https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> This is most likely a dup of bug 104773.
Or of bug 3507.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #4)
> the a.i file for example #1a is:
> # 1 "a.c"
> # 1 "/tmp//"
> # 1 ""
> # 1 ""
> # 1 "a.c"
> void artiSUBS() {
> for (int i=100; i>0; i--)
> *(volatile int*)0xE000E014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111582
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Fixed in GCC 10.
artiSP:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug 111500 depends on bug 111582, which changed state.
Bug 111582 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / bitfield /
superfluous stack write
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111582
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111579
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111580
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug 111500 depends on bug 111580, which changed state.
Bug 111580 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / b.n to bx lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111580
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111581
--- Comment #1 from Luke ---
in the unsigned case:
furthermore the ldrh already cleared the high half-word,
so that a uxth would be superfluous,
even if there would be a subsequent str...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111582
Bug ID: 111582
Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization /
bitfield / superfluous stack write
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111548
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d5f20fc4a6b3254d2d379309193da4be2747987
commit r14-4248-g9d5f20fc4a6b3254d2d379309193da4be2747987
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Sun Sep 24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111366
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a65b38e361320e0aa45adbc969c704385ab1f45b
commit r14-4247-ga65b38e361320e0aa45adbc969c704385ab1f45b
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111380
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:266dfed68b881702e9660889f63408054b7fa9c0
commit r14-4246-g266dfed68b881702e9660889f63408054b7fa9c0
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Sep 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111581
Bug ID: 111581
Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization /
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111580
Bug ID: 111580
Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / b.n to
bx lr
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #4 from Luke ---
the a.i file for example #1a is:
# 1 "a.c"
# 1 "/tmp//"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "a.c"
void artiSUBS() {
for (int i=100; i>0; i--)
*(volatile int*)0xE000E014 = i;
}
the command-line was:
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #3 from Luke ---
maybe i should also say the "-v" output?
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.0/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-none-eabi
Configured wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111579
Bug ID: 111579
Summary: gnatpp error at start
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111578
Bug ID: 111578
Summary: GNAT ada.textio.setline gives incorrect result
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111533
xuli1 at eswincomputing dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xuli1 at eswincomputin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
--- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> >111715
>
> That is not a valid bug # either.
Sorry, I meant Bug 111575.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect you forgot to count the other functions which get emitted here. And
you are just counting the size of main but that is wrong really.
Anyways the overall size of the executable's text section is sm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577
Bug ID: 111577
Summary: -Os gives significantly bigger code than -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55985&action=edit
Patch which fixes the issue
I am not sure this is the best patch but we don't pass down 2 inner types into
do_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110386
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>111715
That is not a valid bug # either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111434
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
--- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert ---
Created attachment 55984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55984&action=edit
Generated assembly language for the program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576
Bug ID: 111576
Summary: gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111434
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24
Summary|Infinite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111433
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111528
--- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford ---
This was the problem that g:10d59b802a7db9ae908291fb20627c1493cfa26c fixed. I
wasn't sure it was worth backporting because it only triggers for out-of-bounds
array accesses, or uninitialised Fortran arr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Bug ID: 111575
Summary: -Wbool-operation mistakenly warns about an int
operation
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569
Hans-Jürgen Herbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Hans-J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111556
--- Comment #3 from Silvio Traversaro ---
Thanks for the quick reply! I imagined something like that, but I preferred
anyhow to have a clear bug on the libgomp so that I can refer to it and for
other people that could encounter this behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
What is happening is:
```
if (_1 != 0)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
_28 = (uint8_t) _1;
// predicted unlikely by early return (on trees) predictor.
goto ; [INV]
:
_7 = func_34
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631
--- Comment #14 from danakj at orodu dot net ---
Thank you =)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88610
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 108736, which changed state.
