https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02917ac4528e32d1b2d0da5f45ef5937c56942cd
commit r15-101-g02917ac4528e32d1b2d0da5f45ef5937c56942cd
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13421
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114579
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbe83599320288025a417c54d9afcb3885cb2766
commit r15-99-gbbe83599320288025a417c54d9afcb3885cb2766
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I might see if I can figure out a patch for some to try later tonight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I see the issue then.
char m_buffer[sizeof (int_range_max)];
Needs _Align to get the alignment correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 58081
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58081&action=edit
preprocessed input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
> Since this happens while building libgcc during stage1, perhaps this can be
> reproduced with a cross? Would it be possible to get the preprocessed file
> that's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114873
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ae9252f7b52151209b36d8a1cefc49f1b23fa46
commit r13-8673-g0ae9252f7b52151209b36d8a1cefc49f1b23fa46
Author: Will Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d42105742841e73ca867b6da0c5ca6ad4d86fed6
commit r13-8672-gd42105742841e73ca867b6da0c5ca6ad4d86fed6
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
--- Comment #13 from matoro ---
Current state of this has expanded to more of the math tests.
FAIL: math/test-double-fma
FAIL: math/test-double-j0
FAIL: math/test-double-j1
FAIL: math/test-double-ldouble-fma
FAIL: math/test-double-log
FAIL: mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101345
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||101129
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114917
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114917
Bug ID: 114917
Summary: [modules] Explicit specialisations in export namespace
not permitted
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105224
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 105224, which changed state.
Bug 105224 Summary: [modules] g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C: inline key methods:
c++ modules and arm aapcs clash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105224
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105224
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad30265ccfb211fca35789df2d1404cc12302219
commit r15-98-gad30265ccfb211fca35789df2d1404cc12302219
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114916
Bug ID: 114916
Summary: [14/15] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b: miscompile at -O3 with
-mrvv-vector-bits=zvl -fwhole-program
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114746
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
BTW, in /usr/include/math.h from the GNU libc 2.37:
# define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846 /* pi */
i.e. M_PI is defined with 21 digits in base 10, which corresponds to about 70
digits in base 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jorg Brown from comment #4)
> Also odd is that the above code (including a()) works fine on gcc 10.1
> through 13.2. As seen https://godbolt.org/z/z3qnosG37
This is not really odd since it do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
--- Comment #4 from Jorg Brown ---
Oddly, if I move the reference to HelloWorld into a separate routine, it works
(you can comment out a() and ba() returns what it should, on gcc 15.0)
struct strt {
const char *ptr = &data;
char data = '\0'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |gerald at pfeifer dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114915
Bug ID: 114915
Summary: Constrained auto deduction in specialized template
scope
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114910
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
LVL labels comes from the debugging info when it comes to variable tracking.
This looks like it has always been broken ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff98aab108a6a4e50a831e7cfc011c2131f8d19c
commit r15-96-gff98aab108a6a4e50a831e7cfc011c2131f8d19c
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff98aab108a6a4e50a831e7cfc011c2131f8d19c
commit r15-96-gff98aab108a6a4e50a831e7cfc011c2131f8d19c
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114910
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
C6x Linux support was removed in 2021:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210120124812.2800027-1-a...@kernel.org/T/
So maybe it is time to remove it from GCC too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
What compiler version are you starting with?
It could be that compiler is miscompiling stage 1 here; especially when it
comes to C++ usage is becoming more and more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Since this happens while building libgcc during stage1, perhaps this can be
reproduced with a cross? Would it be possible to get the preprocessed file
that's failing?
You could try /var/gcc/reghunt/sigbus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is a C++11 testcase:
```
struct strt {
char *_M_dataplus;
char _M_local_buf=0;
constexpr strt()
: _M_dataplus(&_M_local_buf) {}
constexpr strt(const strt &__str)
: _M_datap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c70abea054fe0021b7b2c2e07996afaadc17a07b
commit r13-8670-gc70abea054fe0021b7b2c2e07996afaadc17a07b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114914
Bug ID: 114914
Summary: False positive with -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing, note this ICEs only with checking enable and not release checking ...
lloWorld = Hello + World;
int main() { printf("%s\n", HelloWorld.c_str()); }
= - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - =
Version:
g++
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-610415bb7ddc5626ec301ca20833e78696978601-binutils-2.40)
15.0.0 20240501 (experimental)
Copyright (C)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114911
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.1
Keywords|ice-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56427
Bug 56427 depends on bug 114377, which changed state.
