[Bug c++/115792] New: GCC accepts [] throw () {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115792 Bug ID: 115792 Summary: GCC accepts [] throw () {} Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assigne

[Bug fortran/115788] [F2018] Implement OUT_OF_RANGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115788 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Version|unknown

[Bug c/115787] [GIMPLE-FE] ICE: in gimple_build_switch_nlabels, at gimple.cc:807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-07-05 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/115786] ICE: Segmentation fault (add_stmt at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-decl.cc:689 and c_parser_declaration_or_fndef at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.cc:3027)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115786 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Blocks|1010

[Bug sanitizer/115791] division by zero check missing at optimization levels -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115791 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- So fixed for GCC 11. Note GCC 10.5.0 was the last release of GCC 10.x series and there will be no other new 10.x.

[Bug sanitizer/115791] division by zero check missing at optimization levels -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115791 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug sanitizer/115791] division by zero check missing at optimization levels -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115791 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Craig Topper from comment #5) > Isn’t -mstrict-align the default? It is in LLVM. Then it may be a different issue...

[Bug sanitizer/115791] New: division by zero check missing at optimization levels -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115791 Bug ID: 115791 Summary: division by zero check missing at optimization levels -O2 and -O3 Product: gcc Version: 10.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #5 from Craig Topper --- Isn’t -mstrict-align the default? It is in LLVM.

[Bug c++/115790] GCC doesn't emit a diagnostic for deprecated copy ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115790 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Also it is documented this way too: -Wdeprecated-copy (C++ and Objective-C++ only) Warn that the implicit declaration of a copy constructor or copy assignment operator is deprecated if the class has a user-p

[Bug c++/115790] GCC doesn't emit a diagnostic for deprecated copy ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115790 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/115790] New: GCC doesn't emit a diagnostic for deprecated copy ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115790 Bug ID: 115790 Summary: GCC doesn't emit a diagnostic for deprecated copy ctor Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/115763] RISC-V: Use wrong SEW for vfmv.v.f when -march only has zvfhmin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763 --- Comment #7 from Monk Chiang --- (In reply to Li Pan from comment #6) > Seems no surprise. > > Monk Chiang, could you please help to double check if upstream has fixed > this issue ? Thanks. Sure, I will check it by enable zvfhmin.

[Bug c++/115757] [modules] maybe_unused attributes not honored in member function of imported class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115757 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-07-05 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug target/59291] [SH] Group T bit related insns before combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59291 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to pietro from comment #3) > The following peehole: > > (define_peephole > [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arith_reg_dest") > (plus:SI (match_dup 0) > (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_reg_ope

[Bug target/115763] RISC-V: Use wrong SEW for vfmv.v.f when -march only has zvfhmin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763 --- Comment #6 from Li Pan --- Seems no surprise. Monk Chiang, could you please help to double check if upstream has fixed this issue ? Thanks.

[Bug target/59291] [SH] Group T bit related insns before combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59291 --- Comment #3 from pietro --- The following peehole: (define_peephole [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arith_reg_dest") (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_reg_operand"))) (set (match_operand:SI 2 "arith_r

[Bug c++/115775] User-defined deduction guide ignored for alias template if the alias passes on a template template parameter to the aliased class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115775 --- Comment #4 from Sean Murthy --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2) > Clang says: > > :35:10: error: deduction guide template contains a template > parameter that cannot be deduced ... > but I'm not sure if this is correct (or more cor

[Bug c++/115775] User-defined deduction guide ignored for alias template if the alias passes on a template template parameter to the aliased class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115775 --- Comment #3 from Sean Murthy --- I notice the repro has an unnecessary explicit specifier for guide 2. That guide should be: //guide 2 template C(SI) -> C>;

[Bug ada/114065] gnat build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 fails on 32bit archs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065 --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Boulenguez --- Created attachment 58591 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58591&action=edit version 11 of patch 2/8 Version 11 changes a line at the end of patch 2/8, for compatibility for latest

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-07-04 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #2 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1) > If you still have the system, knowing the value of the registers at this > point would be helpful. "info all-r" in gdb would give you that informati

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/115789] New: gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 Bug ID: 115789 Summary: gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/115751] [15 Regression] ICE building 521.wrf_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug target/115780] ICE during RTL pass: split1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/115724] analyzer does not recognise glibc (GNU) extension, non-returning error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115724 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- Fixed by the above patch for trunk for gcc 15. Handling of "error" was added in r11-7333-g5ee4ba031dd9fc to fix PR analyzer/99196 so keeping this open to track backporting to earlier branches.

