[Bug target/117253] [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 13.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117253 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- For the singlebuff.c benchmark, the numbers are: Trunk (sources checked out October 5th):5.40 seconds GCC 14 (sources checked out October 21st): 5.40 seconds GCC 13 (sources checked out October 21

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Note, in the first comment, I mis-read the instruction, and the instruction being used is vector unsigned long long rotate left, and not vector unsigned long long shift left. I.e.:

[Bug c/117254] New: ICE: have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:6512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117254 Bug ID: 117254 Summary: ICE: have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:6512 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/117253] [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 13.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117253 Davide Italiano changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/117253] [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 13.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/117253] New: [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 13.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117253 Bug ID: 117253 Summary: [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 13.3 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug tree-optimization/117252] New: SLSR does not always handle mem_refs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117252 Bug ID: 117252 Summary: SLSR does not always handle mem_refs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- I tracked down the commit that first made the slowdown visible: commit 3a61ca1b9256535e1bfb19b2d46cde21f3908a5d (HEAD) Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Thu Jul 6 18:56:22 2023 +0200 Improve profile upda

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 59406 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59406&action=edit Singlebuff.c test The singlebuff.c is a simpler test case than multibuff.c. However, the numbers quoted an

[Bug target/117251] SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|15.0

[Bug target/117251] New: SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251 Bug ID: 117251 Summary: SHA3 code for PowerPC has a major slow down Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug target/117238] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92618.c -O1 (internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117238 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- This is caused by infinite loop in LRA. We have a problem handling OImode: (insn 385 384 386 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg/v:OI 132 [ e ]) 20) (subreg:SI (reg/v:OI 452 [orig:132 e ] [132]) 20)) "/home

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #14) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > > But this testcase is in gcc.target/ anyway, right? > That's just a copy of gcc.dg/torture/pr6408

[Bug target/116953] [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/117226] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-tree-forwprop" on x86_64-linux-gnu with ext-dce since r15-1901-g98914f9eba5f19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117226 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b commit r15-4532-g36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b Author: Jeff Law Date: Mon Oct 21

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b commit r15-4532-g36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b Author: Jeff Law Date: Mon Oct 21

[Bug rtl-optimization/116915] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116915 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b commit r15-4532-g36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b Author: Jeff Law Date: Mon Oct 21

[Bug tree-optimization/116579] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{2, 3} with "-fno-thread-jumps" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1901 (ext-dce)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116579 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b commit r15-4532-g36e91df7716d34aa5694533837551593ec28f22b Author: Jeff Law Date: Mon Oct 21

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > I think the right fix is to add a put_noreplace method that asserts > internally and transform incorrect gcc_assert (!...->put(...)) instances to > that. Th

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/116959] [15 regression] RISC-V: more ICEs in compute_nregs_for_mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116959 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/116822] [15 regression] RISC-V: ICE in compute_nregs_for_mode, at config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/117250] [15] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/unsigned_38.f90 Error: Operand of unary numeric operator '-' at (1) is UNSIGNED(4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117250 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/117250] New: [15] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/unsigned_38.f90 Error: Operand of unary numeric operator '-' at (1) is UNSIGNED(4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117250 Bug ID: 117250 Summary: [15] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/unsigned_38.f90 Error: Operand of unary numeric operator '-' at (1) is UNSIGNED(4) Product: gcc Version: 15.0

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2014-August/394801.html

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note assert checking has been enabled for release checking so this is why it was not noticed until now. I only noticed because I was working on SLSR and noticed the bad gcc_assert and was going to submit a p

[Bug middle-end/117249] [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5

[Bug middle-end/117249] New: [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117249 Bug ID: 117249 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] --disable-checking is broken since r5-2450 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug target/116425] RISC-V missed optimization: vector lowering along lmul boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116425 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The vector loads you're referring to always load a full vector register and do not need a configuration to be set by vsetvl. There's also move instructions that copy from one vector register to another with

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions since r13-6128-g4782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 --- Comment #7 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 59404 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59404&action=edit patch Candidate patch for PR117145 and PR11745

[Bug libstdc++/115285] [12/13/14/15 Regression] std::unordered_set can have duplicate value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug tree-optimization/117235] [15 Regression] trapping fp statement can be moved across another trapping fp statement since r15-4503-g8d6d6d537fdc75

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117235 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers --- I agree that we should consider -ftrapping-math to be misnamed and to be about exception flags, not anything that would involve preserving the order in which exceptions are raised (between function calls o

[Bug target/117240] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.cc:657 with __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v32qi() or __builtin_ia32_vaesenc_v64qi()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117240 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 59403 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59403&action=edit testcase failing with -mevex512 -mvaes $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -mevex512 -mvaes testcase.c -Wno-psabi during

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > But this testcase is in gcc.target/ anyway, right? That's just a copy of gcc.dg/torture/pr64088.c : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/t

