https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115766
--- Comment #9 from Bi6c ---
https://godbolt.org/
Yes, I also tried to use the compiler explorer. When I compiled with
gcc-12.3.0, I got the results below.
-O0: c[7][4].a: 2
-O2: c[7][4].a: 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115977
--- Comment #4 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) ---
I don't see how that tracks. I think -ffp-contract=off is changing the upper
passes enough that the optimiser no longer trips over it, similar to how
-mcpu=970 affects it. Checking the tree dumps and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115972
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> And again GCC 10 is EOL. Please don't put a "10 regression" marker in the
> subject even for valid reports in the future. You can put 10.x into "known
> to work" for i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115972
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115978
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
To clarify, the question originally came from whether or not to report error
for -m32,-march=native, and then LLVM folks said it's diffcult for LLVM not
issuing error for -march=native -m32, but issuing error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115843
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:228972b2b7bf50f4776f8ccae0d7c2950827d0f1
commit r15-2127-g228972b2b7bf50f4776f8ccae0d7c2950827d0f1
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110632
jiawei changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiawei at iscas dot ac.cn
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115980
Bug ID: 115980
Summary: RISC-V: RVV dynamic-lmul test fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115894
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115978
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Please add tests similar to
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc11b924bfe7752edbba052ca71653f46a60887a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115978
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58697|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115978
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115979
Bug ID: 115979
Summary: Implicitly generated C++ calls stop musttail search
early
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d062b0abf45cd54057352fc4b7827a3b1b9a160a
commit r15-2126-gd062b0abf45cd54057352fc4b7827a3b1b9a160a
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81824596361cf4919d6dc026155160581c99b860
commit r15-2125-g81824596361cf4919d6dc026155160581c99b860
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115255
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:983daf0e5fdaada5b930374c21455d42d34350be
commit r15-2123-g983daf0e5fdaada5b930374c21455d42d34350be
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Sat Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b738a63e528db410a1c51fc27db37fe22f0cb397
commit r15-2124-gb738a63e528db410a1c51fc27db37fe22f0cb397
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6502accf381358173b19e615fdeb0aa17949c93
commit r15-2122-ga6502accf381358173b19e615fdeb0aa17949c93
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115165, which changed state.
Bug 115165 Summary: ICE on -ftime-report with module and c++2b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115165
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115165
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115165
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0c3a1c16af234b55f48cf1cfe299417f93f163c
commit r14-10453-gf0c3a1c16af234b55f48cf1cfe299417f93f163c
Author: Nathaniel Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115165
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7b2434cc7e712dc5055bde02c441393ae881f06
commit r15-2121-gb7b2434cc7e712dc5055bde02c441393ae881f06
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115978
Bug ID: 115978
Summary: x86 backend crashes when using -m32 -march=native (if
machine support APX)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The problem is here:
> ```
> /* Return TRUE if OP is a valid vector addressing mode. */
>
> bool
> aarch64_simd_mem_operand_p (rtx op)
> {
> return MEM_P (op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Keywords|nee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
#5 0x00f7d015 in output_asm_insn (operands=,
templ=0x287a292 "ld1r\t{%0.2s}, %1") at ../../gcc/final.cc:3420
3420 if (*templ == 0)
(gdb) up
(insn:TI 233 1301 1297 (set (reg:V2SI 63 v31)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115977
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115977
--- Comment #2 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) ---
awilcox@gwyn gtx $ c++ -fno-stack-protector -mcpu=970 -mtune=power9 -O2 -o test
gtx_euler_angle.cpp; ./test; echo $?