[Bug fortran/115788] New: [F2018] Implement OUT_OF_RANGE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115788 Bug ID: 115788 Summary: [F2018] Implement OUT_OF_RANGE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug analyzer/115724] analyzer does not recognise glibc (GNU) extension, non-returning error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115724 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6fdb1a2a2906103afd70fa68cf7c45e896b8fbb commit r15-1845-ga6fdb1a2a2906103afd70fa68cf7c45e896b8fbb Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug target/115780] ICE during RTL pass: split1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I suspect this is a dup of bug 115751 . Yes I agree, looks very similar and appeared within the same timeframe.

[Bug target/115780] ICE during RTL pass: split1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/105510] error: initializer element is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105510 --- Comment #6 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira --- Also ran into this issue today, also involving compound literals in nested structure initialization macros. Because clang accepts this, it compiled fine on my development machine but failed

[Bug c/115787] New: ICE: in gimple_build_switch_nlabels, at gimple.cc:807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115787 Bug ID: 115787 Summary: ICE: in gimple_build_switch_nlabels, at gimple.cc:807 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/115778] Internal compiler error: in keep_template_parm, at cp/pt.cc:10960

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115778 --- Comment #3 from Sean Murthy --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > The same code has no error in GCC 14.1. > > It ICEs with -fchecking starting in GCC 11.1.0. But I don't know if it is a > regression or it was just the checking

[Bug c/115786] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (add_stmt at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-decl.cc:689 and c_parser_declaration_or_fndef at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.cc:3027)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115786 Bug ID: 115786 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (add_stmt at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-decl.cc:689 and c_parser_declaration_or_fndef at ./gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.cc:3027)

[Bug c++/115779] boost-flat_map begin/end is the same for non empty container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115779 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org Resolutio

[Bug rtl-optimization/115785] New: ICE when building embree-4.3.1 on amd64 with -flate-combine-instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115785 Bug ID: 115785 Summary: ICE when building embree-4.3.1 on amd64 with -flate-combine-instructions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug analyzer/115784] New: -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop does not take into account noreturn attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115784 Bug ID: 115784 Summary: -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop does not take into account noreturn attribute Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/115783] New: GCC accepts invalid program involving calling explicit object member function from static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115783 Bug ID: 115783 Summary: GCC accepts invalid program involving calling explicit object member function from static member function Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/101232] Bad error message with stray semicolon in initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101232 Franciszek Witt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||franek.witt at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/101485] Calling std::equal with std::byte* does not use memcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101485 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/115782] New: ICE on valid code at -O{2, 3} with "-fno-guess-branch-probability -fgcse-sm -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-gcse" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in possibly_queue_changes, a

-disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 15.0.0 20240704 (experimental) (GCC) [519] % [519] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [520] % [520] % gcctk -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fgcse-sm -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-gcse sma

[Bug fortran/115781] New: Error with passing array of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781 Bug ID: 115781 Summary: Error with passing array of derived type Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug target/113913] [14] RISC-V: suboptimal code gen for intrinsic vcreate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113913 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/115780] New: ICE during RTL pass: split1

egmentation fault 166 | } it goes away with -O1. gcc version 15.0.0 20240704 (experimental) 699087a16591adfdf21228876b6c48dbcd353faa

[Bug c++/115779] New: boost-flat_map begin/end is the same for non empty container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115779 Bug ID: 115779 Summary: boost-flat_map begin/end is the same for non empty container Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Component|middle-end

[Bug libstdc++/98678] 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46ffda9bf19abeed95e9d758ed5e776ee221ee9e commit r15-1843-g46ffda9bf19abeed95e9d758ed5e776ee221ee9e Author: John David Anglin D

[Bug target/113116] [14/15 Regression] ~11-17% exec time regression of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113116 --- Comment #6 from Filip Kastl --- Yes, currently the measurements are even better than they were before this slowdown. I suggest we close this PR. I'll wait a bit in case there are objections and then do it.

