https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65866
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:616c3290785c204b3019e7aaff8a7d9bb425d336
commit r13-8910-g616c3290785c204b3019e7aaff8a7d9bb425d336
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115752
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89f9342980b7976f98ba43fac6a64a7a2214b6e6
commit r14-10417-g89f9342980b7976f98ba43fac6a64a7a2214b6e6
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106783
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
/* To simplify debugging, compare IPA and local solutions. */
if (past_flags_known && summary)
{
size_t len = summary->arg_flags.length ();
if (past_flags.length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115888
--- Comment #3 from Jason Liam ---
Reduced program to show the intent more clearly:
```
#include
struct C{
int f(this int);
};
decltype(C::f) func; //msvc accepts but clang and gcc rejects
int func(int j)
{
std::cout << "called with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115863
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> Created attachment 58650 [details]
> Testcase that illustrates performance issue
Without ustrunc{m}{m}2 optab the loop in the testcase compiles to (gcc -O2):
.L7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115863
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 58650
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58650&action=edit
Testcase that illustrates performance issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115863
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #8)
> Thanks Richard.
> Yes, the .SAT_TRUNC doesn't pay any attention the other possible use of
> MIN_EXPR.
>
> As your suggestion, we may need one additional check here (lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115863
--- Comment #8 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> > Please note that w/o .SAT_TRUNC the compiler is able to optimize hot loop in
> > compress2 to:
> >
> >[local count:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115888
--- Comment #2 from Jason Liam ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2688
This is not CWG2688. Note that in the given example here, gcc and clang
rejects `decltype(C::f)`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
trying to combine definition of r63 in:
21: v31:DI=x0:DI
into:
22: v30:V2DI=v31:V2DI
successfully matched this instruction to *aarch64_simd_movv2di:
(set (reg:V2DI 62 v30 [orig:106 _3 ] [106])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58648|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115879
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58647|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58646|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58646&action=edit
single file ICEing
` -fwhole-program -O3 -fno-vect-cost-model -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero`
during RTL pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> That's straight from cvise so not tidied at all. I need to do some other
> bits now. It should be doable to kill LTO dependence next
Just combine the 2 sources and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
expr.i:
```
void mpz_tdiv_r();
void mpz_get_str();
void main() { mpz_tdiv_r(mpz_get_str); }
```
libcoreutils_a-mini-gmp-gnulib.i:
```
typedef long mp_limb_t;
int mpn_div_qr_invert___clz_c;
mp_limb_t mpn_div_qr_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115901
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58645&action=edit
libcoreutils_a-mini-gmp-gnulib.i
tap
--disable-valgrind-annotations --disable-vtable-verify --disable-libvtv
--with-zstd --without-isl --enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie
--enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes
--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68524
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just FYI, Apple's corefoundation headers now "require" this support. See PR
115880 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> ...it looks like the caret is underlining the CF_INLINE macro
Note the caret is just wrong place; I have not looked why though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Reverting r14-409 fixes the problem on trunk, so that change must mean
something.
I added the modifying-const-objects constexpr checking, so maybe I should poke
more at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Started with r14-409:
>
> commit 4b8d0d4d7fd245ef85c7801e7838845502a5a61d
> Author: Jason Merrill
> Date: Mon May 1 17:41:44 2023 -0400
>
> c++: std::va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced slightly more:
```
struct A {
char m;
constexpr A() { m = 0; }
};
struct C {
constexpr C(){ };
};
struct B : C {
A a;
constexpr B() {}
};
struct D : B { };
static constexpr A a;
sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115900
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] constexpr |[14/15 Regression]
|o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115838
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We might be able to just disable the new code for clang 17 like this:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/version.def
index 0604bc2c520..fc2fa0c195f 100644
---
^
```
This compiles fine with GCC 13.3.0, but fails with GCC 14.1.0 or trunk (on
godbolt as of this writing, g++
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-88ff0504ab3286df57e27514065494a30c365ec5-binutils-2.42)
15.0.0 20240712 (experimental) ).
https://godbolt.org/z/TvjM4qjb6
AFAIK, a c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Fairly sure the root cause is the TImode assignments. Based on what I'm
seeing, we may have a problem with vectors as well -- worth keeping mind if
there's additional bug reports against ext-dce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56479
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.2 |14.1.0
Last reconfirmed|2013-03-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
I find doing a bootstrap build with -O3 -march=native, with
asan & ubsan, is a useful weekly sanity check.
I only have access to arm & x86_64, so the option exists
to extend this testing to other machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115899
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Misaligned |Signed integer overflow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the following code in gimple-fold.cc has issue:
4440 tree dst = build2_loc (buf->loc, MEM_REF, atype, buf->base,
4441 build_int_cst (buf->alias_type,
4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115899
--- Comment #1 from Bi6c ---
Created attachment 58643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58643&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115899
--- Comment #2 from Bi6c ---
OS: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
We found that GCC failed to detect a signed integer overflow error in
gcc-14.1.0 at optimization level 0.