Bug 114377 Summary: [13 Regression] GCC crashes on an example of CTAD for alias
templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60e1e13f458f1fcfb05a30ace57fa682461e2732
commit r13-8669-g60e1e13f458f1fcfb05a30ace57fa682461e2732
Author: centurion
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114562
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bc362ea61e5bf552356aa862beb7845fe50a47c
commit r13-8668-g7bc362ea61e5bf552356aa862beb7845fe50a47c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bc362ea61e5bf552356aa862beb7845fe50a47c
commit r13-8668-g7bc362ea61e5bf552356aa862beb7845fe50a47c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19821ce86afa0f4ce0d2312b16864c809e605be9
commit r13-8667-g19821ce86afa0f4ce0d2312b16864c809e605be9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
ponent: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
Between 20240430 (0b2735e0797fee9b4ec5cd74f22afe0483f888dd) and 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114911
Bug ID: 114911
Summary: Anonymous unions can cause ICE when the name of their
type escapes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checkin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oleg at smolsky dot net
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114909
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Smolsky ---
It seems like an unreasonable stretch to connect a `string` temporary to the
returned `Json` reference. The types are not related and so that guess looks
overly aggressive...
The surgical workaround should w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114910
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only thing hardcfr.c uses special is __builtin_return_address and
__builtin_trap otherwise it is just normal C code ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > convert_mode_scalar has
> >
> > if (GET_MODE_PRECISION (from_mode) == GET_MODE_PRECISION (to_mode))
> > /* Conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> convert_mode_scalar has
>
> if (GET_MODE_PRECISION (from_mode) == GET_MODE_PRECISION (to_mode))
> /* Conversion between decimal float and binary float, same si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114909
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114891
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fbe1a50d86df11f434351cf62461a32747f9710
commit r15-92-g1fbe1a50d86df11f434351cf62461a32747f9710
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114910
Bug ID: 114910
Summary: can't build a c6x cross compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114909
Bug ID: 114909
Summary: False positive diagnostic from -Wdangling-reference
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
Bug ID: 114908
Summary: fails to optimize avx2 in-register permute written
with std::experimental::simd
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3bc2787b8beb7aae67fdf2a7f7271a9a4edca7c
commit r15-91-gc3bc2787b8beb7aae67fdf2a7f7271a9a4edca7c
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing __extendhfbf2 in|__trunchfbf2 should be
|lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
I think the goal should be to declare C++20 support no longer experimental in
GCC 15, but I probably wouldn't change the default dialect just yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr114907]$ cat foo.c
__bf16
foo (_Float16 x)
{
return x;
}
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr114907]$ make CC=gcc
gcc -O2 -S foo.c
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 pr114907]$ cat foo.s
.file "foo.c"
.text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
There is __trunchfbf2. Why does GCC generate __extendhfbf2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0695aba3e987f4bb06c95f29ff90a8a3234e1507
commit r15-90-g0695aba3e987f4bb06c95f29ff90a8a3234e1507
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0695aba3e987f4bb06c95f29ff90a8a3234e1507
commit r15-90-g0695aba3e987f4bb06c95f29ff90a8a3234e1507
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114904
--- Comment #1 from Albi ---
This "bug" can be closed and deleted. I am an idiot and i am sorry.
'continue' does not jump to the start of the loop, but to the next
loop-condition-check, so in a do-while loop, it actually jumps to the bottom.
Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114907
Bug ID: 114907
Summary: Missing __extendhfbf2 in libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
FreeBSD i386 is on it's way out: FreeBSD 14 is the last series supporting
it; FreeBSD 15 is dropping support for it.
Can we disable libgnat (or GNAT) support during configure time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114906
Bug ID: 114906
Summary: aarch64 locally_streaming ICE in
aarch64_expand_prologue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114324
--- Comment #5 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk ---
Note that bug 114767 also turns out to be a case in which the inability to
alternate neg and nop along a vector leads to poor performance with some
operations on the complex type. That optimisation i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101345
--- Comment #3 from Jeevitha ---
> Jeevitha, can you please do a git bisect from the two commits above to
> identify the commit that fixes this for posterity sake? Thanks.
The commit that resolved the incorrect code was
ad5f8ac1d2f2dc92d43663
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114905
Bug ID: 114905
Summary: aarch64 locally_streaming function ICE in dwarf2cfi
due to mismatched CFA instructions in
prologue/epilogue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114904
Bug ID: 114904
Summary: Bogus Warning [-Wreturn-type] in function with
do-while loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Only after the atomic wait/notify refactoring patches have landed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111475
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
> Thanks. I've been working on this on cfarm216; I have a messy set of patches
> with this improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--
*To be removed from our mailing list, please respond to this message with
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line*
--
**
11th INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ON DEEP LEARNING
(and the Future of Artificial Intelligence)
DeepLearn 2024
Porto – Maia, Por
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81f7965e63028c1289ae3b1836750da74b01bc4a
commit r15-89-g81f7965e63028c1289ae3b1836750da74b01bc4a
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114903
Bug ID: 114903
Summary: constraint of CTAD alias deduction guide is evaluated
on a wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114868
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114868
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d0215b10dbbe39d655ceda4af283f288ec7680c
commit r15-85-g0d0215b10dbbe39d655ceda4af283f288ec7680c
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
90 matches
Mail list logo