[Bug target/112915] [14/15 Regression] 4% exec time regression of 454.calculix on AMD Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112915 --- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl --- Yes, currently the measurements are back to where they were before this slowdown. They maybe even improved a bit. I suggest we close this PR. I'll wait a bit in case there are objections and then do it.

[Bug target/114412] [14/15 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412 --- Comment #7 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) >There is still more from GCC 13 though. I'm not sure what you mean by that. GCC 13 looks fine to me. Here is a comparison of measurements on trunk, 12, 13 and 14

[Bug target/115475] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16 when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115475 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdeb7ce83f71d1527626975e70d294ef55535d03 commit r12-10600-gcdeb7ce83f71d1527626975e70d294ef55535d03 Author: Kyrylo Tkacho

[Bug target/115457] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_BF16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115457 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebf561429ee4fbd125aa51ee985e32f1cfd4daed commit r12-10599-gebf561429ee4fbd125aa51ee985e32f1cfd4daed Author: Kyrylo Tkacho

[Bug target/115475] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16 when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115475 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40d54856c1189ab6125d3eeb064df25082dd0e50 commit r13-8891-g40d54856c1189ab6125d3eeb064df25082dd0e50 Author: Kyrylo Tkachov

[Bug target/115457] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_BF16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115457 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7785289f8d1f6350a3f48232ce578009b0e23534 commit r13-8890-g7785289f8d1f6350a3f48232ce578009b0e23534 Author: Kyrylo Tkachov

[Bug target/115475] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16 when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115475 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc63b5dbe60da076f46cb3bcb10f0f84cfd7fb7d commit r14-10380-gdc63b5dbe60da076f46cb3bcb10f0f84cfd7fb7d Author: Kyrylo Tkacho

[Bug target/115457] AArch64 should define __ARM_FEATURE_BF16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115457 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a97c8ed42562ceabb00c9c516435541909c134b commit r14-10379-g1a97c8ed42562ceabb00c9c516435541909c134b Author: Kyrylo Tkacho

[Bug tree-optimization/115537] [15 Regression] vectorizable_reduction ICEs after g:d66b820f392aa9a7c34d3cddaf3d7c73bf23f82d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115537 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adcfb4fb8fb20a911c795312ff5f5284dba05275 commit r15-1842-gadcfb4fb8fb20a911c795312ff5f5284dba05275 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug c++/115623] ICE: Segmentation fault in finish_for_cond with novector and almost infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115623 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/115623] ICE: Segmentation fault in finish_for_cond with novector and almost infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115623 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1742b699c31e3ac4dadbedb6036ee2498b569259 commit r14-10378-g1742b699c31e3ac4dadbedb6036ee2498b569259 Author: Tamar Christ

[Bug c++/115623] ICE: Segmentation fault in finish_for_cond with novector and almost infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115623 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84acbfbecbdbc3fb2a395bd97e338b2b26fad374 commit r15-1841-g84acbfbecbdbc3fb2a395bd97e338b2b26fad374 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #5 from Ignacy Gawędzki --- FWIW, I ran a git bisect from releases/gcc-10.5.0 to releases/gcc-11.1.0 and the first bad commit is d119f34c952f8718fdbabc63e2f369a16e92fa07, which adds modref/ipa_modref optimization passes.

[Bug target/115777] [12/13/14/15 regression] Severe performance regression on insertion sort at -O2 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 CC|

[Bug ipa/115533] [12/13/14/15 regression] flac miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fipa-pta -fno-vect-cost-model since r12-3893-g6390c5047adb75

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115533 --- Comment #26 from Alexander Monakov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24) > > That's because of -fno-vect-cost-model, it wouldn't be vectorized otherwise. Thanks, I forgot. The testcase in PR 106902 was vectorized at plain -O3 b

[Bug target/114890] [14/15 Regression] Big-endian addp intrinsics reorder operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114890 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11049cdf204bc96bc407e5dd44ed3b8a492f405a commit r15-1839-g11049cdf204bc96bc407e5dd44ed3b8a492f405a Author: Alfie Richards Date:

[Bug fortran/78466] [coarray] Explicit cobounds of a procedures parameter not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78466 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/115426] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2138

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115426 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.0 Keywords|ice-on-invalid