$ ~/compiler-builds/gcc-13.2.0_build/bin/gcc -fsanitize=undefined -g -lgcc_s -w
-O0 te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115899
Bug ID: 115899
Summary: [14 Regression] Misaligned address check missing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115876
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6f551d079de1d151b272bcdd3d42316857c9d4e
commit r15-2011-ga6f551d079de1d151b272bcdd3d42316857c9d4e
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Jul 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
--- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
when checking the expanded IR for __builtin_clear_padding in the below:
the builtin
__builtin_clear_padding (&o, 0B);
was expanded as the following sequence
D.4430 = &o + 0;
_2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luigighiron at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is a dup of bug 107211.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Short testcase:
```
struct f
{
void g();
void g(int);
} tt;
bool t = noexcept(tt.g);
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
Bug ID: 115898
Summary: Invalid use of non-static member function in noexcept
is not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115527
--- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I believe that this is a bug in __builtin_clear_padding.
when I change the testing case to:
struct inner {
double a;
char b;
long l;
};
struct outer {
struct inner in_array[3];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115874
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill ---
config.h includes auto-host.h which appears to be defining the macros:
/* Define to 1 if we found a declaration for 'fputc_unlocked', otherwise
define to 0. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
#define HAVE_DECL_F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115896
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
A couple of notes here.
1) Georg-Johann Lay is right there is only one documentation for all of GCC. So
compiling for x86_64 will cause the documentation to be the same as compiling
for avr.
2) The version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115891
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115883
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14/15 Regression]
|_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86843
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08776bef53835ff6318ecfeade8f6c6896ffd81f
commit r15-2009-g08776bef53835ff6318ecfeade8f6c6896ffd81f
Author: Daniel Bertalan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
It seems '__is_same' is not the problem here. New test case
(https://compiler-explorer.com/z/fsoc3hzMK):
---
template
constexpr bool same_size_v = s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115897
Bug ID: 115897
Summary: [14/15 Regression] __is_same fails for vector builtin
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> IMHO, an x86_64 build shouldn't be doing *anything* with any avr
> documentation.
The GCC user documentation as well as the Internals manual covers all targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115785
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115785
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e7053a641393211f52c176e540c8922288ab8db
commit r15-2008-g6e7053a641393211f52c176e540c8922288ab8db
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1)
> So I think this is invalid as a GCC PR. When you are annoyed by that
> warning, use a texinfo version with a fix.
It looks like you missed my point. Maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115896
Bug ID: 115896
Summary: Failure to optimize shift+compare involving constants
to and+compare
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115798, which changed state.
Bug 115798 Summary: [15 Regression][modules] ICE when re-exporting a type
exported from base module's GMF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115798
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115798
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115798
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13757e50ff0b4e0dccfabc67b1322a2724bf3a5c
commit r15-2005-g13757e50ff0b4e0dccfabc67b1322a2724bf3a5c
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114683
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6bf4b1c93221118b3008a878ec508f6412dfc55
commit r15-2003-gd6bf4b1c93221118b3008a878ec508f6412dfc55
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Bug ID: 115895
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr115385.c execution test with
-march=znver4 --param partial-vector-usage=2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #5 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115889
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
With -mno-avx512bf16 the gcc.dg/vect/vect-vfa-03.c testcase succeeds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
A native build on x86_64 produces warnings about avr documentation.(In reply to
David Binderman from comment #0)
> A native build on x86_64 produces warnings about avr documentation.
This is an issue in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115894
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115894
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115894
Bug ID: 115894
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/arm/pr111235.c test failure
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #23 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes
---
Created attachment 58642
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58642&action=edit
My latest gcc tls support patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #22 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes
---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #19)
>
> Alexandre, how's your progress on Windows TLS going? Could we collaborate to
> get this into gcc somehow?
Hi Julian,
I used to manage a collect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 58641
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58641&action=edit
Fix for this PR
The only way that I have found to fix this is to simplify the len_trim
expression. In doing so,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115882
--- Comment #7 from uis ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> http://wg21.link/P0735
> http://wg21.link/P0750
> http://wg21.link/P0190
> http://wg21.link/P0462
>
>
> There might be more.
After re-reading P0750 it seems I misunders
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
Bug ID: 115893
Summary: AVR documentation in x86_64 build
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115522
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08463348c5cce84dc3c64ac4fbb20e2795ee104f
commit r13-8908-g08463348c5cce84dc3c64ac4fbb20e2795ee104f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85723
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08463348c5cce84dc3c64ac4fbb20e2795ee104f
commit r13-8908-g08463348c5cce84dc3c64ac4fbb20e2795ee104f
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113376
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115522
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21c8708ba638f57cf904c8af3355318d9cf0f9e0
commit r14-10412-g21c8708ba638f57cf904c8af3355318d9cf0f9e0
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113376
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d920658cbb200729b7c2ad069fa4b6498e028ff1
commit r14-10413-gd920658cbb200729b7c2ad069fa4b6498e028ff1
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85723
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21c8708ba638f57cf904c8af3355318d9cf0f9e0
commit r14-10412-g21c8708ba638f57cf904c8af3355318d9cf0f9e0
Author: Jonathan Wake
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