Bug 108736 Summary: [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside
requires with variable template arguments is broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108736
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108736
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40d2dec34b58c3c31b1c731049a914204ec252c3
commit r13-7837-g40d2dec34b58c3c31b1c731049a914204ec252c3
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111485
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59f5786c20a42be13ac6fec567ffe840045012ad
commit r13-7836-g59f5786c20a42be13ac6fec567ffe840045012ad
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9e02590f7d35f1f8e8e95ab1f2e30f24113f551
commit r13-7835-gb9e02590f7d35f1f8e8e95ab1f2e30f24113f551
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
--- Comment #3 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55982&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55981
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55981&action=edit
The preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
***
OS and Platform:
Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574
Bug ID: 111574
Summary: Illegal instruction with
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
You would have caught the bad code if in your compile.sh script you added:
```
set -e
```
As that would error out if one of the programs exit with a non-zero return code
which gcc does on an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Self contained testcase:
```
void gg(void)
{
static int t = 0;
if (t != 0) __builtin_abort();
t++;
}
int a, b = -8, e, f, h;
char c, d, g;
static int i(long k) {
e = 8;
for (; e;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
__builtin_printf ("%u\n", _79);
__builtin_unreachable ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563
--- Comment #4 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Yi from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D);
> > > invaria
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Yi from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D);
> > invariant up to level 1, cost 1.
> >
> > Basically because the cost is not high enoug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563
--- Comment #2 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D);
> invariant up to level 1, cost 1.
>
> Basically because the cost is not high enough ...
>
> If yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80757
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 92586, which changed state.
Bug 92586 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested
allocatable derived types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eb2f102d38697011d3069fac759b7c6e149bed4
commit r13-7834-g9eb2f102d38697011d3069fac759b7c6e149bed4
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 68155, which changed state.
Bug 68155 Summary: ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <>
len_rhs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c1925ece0193058120e94614e99360e9600777e
commit r13-7833-g8c1925ece0193058120e94614e99360e9600777e
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108575
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111573
Bug ID: 111573
Summary: lambda functions often not inlined and optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
Bug ID: 111572
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104940
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
https://github.com/kristerw/pysmtgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571
Bug ID: 111571
Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at
ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104940
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
See also:
https://kristerw.github.io/2022/11/01/verifying-optimizations/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108575
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Tosis ---
We found the problem, the bug was in Embedded Ecoder from Mathworks.
So the Coder has generated wrong C Code.
Thank you all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111570
Bug ID: 111570
Summary: -march=generic prints error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569
Bug ID: 111569
Summary: Problem finding in Library functions with parametres:
32, 8 , 32 Bits
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
Let me report another issue I observed on this PR.
According to [range.adaptor.object], adaptor(args...) uses
std::forward(args).. . to forward arguments into the call
wrapper's decayed member, whereas libstdc++ u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111568
Bug ID: 111568
Summary: std::not_fn can accept non-movable function
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But the code is "ill-formed, no diagnostic required" and GCC is now being more
helpful by diagnosing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> So clang most likely thinks b.t and c->t are still type depedent even though
> they don't need to be ...
Which is fine. It's QoI whether non-dependent error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I think all four bugs related to adaptor closures are very similar and could
> be a single bug report.
Perhaps. Maybe I should collect them all. Sorry for bringing up b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think all four bugs related to adaptor closures are very similar and could be
a single bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111567
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
This PR tracks adding support for the attribute to -fanalyzer (which I can take
a look at).
Adding the attribute itself is tracked by PR 108896.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111559
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111567
Bug ID: 111567
Summary: RFE: support counted_by in analyzer
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111546
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:deb844c67f1e2b116518f9742a6acbe6f19ea28f
commit r14-4243-gdeb844c67f1e2b116518f9742a6acbe6f19ea28f
Author: Pan Li
Date: Sun Sep 24 11:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Note that as said in PR111560 comment 6, re-association may break CSE, e.g. if
there are also a + b + d and a + c + e with my example. So, re-association for
global optimal CSE, in addition to being diffic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111559
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
Bug ID: 111566
Summary: RISC-V Vector Fortran: ICE in final_scan_insn_1 (final
RTL pass)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111271
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
