[Bug target/115123] [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115123 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mi

[Bug tree-optimization/115120] Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- That said, looking into IVOPTs and making it detect vector IVs would be nice as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/115120] Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/115114] aggregate initialization with parens fails when there is a base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115114 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028 kong lingling changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lingling.kong7 at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/115126] New: TU-local entity exposures in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115126 Bug ID: 115126 Summary: TU-local entity exposures in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/115115] [12/13/14/15 Regression] highway-1.0.7 wrong _mm_cvttps_epi32() constant fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115 --- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Filed https://github.com/google/highway/issues/2183 on `highway` upstream side.

[Bug c/115109] Incorrect type of enumeration constant in redeclaration of enumeration constant (C23)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115109 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c/105863] RFE: C23 #embed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863 --- Comment #9 from Joseph S. Myers --- The most straightforward and most important case to optimize is the one where the #embed expansion lies entirely inside a single character array initializer (possibly with some integer constants before or

[Bug c++/115125] [-Wstringop-overflow=] with O2/O3 - false positive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115125 --- Comment #1 from Nikolai Ivanenko --- Forgot to mention that the the code commented out in main compiles without warnings.

[Bug c++/115125] New: [-Wstringop-overflow=] with O2/O3 - false positive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115125 Bug ID: 115125 Summary: [-Wstringop-overflow=] with O2/O3 - false positive? Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #33 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29) > A minor rant, but why can't all this be set up automatically in the compile > farm machines? We have everything installed with the default for whatever

[Bug target/115123] [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115123 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #8 from Natalie Perlin --- anl...@gcc.gnu.org - Thank you, this is a great observation! I will need to change the way the spack-stack is built with gnu/14.1.0

[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/115124] Typo: `++this` instead of `++*this`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115124 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/115124] New: Typo: `++this` instead of `++*this`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115124 Bug ID: 115124 Summary: Typo: `++this` instead of `++*this` Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/114860] [14/15 regression] [aarch64] 511.povray regresses by ~5.5% with -O3 -flto -march=native -mcpu=neoverse-v2 since r14-10014-ga2f4be3dae04fa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114860 --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Yeah, it's most likely an alignment issue, especially as there's no code changes. We run our benchmarking with different flags so it may be why we don't see it. the loop seems misaligned, you can try incr

[Bug target/115123] New: [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115123 Bug ID: 115123 Summary: [15 Regression] RISCV vector scan-assembler failures Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/114412] [14/15 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #4) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3) > > Hi Filip, > > > > Do you generate these runs with counters based PGO or compiler > > instrumentation? > > > >

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467. > > > > Can you please try the 14-release like

[Bug libstdc++/115122] New: Incorrect detection of C99 support when cross-compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115122 Bug ID: 115122 Summary: Incorrect detection of C99 support when cross-compiling Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/115121] ++this is accepted in uninstantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115121 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/115121] New: ++this is accepted in uninstantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115121 Bug ID: 115121 Summary: ++this is accepted in uninstantiated template Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/115120] New: Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120 Bug ID: 115120 Summary: Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/87875] Address sanitizer doen't work with nested functions with enabled stack-use-after-return check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875 --- Comment #15 from Sebastien Bardeau --- I confirm that my duplicate bug report https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110157 faces this issue in Fortran code; to my viewpoint it is not so useless to fix it. Anyway for the time being I ca

[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/115119] Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No ++this is correct. We want to increment the iterator and not the what the iterator points too here.

[Bug c++/114850] co_await a async function which result type is std::unique_ptr<...> or shared_ptr in a initializer list causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114850 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/109227] coroutines: ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.cc:11067

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremypewterschmidt at gmail dot c

[Bug libstdc++/115119] New: Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115119 Bug ID: 115119 Summary: Typo in _Grapheme_cluster_view::_Iterator::operator++(int) Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/114850] co_await a async function which result type is std::unique_ptr<...> or shared_ptr in a initializer list causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114850 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Pewterschmidt --- This issue is no longer reproducible in GCC 14. Should I mark this as `RESOLVED` ?

