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113814
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113814
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113710
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35425d025b46a384fa89c4d06bd7c128d09e3009
commit r15-4940-g35425d025b46a384fa89c4d06bd7c128d09e3009
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117444
Bug ID: 117444
Summary: [15 regression] Assembler output changes after
r15-4756-g06bc3a734e8890
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117300
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1d91adb572ca0c5f5e788b070e97c4fe744505a
commit r15-4939-gc1d91adb572ca0c5f5e788b070e97c4fe744505a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Oct 27 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117443
Bug ID: 117443
Summary: lo.c:1462:1: ICE: in change_address_1, at
emit-rtl.cc:2299
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Cannot build libgfortran|[15 Regression] Cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117442
Bug ID: 117442
Summary: Cannot build libgfortran with
enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats after
r15-4760-g0b73e9382ab51c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117438
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/651699.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117438
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>this may cause significant performance regression of some nested loops.
I suspect it depends on the micro-arch for the x86 target.
What are you running the test on?
.p2align 6
.L3:
I notice GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117437
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the lambda is required for the value-expr. Though maybe you can get a
similar thing with nested functions but I have not tried.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||c++-lambda
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117065
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-04
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117065
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
0x35b9ae9 internal_error(char const*, ...)
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc-match/gcc/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:518
0x1b966b9 tree_class_check_failed(tree_node const*, tree_code_class, char
cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the last issue is that we don't optimize the dynamic initialization to
static initialization, details in PR102876.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think Richi didn't like it much, but my memory is fuzzy on it.
The latest version of the patch was
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588539.html
I'll need to look at IRC logs if somet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There are multiple issues.
One is that we uselessly use the sub_byte_op_p case for empty_ctor_p even if it
starts and ends on byte boundary. The need for int_mode_for_size (bitlen, 0)
check is native_encod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117289
--- Comment #4 from Indu Bhagat ---
On the BTF side, we will see an additional BTF type too with -std=gnu23 (as
expected because BTF generation is based off CTF internally in GCC):
$ bpftool btf dump file ctf-function-pointers-2.o
[1] STRUCT 'c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117289
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers ---
If deduplication is mainly meant to happen at link time, should we then add
-std=gnu17 to this test and leave this issue for a potential future
optimization of the CTF output in a single object in -std=gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
--- snip ---
>
> so you can instead do
>
> gfc_symbol_buffer the_buf;
>
> and have it behave like a char the_buf[GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN] declaration.
>
> The au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/667365.html
>
> @Simon .. if it's a show-stoppe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in merge, at |ICE: in merge, at
|ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb929c391fe1e6c2e343abbf9464210554da415b
commit r14-10879-geb929c391fe1e6c2e343abbf9464210554da415b
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-apple-darwin23
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117441
Bug ID: 117441
Summary: ICE in RTL pass
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117051
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59535
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59535&action=edit
Slightly more reduced
Remove templates.
Note There is a missed loop to memset optimization too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105443
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bcfdac0ef763587efd014310b779e192b143c62
commit r15-4918-g7bcfdac0ef763587efd014310b779e192b143c62
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117051
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6afd361c53c319f5151ddd6c0700eea8b0125c9
commit r15-4900-gf6afd361c53c319f5151ddd6c0700eea8b0125c9
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Which commit did you hit this with?
I only know sometime before 20220515. Someone with more
git knowledge than me might be able to make progress in
bisection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117048
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c46a541c6957e8b0eee339d4cff46e951a5ad4e
commit r15-4889-g1c46a541c6957e8b0eee339d4cff46e951a5ad4e
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117276
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Schönrock ---
Realised the link to my repo with demo code was incorrect. Here is the correct
one:
https://github.com/oschonrock/tbbleak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117440
Bug ID: 117440
Summary: ICE: in merge, at ipa-modref.cc:2138 at -Os with
"-fno-tree-pta"
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107294
--- Comment #7 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk ---
I was sufficiently confused having read the Standard to persuade Dr John Reid
to submit a request for clarification to J3, the Fortran Standards Committee.
The request is at https://j3-fortran.org/d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116725
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116725
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9141bfdd483e2838f5dce767f1c1657710ef2daf
commit r15-4888-g9141bfdd483e2838f5dce767f1c1657710ef2daf
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:766075c47db5cc9d04463bfb2219b593bb4263ee
commit r15-4887-g766075c47db5cc9d04463bfb2219b593bb4263ee
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14/15] ICE in |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117287
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:393ee6b64579ea5ae5ae88079d271d3a237c7d9f
commit r14-10876-g393ee6b64579ea5ae5ae88079d271d3a237c7d9f
Author: Andrew MacLeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117439
Bug ID: 117439
Summary: [11/12/13/14/15] ICE in encode_tree_to_bitpos
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102296
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Please Cc me on Solaris bugs from the beginning, otherwise I'm almost
guaranteed to miss them.
That said, where do you see this? (The PR refers to GCC 12.0). As far
as I could find, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801
--- Comment #39 from Christophe Lyon ---
A bit more context:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101028/0012/14--M-profile-Vector-Extension--MVE--intrinsics
The section about predicates uses the word 'lanes' and says 'When calling a
predica
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72b7bbf9d4482fac6bac81508833e407201e0733
commit r14-10874-g72b7bbf9d4482fac6bac81508833e407201e0733
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117296
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82285392ab5cd1d83b8f4a92f521d3323c5996e7
commit r14-10871-g82285392ab5cd1d83b8f4a92f521d3323c5996e7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:377f81a60ba78dde6c59bc40af46ef8ad3569693
commit r14-10873-g377f81a60ba78dde6c59bc40af46ef8ad3569693
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117321
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec43369c7e2c4b930a501252fa048df51c141970
commit r14-10870-gec43369c7e2c4b930a501252fa048df51c141970
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117354
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1553e4094207cfe87e98980752a88a49e1b6626d
commit r14-10872-g1553e4094207cfe87e98980752a88a49e1b6626d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afcbf4dd27c147eb7d8f84e1a41c021eddec777e
commit r15-4883-gafcbf4dd27c147eb7d8f84e1a41c021eddec777e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117419
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
enum size is ABI (affects data layout). So you can't use -f[no-]short-enums
for executable tests. The best way to deal with this is to ensure that the
size of the enum defaults to int (eg by adding a du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56513
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
For something this old, we should probably just close it as fixed as of Richi's
patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94404
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #420 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 59532
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59532&action=edit
Preprocessed source from from comment #419
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117433
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I suspect a plain SSA assignment would also ICE this way. Testing a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #419 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
In the meantime, I found another regression when building ffmpeg:
gcc -I. -Isrc/ -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64
-Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> The executable stack thing happens when a trampoline is required to handle
> the nested function. Optimization will sometimes elide the nested function
> call vi
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo