https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116132
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89749
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113744
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116169
Bug ID: 116169
Summary: [DR882] `int main() = delete` is incorrect accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98254
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> V
> qux (short *b)
> {
> W a = *(W *)b;
> return __builtin_convertvector (a, V);
> }
This was fixed on the trunk with r15-1677-gc320a7efcd35ba (and maybe som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pinskia at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113744
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kong Lingling :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25dba615e3c191f0a7264538b6d260e91ca2624a
commit r15-2471-g25dba615e3c191f0a7264538b6d260e91ca2624a
Author: Lingling Kong
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65115
John Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john.carter at taitradio dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-01
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116168
Bug ID: 116168
Summary: Segmentation fault when compiling user-defined
partial_ordering
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
--- Comment #4 from Jason Liam ---
Yes, this is well-formed because the move ctor here is deleted as per 2.6 as
explained in this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/a/78817438/12002570
In C++26, constructors have types through CWG2479 which is D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 58786 [details]
> gcc15-pr115981.patch
>
> Untested fix. As since that commit it checks swap_commutative_operands_p:
> 1) CONST_VECTOR I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116167
Bug ID: 116167
Summary: "static_cast" of member function pointer
(non-noexcept) to noexcept erroneously succeeds if not
overloaded
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Although maybe I've disabled it, because at least two of those checks are no
longer relevant, and should have been preventing me from committing things if
the hook was still using that awk script. It might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have this awk script as a git pre-commit hook:
#!/usr/bin/awk -f
# Usage: badtests.awk [-v std_mode=NN] FILE...
# Check each FILE for logic errors in dejagnu directives.
# This is intended for the libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh yes GCC does not currently implement P1787R6 (PR 98939) . This explains most
of this really.
P1787R6 has huge implications across the compiler which is one of the reasons
why it has not be done yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
* Missing braces (e.g. 'dg-do run }' or 'dg-do run')
Problem: Checking for that is noisy because some people have been good and
explained workarounds but then they mention 'dg-...' in a comment and it might
loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116058
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> Yes I have not submitted this yet because I have been busy with some other
> patches. But I should have some time on Friday to work on getting this patch
> tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
Bug ID: 116166
Summary: risc-v (last) insn-emit-nn.c build takes hours
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99082
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
_8 = (unsigned int) _7;
_9 = _8 << 16;
_10 = _6 | _9;
r8_20 = (const uint8_t) _10;
```
Obviously r8_20 should be assigned from (const uint8_t)_6 since _9's lower
values are 0.
Having a simple pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #46 from Bill Wendling ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #45)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #42)
> >
> > But for the kernel you'll need to have fallback code which will set the
> > actual counter manually for compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #45 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #42)
>
> But for the kernel you'll need to have fallback code which will set the
> actual counter manually for compilers without support for counted_by
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #44 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #41)
> I also do not yet understand why this feature is needed. The count should be
> set anyway.
Yes. But setting the count in _every_ place where a structure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #43 from Bill Wendling ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #40)
> Note, our original purpose of adding this new builtin is explicitly
> described in description section as:
>
> with the new builtin, "structs can gain the counted_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> vect_create_addr_base_for_vector_ref(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment
> #3)
> > Seems the mismatches are in some var names, like
> Which I think comes from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #40)
> Note, our original purpose of adding this new builtin is explicitly
> described in description section as:
>
> with the new builtin, "structs can gain the counted_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116165
Bug ID: 116165
Summary: thin archive support in gcc/Makefile.in uses T rather
than --thin
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-imp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #40 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Wendling from comment #39)
>
> But this all relies upon the 'counted_by' attribute existing. For this
> example:
>
> typeof(*__builtin_get_counted_by(P->FAM)) idx;
>
> f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116164
Bug ID: 116164
Summary: SARIF output doesn't yet capture fix-it hints on notes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-31
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So current things that are known to be used a lot (wrongly):
* `dg-run` should be replaced with `dg-do run` (this has showed up more than
you think and even in new code; I just happened to have this typo to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
--- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #21)
>
> (...) and should be able to submit the first
> series (inline minloc without dim argument) this week.
>
I missed the "this week" mark (again), but I've finall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6886f1c164af9381b4dd6c4d5202a3bbca225168
commit r15-2459-g6886f1c164af9381b4dd6c4d5202a3bbca225168
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88935
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Bug ID: 116163
Summary: RFE: add a linting tool for DegaGnu tests
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116134
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c65653f5685a106661596a413744953ea9cdbc60
commit r15-2458-gc65653f5685a106661596a413744953ea9cdbc60
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #39 from Bill Wendling ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #38)
> (In reply to Bill Wendling from comment #37)
> > That does make me wonder at the usefulness of this feature. The user will
> > need to set the count whether or not t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-31
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
> I am not sure this [the first case] is valid code though.