0
awilcox@gwyn gtx $ c++ -mcpu=970 -mtune=power9 -O2 -o test gtx_euler_angle.cpp;
./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115977
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-18
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|new test case |[13 regression] new test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115977
Bug ID: 115977
Summary: [12/13 Regression] [sra] Regression targeting PowerPC
970
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108220
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115976
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing uadd_sat/usub_sat |Missing
|vectorizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30dd420a06ad7d2adf4a672d176caee632f8168a
commit r15-2120-g30dd420a06ad7d2adf4a672d176caee632f8168a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114104
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:144b6099cdaa9ac1b298687c0cfdb06a970e338b
commit r15-2118-g144b6099cdaa9ac1b298687c0cfdb06a970e338b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is testcase for ustrunc at least (note llvm does not use uqxtn here even
though it could):
```
void ustrunc0(unsigned long long *__restrict__ a, unsigned * __restrict__ b)
{
int i = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115731
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-18
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110855
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.0, 15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112557
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
ssadd_optab -> SQADD
usadd_optab -> UQADD
sssub_optab -> SQSUB
ussub_optab -> UQSUB
(q)
ustrunc_optab -> UQXTN
sstrunc_optab -> SQXTN
(aarch64_qmovn)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115916
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
The change also fixed highway-1.2.0 testsuite for me. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115550
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So testing my fix for this bug has exposed another secondary issue. Assuming
there's not something else lurking, then plan is to address that secondary
issue, then come back to this one, then dive into the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115976
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note f2 should really be:
```
void f2(unsigned *__restrict__ a, unsigned * __restrict__ b)
{
for(int i = 0;i < 1024;i ++)
{
long long ta = a[i];
long long tb = b[i];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bbc8ea2e38d194fb5f2f52ab3f75301d4f84f06
commit r15-2113-g3bbc8ea2e38d194fb5f2f52ab3f75301d4f84f06
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115976
Bug ID: 115976
Summary: Missing uadd_sat/usub_sat vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115975
Bug ID: 115975
Summary: sat_add, etc. vector patterns not done for aarch64
(sve)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115974
Bug ID: 115974
Summary: sat_add vector patterns not done for aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Created attachment 58695 [details]
> Tentative patch
>
> This patch fixes the ICE by ensuring to derive the element size of constant
> character elements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115973
Bug ID: 115973
Summary: PPCLE: Inefficient code for __builtin_uaddll_overflow
and __builtin_addcll
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
--- Comment #10 from Valentin Tolmer ---
Thanks a lot, that was fast!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108256
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 115971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115971
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović ---
*** Bug 115918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115918
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115972
Bug ID: 115972
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Misaligned address error check
missing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115971
Bug ID: 115971
Summary: [12 Regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115965
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Teodosio ---
Ah sorry, I got fixated in the different behavior when swapping the order and
didn't challenge the function.
Thank you Andrew for elaborating on that and on -fsanitize=address, that is
really appreciated!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71469
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mlevine55 at bloomberg
dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71469
Michael Levine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
One difference here is that VS code is sending the diagnostics one at a time as
JSON-RPC messages containing SARIF "result" objects as they occur, whereas
currently we write all our SARIF output at once on e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bbfe788d1a76979e5be14169248bc34106e9c03
commit r14-10451-g1bbfe788d1a76979e5be14169248bc34106e9c03
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2249c6348835c817f43c9fc55eac66e54ac1efeb
commit r14-10450-g2249c6348835c817f43c9fc55eac66e54ac1efeb
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79c5a09f959dc63824bd005522a072424f16d89d
commit r14-10449-g79c5a09f959dc63824bd005522a072424f16d89d
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't this just writing through a named pipe?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115970
Bug ID: 115970
Summary: RFE: add support for sending SARIF output to a pipe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115969
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Slightly too big to attach:
https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/llvm-PR115969/SemaExpr.cpp.ii.xz.
ult-pie --enable-host-pie
--enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes
--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240717 (experimental)
f438299ef6860b8233ffe1c5fda7d63f2f6c56ae (Gentoo Har
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115960
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Noah Williams from comment #5)
> It isn't? The library I was trying to compile included the "optional"
> header, and I had looked it up and found it was part of C++ 17, so I thought
> it was par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115960
--- Comment #5 from Noah Williams ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> > The problem seems to be that, despite passing "-std=c++17", it doesn't use
> > c++17
> > header files for the Optional identifier.
>
> Why should it? The n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115929
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115928
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115929
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43a7ece873eba47a11c0b21b0068eee53740551a
commit r15-2111-g43a7ece873eba47a11c0b21b0068eee53740551a
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115928
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71b31690a7c52413496e91bcc5ee4c68af2f366f
commit r15-2110-g71b31690a7c52413496e91bcc5ee4c68af2f366f
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression] constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d890b04197fb0ddba4fbfb32f88e266fa27e02f3
commit r15-2108-gd890b04197fb0ddba4fbfb32f88e266fa27e02f3
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115964
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44fcc1ca11e7ea35dc9fb25a5317346bc1eaf7b2
commit r15-2106-g44fcc1ca11e7ea35dc9fb25a5317346bc1eaf7b2
Author: Eikansh Gupta
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37bd7d5c4e17c97d2b7d50f630b1cf8b347a31f4
commit r13-8920-g37bd7d5c4e17c97d2b7d50f630b1cf8b347a31f4
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111890
--- Comment #8 from Harry Butterworth ---
I applied patch to 14.1.0 and my code compiles now. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||summersnow9403 at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akihiko.odaki at daynix dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