[Bug target/115118] [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|15.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/115118] New: [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118 Bug ID: 115118 Summary: [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection S

[Bug middle-end/115091] Support value speculation in frontend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115091 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 --- Comment #9 from Shivam Gupta --- Good explanation 👍 On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 7:32 PM, jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs < gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 > > Jeevitha changed: > >

[Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564 --- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) > Handling pointer-vs-pointer in ptrs_compare_unequal isn't enough since we > have > > # PT = nonlocal null > unsigned int * x_7(D) = x; > ... > # PT = n

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31) > > --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez --- > [...] > > Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here? > > > > srcdir/configure --b

[Bug libstdc++/115117] New: std::exp(Inf) result invalid with --disable-c99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115117 Bug ID: 115117 Summary: std::exp(Inf) result invalid with --disable-c99 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Jeevitha changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 --- Comment #7 from Jeevitha --- In GCC 11, we encountered a different issue that didn't result in an ICE. The following is the error message in GCC 11: error: too few arguments to function '__builtin_vsx_splat_2di' 11 | vsll_result = __

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] Wrong

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96d53252aefcbc2fe419c4c3b4bcd3fc03d4d187 commit r15-581-g96d53252aefcbc2fe419c4c3b4bcd3fc03d4d187 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Thu M

[Bug other/30920] Incorrect splaying that not assures the caching property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30920 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog --- Comment #4 from And

[Bug other/30920] Incorrect splaying that not assures the caching property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30920 Anton Lorenzen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton.lorenzen at ed dot ac.uk --- Comm

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez --- [...] > Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here? > > srcdir/configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.11 > > srcdir/configure --b

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #30 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29) > > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/home/aldyh/bld/clean' > > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > > > Bootstrap comparison failure! > > > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.o diffe

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28) > > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez --- > > This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et: > > > > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname > > s11-sparc.cfarm

[Bug tree-optimization/61818] unused code fails to be removed after dom1, thread updated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61818 Bug 61818 depends on bug 13962, which changed state. Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/113164] [missed optimization] struct fields should not alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113164 Bug 113164 depends on bug 13962, which changed state. Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/65686] [5/6/7 regression] inconsistent warning maybe-uninitialized: warn about 'unsigned', not warn about 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686 Bug 65686 depends on bug 13962, which changed state. Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 13962, which changed state. Bug 13962 Summary: [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0 commit r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0 commit r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113583] Main loop in 519.lbm not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #18) [...] > Regarding the mentioned element-wise costing how should we proceed here? > I'm going to remove the hunk in question, run SPEC2017 on x86 and post a > patc

Practical Coding on IBM's Quantum Computers - 4-Week Workshop (Asynchronous)

Four-Week Workshop.With a focus on practical quantum algorithms.Hands-On Experience with Qiskit and IBM Quantum SystemsOne Month Asynchronous Workshop delivered on Canvas, featuring more than 200 participants from 80 top universities and companies. Featured Events: IBM's Quantum Computer Pro

[Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492 --- Comment #20 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010 commit r15-577-gd4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010 Author: Pan Li Date: Wed May 15 10:14

[Bug middle-end/112600] Failed to optimize saturating addition using __builtin_add_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010 commit r15-577-gd4dee347b3fe1982bab26485ff31cd039c9df010 Author: Pan Li Date: Wed May 15 10:14

[Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183 commit r15-576-g52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183 Author: Pan Li Date: Wed May 15 10:14

[Bug middle-end/112600] Failed to optimize saturating addition using __builtin_add_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183 commit r15-576-g52b0536710ff3f3ace72ab00ce9ef6c630cd1183 Author: Pan Li Date: Wed May 15 10:14

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Build|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |i386-pc-solaris2.11, |

[Bug libstdc++/115099] compilation error: format thread::id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115099 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #1 from Jian

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez --- > This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et: > > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname > s11-sparc.cfarm > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ uname -a > SunOS s1

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug ada/115113] [15 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26) > > --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez --- > > prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux. > > Aarch has no spa

[Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-08-11 00:00:00 |2024-5-16 CC|

[Bug driver/80182] accidently invoked `gcc -lm -o file.c` which deletes file.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182 --- Comment #8 from Peter Damianov --- This might arguably actually be a BFD linker problem. Both lld and mold don't have the problem for the example. Gold also has the same issue.