The Standard contains an example of exactly this situation:
https://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#example-8
using A::x; // OK, hides struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110339
Bug 110339 depends on bug 110356, which changed state.
Bug 110356 Summary: [C++26] P2637R3 Member visit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110356
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110356
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110339
Bug 110339 depends on bug 115776, which changed state.
Bug 115776 Summary: [C++26] Implement P2757R3 Type checking format args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115776
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115776
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105595
--- Comment #4 from Arsen Arsenović ---
hm, actually, is this valid code?
in https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15 the standard says:
For any definable item D with definitions in multiple translation units,
- (15.1) if D is a non-inline non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or do you mean instead of error it should be just defined as deleted perhaps
with
warning per
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct.def#default-2.6
? In that case, I think clang implements it correctly and while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69a9ee05c68bd1fe7f5b3be86baacc8f0a599915
commit r15-2456-g69a9ee05c68bd1fe7f5b3be86baacc8f0a599915
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed Jul 31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116147
--- Comment #14 from David Dudley ---
OK, have the problems with the native compiler worked out. Configuration
problem on the host computer.
Now, it's building the native compiler using the new compiler with no problem.
This is planned to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115881
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm the change fixed linux-6.10 build for me. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116162
Bug ID: 116162
Summary: GCC rejects explicitly default move ctor with const
X&& parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2fac502097f75e4a098a3321f216523b59030be
commit r15-2454-gf2fac502097f75e4a098a3321f216523b59030be
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #38 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Wendling from comment #37)
> I realized my error after sending this. So yeah it's not going to work. I'm
> okay with what's being discussed. I just want to make it clear to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
It's so slow to compile that I don't know if I can reduce this. I might just
look for other testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116136
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116136
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89ed5ab210b5e30c325b92e9e40c50e337be1b44
commit r15-2452-g89ed5ab210b5e30c325b92e9e40c50e337be1b44
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed Jul 31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.8.0 |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 58788
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58788&action=edit
Simplified testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110356
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08782a5d92bacc3af947caf79d19bf25eae02e7b
commit r15-2448-g08782a5d92bacc3af947caf79d19bf25eae02e7b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110356
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6f2c78d9db37228baa9d1f9926b0c120e24016f
commit r15-2447-gf6f2c78d9db37228baa9d1f9926b0c120e24016f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115776
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3836df7e895beda1f159620bfd20024136fda9f0
commit r15-2446-g3836df7e895beda1f159620bfd20024136fda9f0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fcompare-debug |-fcompare-debug
|-gno-sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74b5101cc9e297f7c530642553e3498d4d705cf4
commit r15-2444-g74b5101cc9e297f7c530642553e3498d4d705cf4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Bug ID: 116161
Summary: -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers failure with
-O3 -march=native -fno-vect-cost-model when building
rapidfuzz
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116160
Bug ID: 116160
Summary: Rejects repeated using-declaration `using A::x;`
[namespace.udecl]
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83294
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107757
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116143
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
[...snip...]
> My guess is that nothing is using class simple_diagnostic_path in cc1, and
> thus the code for simple_diagnostic_path is being dropped by the linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116142
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Can you check if the following makes things work for you?
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> index 67f6e5df255..7496e31164c 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
>From what I can tell, in Microsoft's implementation the JSON-RPC messages are
being "packaged" or "framed" via LSP's base protocol, as per:
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specificatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
commit r15-2440-g21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
Author: Sam James
Date: Tue Jul 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92024
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
commit r15-2440-g21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
Author: Sam James
Date: Tue Jul 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110057
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
commit r15-2440-g21fc6d35f27cdf4c56e9f093894f6728c55ecb0e
Author: Sam James
Date: Tue Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106828
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d398581485b4141b43b11f27c8eb359a99fe4ca9
commit r15-2441-gd398581485b4141b43b11f27c8eb359a99fe4ca9
Author: Sam James
Date: Tue Jul 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116149
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
It looks like the problem is a wrong mode_idx attribute for the wx variants of
the adds. The widening adds's mode is the one of the non-widened input operand
but for the wx/scalar variants this is a scalar mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58786
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58786&action=edit
gcc15-pr115981.patch
Untested fix. As since that commit it checks swap_commutative_operands_p:
1) CONST_VECTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
--- Comment #2 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
I am away on business right now and cannot deal with this. The plan is to
revert the backport. Please feel free to do this because I am likely to be
seriously jet lagged over the weeke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116058
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I've done light testing. Essentially it gets us past the ICE. I'm still
seeing a comparison failure, but that will be a distinct BZ once I get get my
brain around what's going wrong.
So ideally Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
