https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 87448, which changed state.
Bug 87448 Summary: ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type
signature using an associated variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 59104, which changed state.
Bug 59104 Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
> (cherry picked from commit ccaa39a268bef2a1d8880022696ff2dcaa6af941)
Backporting to 13-branch fails:
[pault@pc30 gcc-13]$ git gcc-backport
r15-1468-gccaa39a268bef2a1d8880022696ff2dcaa6af941
Auto-mergin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7db47f7b915c5f5d645fa536547e26b92290afe3
commit r15-2170-g7db47f7b915c5f5d645fa536547e26b92290afe3
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56f824cc206ff00d466aaeb11211d8005c4668bc
commit r15-2172-g56f824cc206ff00d466aaeb11211d8005c4668bc
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59dd1d7ab21ad9a7ebf641ec9aeea609c003ad2f
commit r15-2169-g59dd1d7ab21ad9a7ebf641ec9aeea609c003ad2f
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c4c1fe6df0f752764cdfd7404a60bfd2b4f5057
commit r15-2168-g5c4c1fe6df0f752764cdfd7404a60bfd2b4f5057
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 113363, which changed state.
Bug 113363 Summary: ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c81ff02a943cda82cc1a82b36ae8ab14470b00a
commit r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cda82cc1a82b36ae8ab14470b00a
Author: Paul Thomas
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116011
--- Comment #4 from Hubert Tong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The reality of the issue comes down to accepting this:
> ```
> struct foo { int val; };
>
> int main() { decltype(&(foo::val)) ptr; }
> ```
Yes, which was added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116011
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reality of the issue comes down to accepting this:
```
struct foo { int val; };
int main() { decltype(&(foo::val)) ptr; }
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116011
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong ---
The fix for Clang is in the works:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713#issuecomment-2240767267
An issue has been filed against the Itanium ABI:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #28 from Sam James ---
Many thanks both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116011
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Clang also rejects this:
```
:13:55: error: no matching function for call to 'f'
13 | constexpr int g(char (*p)[sizeof(char)] = 0) { return f(p); }
|
anguages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --without-ppl --without-cloog-ppl
--enable-checking=release --disable-nls --enable-lto
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib64,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib32
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240719 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96846
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
If I change the definition of B to:
template
using B = A;
Then it works in GCC and MSVC but still fails on clang (but that might be a
clang issue).
Note EDG also rejects it.
```
"", line 20: error: no in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I tested the trunk of clang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
--- Comment #2 from Julien Bernard ---
Which version of clang did you use ?
cppreference.com indicate that "class template argument deduction for alias
templates" support started with clang 19 which seems to be not released yet.
gcc introducte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
While we wait for Honza, Ignacy, if you could try reduce it to get rid of the
Boost dependency, it'd be appreciated.
You can cvise for runtime testcases, just add several checks with different
compilers and UBS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44fe2c06a156a63f7ae359fd5dd3ce98afa3e92a
commit r13-8925-g44fe2c06a156a63f7ae359fd5dd3ce98afa3e92a
Author: René Rebe
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58712&action=edit
slightly different testcase
So it looks like an interaction between ccmp and late_combine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58710|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58710&action=edit
Cleanup reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
int _Py_NoneStruct,
__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse_signature___pyx_t_9,
__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse_signature___pyx_t_12;
int *__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45215
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note starting GCC 14 on aarch64 we get:
ldp s31, s30, [x1]
add x1, x2, 4
dup v0.4s, v0.s[0]
ld1 {v30.s}[1], [x1]
ld1 {v31.s}[1], [x2]
zip1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #1 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See r10-4792
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
Bug ID: 116010
Summary: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and
aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2018-03-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98986
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
I know the missed optimization is fixed in GCC 10 at the RTL level.
But shouldn't these optimized at gimple level to similar to:
```
__m256i cvt_setr1(__m128i low)
{
return __builtin_shufflevector (low,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98289
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116003
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01c095ab77f8f43bf77e4c0be6c4f4c0d15a4c29
commit r15-2165-g01c095ab77f8f43bf77e4c0be6c4f4c0d15a4c29
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes
--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240719 (experimental)
cea6473e48b4cfbf16f7b4a804f1562f8da8f25b (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
3147d1f67ddd03e579d1ff19aea8b9cfeb490564)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116004
--- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe ---
Actually:
abnez = (vui8_t) vec_cmpnez (vra, vrb);
result = vec_cntlz_lsbb (abnez);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> --enable-libquadmath --enable-libquadmath-support
You should not need this since the libc should already have support for 128bit
FP (either double double or IEEE 128bit).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This might just be fixed on the trunk.
Thanks for the super fast feedback. Do you have a pointer to the commit fixing
this? I quickly looked at the recent ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108017
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related is optimizing:
_1 = (long unsigned int) j_5(D);
_2 = _1 * 4;
t_7 = i_6(D) + _2;
_3 = (long unsigned int) k_8(D);
_4 = _3 * 4;
t1_9 = i_6(D) + _4;
_10 = MAX_EXPR ;
into:
i_6(D) + MAX_EX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116008
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note clang/LLVM can optimize the case where j/k are constants but gcc still
does not. e.g.