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 --- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- So the var_decl in question is fpstate.0: unit-size align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type 0x1035003f0 precision:8 min max pointe

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez --- > prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux. > Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc

[Bug lto/114655] [12 Regression] -flto=4 at link time does not override -flto=auto from compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug web/115105] Document "Reimplement GNU threads library on native Windows" change on GCC 13 changes list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115105 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/114231] [12 Regression] ICE when building libjxl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.3.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez --- prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux. Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc bootstrap was already broken. The problem in this PR can be trigge

[Bug middle-end/115110] [15 regression] several failures after r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110 Andrew Carlotti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acarlotti at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 --- Comment #4 from Sebastien Bardeau --- Thanks for the hints. It seems to me that an intent(out) class without component initialization values is probably out of the standard (unpredictable results). So on my side the work-around I choose is t

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718 commit r15-574-gb8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug ipa/114985] [15 regression] internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985 --- Comment #23 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3 commit r15-573-gf6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114027] [11/12 Regression] miscompile at `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model -msse4.2`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114027 --- Comment #22 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d650c041d37a3df2bec46a67e42f9976d7fd2bf commit r12-10451-g2d650c041d37a3df2bec46a67e42f9976d7fd2bf Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/114375] [11/12 Regression] Wrong vectorization of permuted mask load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114375 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1b21855e131bb818aedc953f403812b494917fc commit r12-10449-gc1b21855e131bb818aedc953f403812b494917fc Author: Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/114231] [12 Regression] ICE when building libjxl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7b1d814da0aa2e7331c56180264a8b786012971 commit r12-10448-ga7b1d814da0aa2e7331c56180264a8b786012971 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/114027] [11/12 Regression] miscompile at `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model -msse4.2`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114027 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6661a7c098a46eff4afc98b55c89e3a71d63d674 commit r12-10450-g6661a7c098a46eff4afc98b55c89e3a71d63d674 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug target/114734] [11/12 regression] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b miscompile with -flto -O3 -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl since r8-6047-g65dd1346027bb5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46b2e98983ebc62440c43217f2b3bbe72f8b0191 commit r12-10447-g46b2e98983ebc62440c43217f2b3bbe72f8b0191 Author: Richard Bien

[Bug lto/114655] [12 Regression] -flto=4 at link time does not override -flto=auto from compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114655 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a0393655d8e4662ba001c3759cf00b639eddb9 commit r12-10446-g42a0393655d8e4662ba001c3759cf00b639eddb9 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug gcov-profile/114715] Gcov allocates branches to wrong row for nested switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114715 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56415e39029012aa3675d3b4b71fb248cf43049e commit r12-10445-g56415e39029012aa3675d3b4b71fb248cf43049e Author: Richard Biene

[Bug debug/115066] [debug, gsplit-dwarf, gdwarf-4, g3] DW_MACRO_define_strp used for debug_str_offsets index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10) [...] >> I wonder how best to handle this: just skip the test on sparc*-sun-solaris2* >> && !gas?

[Bug target/111501] RISC-V: non-optimal casting when shifting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111501 Christoph Müllner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/115113] [15 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115113 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 Regression] Ada |[15 Regression] Ada |

[Bug target/115115] [12/13/14/15 Regression] highway-1.0.7 wrong _mm_cvttps_epi32() constant fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- It depends on if you consider a float to int conversion or not. For (long long)float . The value if the float was out of range is unspecified so returning one value or another is both valid. So the question

[Bug ada/115106] [15 regression] SEGV in sem_elab.internal_representation.nts_map.mutate_and_rehash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115106 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/109093] csmith: a February runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 109087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/109087] [13/14/15 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug since r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/115115] [12/13/14/15 Regression] highway-1.0.7 wrong _mm_cvttps_epi32() constant fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115115 --- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > So from a point of view of float to int conversion, both are valid for out > of range values. Looking at CVTTPS2DQ instruction from https://www.intel.com/c

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #20 from Alex Coplan --- I'd just like to ping this serious wrong code bug. It's unfortunate that this wasn't addressed for the 14.1 release.

[Bug debug/115066] [debug, gsplit-dwarf, gdwarf-4, g3] DW_MACRO_define_strp used for debug_str_offsets index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115066 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/114774] Missed DSE in simple code due to interleaving stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114774 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

  1   2   >