https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #18) [...] > Regarding the mentioned element-wise costing how should we proceed here? > I'm going to remove the hunk in question, run SPEC2017 on x86 and post a > patch in order to get some data and basis for discussion. Yeah, I think this hunk was put in as a stopgap solution.