```
int f2(int i, int j, int k)
{
j = 1;
k = 2;
int t = i+j;
int t1 = i+k;
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116008
Bug ID: 116008
Summary: MAX should simplify to MAX+i
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116007
Bug ID: 116007
Summary: libquadmath fails to build with
libgcc/soft-fp/quad.h:69:1: error: unable to emulate
'TF'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d15664f71c150a1b0e6cc07c0534b356b111344d
commit r14-10478-gd15664f71c150a1b0e6cc07c0534b356b111344d
Author: Paul Thomas
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5034af8223c0db07cdec01cef70048ec44cdd47b
commit r14-10477-g5034af8223c0db07cdec01cef70048ec44cdd47b
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> Fixed on trunk. I'll push the backports after a little burn-in time on
> trunk.
All of Bill's CI testers were green wrt this test case, so I've started
backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1205104bbef40abe3baa5965a676f3b0f68971dd
commit r14-10476-g1205104bbef40abe3baa5965a676f3b0f68971dd
Author: René Rebe
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101200
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> For aarch64 we get:
> adrpx1, .LANCHOR0
> add x0, x1, :lo12:.LANCHOR0
> add x0, x0, 8
> ldrbw1, [x1, #:lo12:.LANC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55858
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca0fa18adda03faae3464d8f44c215672b71baa5
commit r14-10475-gca0fa18adda03faae3464d8f44c215672b71baa5
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116000
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
--- Comment #42 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #41)
> I ran into exact the same trouble of C23 missing symbols on old systems. In
> my case it is a custom build (with tailored source) of libfreeimage which
> has som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115406
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:348d890c287a7ec4c88d3082ae6105537bd39398
commit r15-2161-g348d890c287a7ec4c88d3082ae6105537bd39398
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115406
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115783
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ee70c9f83a1033f2897a35bff9e9ffdd03cc651
commit r15-2159-g2ee70c9f83a1033f2897a35bff9e9ffdd03cc651
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116003
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod ---
When registering an equivalence, the oracle creates an initial equivalence for
an SSA_NAME with itself in the def block. This prevents dominator queries
from searching past the definition block.
In this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110057
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I think that's valid, so shouldn't be devirtualized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115939
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Agreed, that's what the patch in comment 3 is for, and that's why I implemented
that before working on the std::expected changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116006
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103548
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] "is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115990
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the argument about nobody reads documentation does not hold much weight
about doing what we think is right. If that was the argument then -fwrapv and
-fno-strict-aliasing would be defaults in compilers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116006
Bug ID: 116006
Summary: RFE: detect usage of pointers to local variables that
are out of scope
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115990
--- Comment #16 from gnzlbg ---
Maybe if it was called "-Ounsafe-fast" people may end up reading the docs to
find out what that unsafe means.
If we had that option as an alias to "-Ofast", then maybe -Ofast could just
warn with:
> -Ofast is de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108563
--- Comment #5 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Just checked again, this seems to be resolved in the 13 and 14 lines, as well
as trunk. Still fails in 12.4.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mscfd at gmx dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115997
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Note to self: Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2024-July/406082.html
when backporting this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang rejects it with:
:11:1: error: deduction guide template contains a template parameter
that cannot be deduced
11 | A(std::vector const &) -> A;
| ^
:10:33: note: non-deducible template paramet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83209
--- Comment #12 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Yes, indeed.
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:28, vehre at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83209
>
> Andre Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115989
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116005
Bug ID: 116005
Summary: Class template argument deduction for alias templates
error in C++20
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c93be1606ecf8e0f65b96b67aa023fb456ceb3a3
commit r15-2156-gc93be1606ecf8e0f65b96b67aa023fb456ceb3a3
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115988
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116004
--- Comment #1 from Steven Munroe ---
Compile test code examples:
int
test_intrn_first_mismatch_or_eos_index_PWR9 (vui8_t vra, vui8_t vrb)
{
return vec_first_mismatch_or_eos_index (vra, vrb);
}
int
test_first_mismatch_byte_or_eos_index_PWR9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115988
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2f47a5c1d5204131660ea0372a08e692df8844e
commit r15-2155-gb2f47a5c1d5204131660ea0372a08e692df8844e
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114759
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2f47a5c1d5204131660ea0372a08e692df8844e
commit r15-2155-gb2f47a5c1d5204131660ea0372a08e692df8844e
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a9f3ded1a0ccc2c8b0a42f976950041734798e
commit r15-2154-g58a9f3ded1a0ccc2c8b0a42f976950041734798e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116004
Bug ID: 116004
Summary: PPC64 vector Intrinsic vec_first_mismatch_or_eos_index
generates poor code
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115982
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|14.0
1 - 100 of 1008 matches
Mail list logo