[Bug tree-optimization/117176] [15 regression] ICE when building netpbm-11.8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/116425] RISC-V missed optimization: vector lowering along lmul boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116425 Dusan Stojkovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dusan.stojko...@rt-rk.com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/116915] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116915 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 116915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/116915] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116915 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/116488] [15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-forward-propagate" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 117226 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/117226] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-tree-forwprop" on x86_64-linux-gnu with ext-dce since r15-1901-g98914f9eba5f19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117226 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/117224] warning states "this" is explicit by-copy capture but it's an explicit by-reference capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117224 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/117248] New: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 Bug ID: 117248 Summary: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #7 from Frank Scheiner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Another option would be to revert r15-4402 and r15-4377 and reapply once > this fix is tested and approved. Reverting both commits results in a working compile

[Bug rtl-optimization/116783] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 with late pair fusion pass (wrong alias analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression] Wrong|[14 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug c++/117231] [15 regression] Incorrect code generation for std::generator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116783] [14/15 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 with late pair fusion pass (wrong alias analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0e54ce1999ccf2241f74c5188b11b92e5aedc1f commit r15-4518-gc0e54ce1999ccf2241f74c5188b11b92e5aedc1f Author: Alex Coplan Date: Fri S

[Bug libstdc++/117220] [15 regression] is broken with Clang (stl_iterator.h:1080:42: error: an attribute list cannot appear here)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/117220] [15 regression] is broken with Clang (stl_iterator.h:1080:42: error: an attribute list cannot appear here)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cba80691251efccf44ab9aecb26558319605c9ea commit r15-4515-gcba80691251efccf44ab9aecb26558319605c9ea Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 --- Comment #6 from Frank Scheiner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 59372 [details] > gcc15-pr117190.patch > > Untested fix. Unfortunately applying the patch onto gcc-15-20241020 (01f50ebfd97a7bd17a4cc94c403a

[Bug c/117190] [15 Regression] ICE on linux-6.11.3: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.cc:2085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190 Frank Scheiner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frank.scheiner at web dot de --- Comme

[Bug target/117247] [OpenMP][nvptx] cuCtxSynchronize with 'omp target loop' + PRIVATE clause and -O1 (OpenMP_VV's teams_loop/test_target_teams_loop_private.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117247 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Follow up note: the following all fails (on nvptx with -Og, -Os, -O1 or higher); the first two are nearly identical on dump level: - omp loop - omp simd - omp for simd while the following works: - o

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions since r13-6128-g4782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE: |[13/14/15 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/117247] New: [OpenMP][nvptx] cuCtxSynchronize with 'omp target loop' + PRIVATE clause and -O1 (OpenMP_VV's teams_loop/test_target_teams_loop_private.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117247 Bug ID: 117247 Summary: [OpenMP][nvptx] cuCtxSynchronize with 'omp target loop' + PRIVATE clause and -O1 (OpenMP_VV's teams_loop/test_target_teams_loop_private.c) Product:

[Bug middle-end/117123] [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 14.4 since r14-6536-gcd794c39610177 (sccopy)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |15.0 Assignee|pheeck at gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/117211] [15 regression] Building gcc configured with --enable-coverage=opt fails with a link error after r15-4286-gc397a8c12296b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117211 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug c++/117246] g++ O1 finline bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117246 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The 'delete test' is undefined behaviour as well. You should enable warnings when compiling: -Wall

[Bug c++/117246] g++ O1 finline bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117246 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index- > flifetime-dse > > `To preserve stores before the constructor starts (e.g. because

[Bug tree-optimization/107467] [12/13 Regression] Miscompilation involving -Os, flto, and -fno-strict-aliasing since r12-656-ga564da506f52be66

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467 --- Comment #16 from Sam James --- We should add the testcase as well (I can do it).

[Bug tree-optimization/107467] [12/13 Regression] Miscompilation involving -Os, flto, and -fno-strict-aliasing since r12-656-ga564da506f52be66

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||14.2.0 Summary|[12/13/14 Re

[Bug tree-optimization/116982] [14 Regregression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-code-hoisting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/116907] [14 regression] ICE when building kakoune-2024.05.18 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117104] [12/13/14 regression] ICE when building python-3.12.7 (prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.cc:4622) with -O2 -march=x86-64-v4 -fno-vect-cost-model -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117104 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44c3eba2dfa71cb7cd9f8c3e7f33ef2b08132a51 commit r14-10814-g44c3eba2dfa71cb7cd9f8c3e7f33ef2b08132a51 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/116982] [14 Regregression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-code-hoisting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d11536881e60f36a2b8ad9919169ac7a8bc0e3e commit r14-10813-g1d11536881e60f36a2b8ad9919169ac7a8bc0e3e Author: Richard Biene

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13 Regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||14.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug lto/116907] [14 regression] ICE when building kakoune-2024.05.18 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116907 --- Comment #35 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4744558b6a1d0a1c203acc827b6ad0cfe039212 commit r14-10812-ga4744558b6a1d0a1c203acc827b6ad0cfe039212 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/116481] [12/13/14 Regression] `arrays of functions are not meaningful` error message happens with -W -Wall -O2 even though there are no arrays of function types used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116481 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d8b8ed7835a1a03932a8c90c7c725f9903450d5 commit r14-10811-g8d8b8ed7835a1a03932a8c90c7c725f9903450d5 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69934cb171fdd9d58dd64bb1811afaf43f6f7e44 commit r14-10810-g69934cb171fdd9d58dd64bb1811afaf43f6f7e44 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug middle-end/115110] [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ac6159f8b5119e75a19f70f3c4578895f59cb53 commit r14-10809-g2ac6159f8b5119e75a19f70f3c4578895f59cb53 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug middle-end/117123] [14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on trunk is larger than GCC 14.4 since r14-6536-gcd794c39610177 (sccopy)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117123 --- Comment #10 from Filip Kastl --- I've looked at the pre-details dumps for runs with and without sccopy1 (I'm compiling the reduced testcase with -Os). Even when I adjust for different SSA name versions, there are many differences in the dum

[Bug middle-end/117243] [14/15 regression] program crash under -O3 optimization or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117243 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-21 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/117239] [12/13/14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s, 2} with "-fno-inline -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-7472-g609e8c492d62d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug libgcc/115242] libgcc unwinder does not handle vector registers, even if the target machine supports them.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115242 --- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Alisa Sireneva from comment #4) > I think this is a wider issue. The root of the problem is that > __builtin_unwind_init() affects what it _thinks_ are _callee-saved_ > registers. I think this

[Bug c++/117246] g++ O1 finline bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117246 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 --- Comment #6 from Martin Uecker --- The commit causing this was like this where the middle end code was removed, which then exposed the cases where the FE did not emit DECL_EXPR correctly. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=42d16

[Bug c++/117246] g++ O1 finline bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117246 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/117246] New: g++ O1 finline bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117246 Bug ID: 117246 Summary: g++ O1 finline bug Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: una

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks to be some missing DECL_EXPR which was there for GCC 12 but gone for GCC 13.

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- There most likely should be a C front-end specific version of reconstruct_complex_type which does the copy of C_TYPE_VARIABLY_MODIFIED too. Which means this originally was caused by r13-6128.

[Bug c/117145] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:355 at -O1 and above with vector_size and VLA in struct argument since r14-1143-g42d1612eb5c3b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I suspect PR 117245 and this one has the same underlying issue where C_TYPE_VARIABLY_MODIFIED gets lost after the vector_size recreates the types. That is using a typedef for the vector type fixes the

[no subject]

🙏ขออนุญาตแนะนำสำหรับเจ้าของธุรกิจ ที่จดทะเบียนการค้า/พาณิชย์/ หจก. อุตสาหกรรมทั่วไป ทุนหมุนเวียนระยะสั้น อนุมัติง่าย ☑️เริ่มต้น 1.5% - 0.5% ☑️อนุมัติสูงสุด 3,000,000 บาท ☑️ทราบผล ภายใน 30 นาที (หลังส่งเอกสารครบถ้วน) ☑️พร้อมลงพื้นที่ประเมินหน้างานและทำสัญญา ❌ไม่มีนโยบายเรียกชำระก่อนทำสัญญาทุกกรณี❌ ✔

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I am suspecting r13-6128 where C_TYPE_VARIABLY_MODIFIED is getting lost after applying the vector_size attribute ...

[Bug c/117245] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Keywords|

[Bug c/117245] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/117245] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Bug ID: 117245 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107467] [12/13/14 Regression] Miscompilation involving -Os, flto, and -fno-strict-aliasing since r12-656-ga564da506f52be66

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107467 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/117244] [14/15 Regression] missed vectorization of (-(unsigned int)(bool_var))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117244 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug ada/116438] GNAT should print backtraces on ICEs with bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116438 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/116438] GNAT should print backtraces on ICEs with bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116438 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 59401 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59401&action=edit WIP patch This adds support for libbacktrace with the big limitations I mentioned.

[Bug rtl-optimization/117239] [12/13/14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-inline -fschedule-insns" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/117235] [15 Regression] trapping fp statement can be moved across another trapping fp statement since r15-4503-g8d6d6d537fdc75

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117235 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, but re-ordering should be OK as long as no intermediate FP state is examined (which of course we do not track via dependences in the IL). I think we have many more passes where such re-ordering can ha

[Bug c/117230] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in sizeof_pointer_memaccess_warning, at c-family/c-warn.cc:987 with -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117230 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/117226] [15 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-tree-forwprop" on x86_64-linux-gnu with ext-dce since r15-1901-g98914f9eba5f19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/117217] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in sra when copying struct with a union of structs with bool bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

  1   2   >