https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> That revision seems good. Trying 7450b25566b7a738.
Seems good. Trying 512098a3316f07d4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
That revision seems good. Trying 7450b25566b7a738.
For the reduced code, -march=zen3 not required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
There used to be a warning for this. Even saw someone post an updated version
of it that happens on gimple (but that never went in).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/program/setjmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117
Bug ID: 108117
Summary: Wrong instruction scheduling on value coming from
abnormal SSA
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108096
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ef521bbc63f8a3883d507a8b6c1f95f442df3fe
commit r13-4712-g4ef521bbc63f8a3883d507a8b6c1f95f442df3fe
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ef521bbc63f8a3883d507a8b6c1f95f442df3fe
commit r13-4712-g4ef521bbc63f8a3883d507a8b6c1f95f442df3fe
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Git bisect now running. Trying 15f04af347e3b65f.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116
m101010a at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54098|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116
Bug ID: 108116
Summary: internal compiler error: in check_noexcept_r, at
cp/except.cc:1074
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104075
Bug 104075 depends on bug 108115, which changed state.
Bug 108115 Summary: spurious pointer used after realloc warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108115
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108115
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104075
Bug 104075 depends on bug 108115, which changed state.
Bug 108115 Summary: spurious pointer used after realloc warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108115
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@develop-help.com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108115
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108115
Bug ID: 108115
Summary: spurious pointer used after realloc warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
namespace std {
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr int value = __v;
};
using true_type = integral_constant;
using false_type = integral_constant;
templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhiès from comment #1)
> I'll need to read a bit more about the 8 (default move assignment op being
> deleted).
Lexer has this member:
buffered_queue input_queue;
That has a membe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111
--- Comment #1 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Hello David,
Looking at the errors, most of them are trivial to fix.
1-6: missing 'override'.
9: not present in most recent dev branch on github, can be ignored as it will
disappear when we update the gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108065
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE in |[13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108065
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41faa1d7beb90b235858c8a692be926642ad5559
commit r13-4710-g41faa1d7beb90b235858c8a692be926642ad5559
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Setting a breakpoint in gfc_resolve_pack, I find for the len=: case:
(gdb) p *array->ts.u.cl
$12 = {length = 0x0, next = 0x2cc7af0, length_from_typespec = false,
backend_decl = 0x0,
passed_leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 54096
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54096&action=edit
valgrind output.
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Is this attached file to be preprocessed? Or does it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The dump tree shows near the pack intrinsic:
- for character(len=10):
atmp.4.dtype = {.elem_len=10, .rank=1, .type=6};
atmp.4.span = 10;
atmp.4.data = 0B;
atmp.4.offset = 0;
_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108114
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Gawain Bolton from comment #0)
> From my understanding of the C++20 standard (cf.
> https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init.general#nt:brace-or-equal-initializer)
> this code attached is valid since a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108114
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang gives:
:11:19: warning: mixture of designated and non-designated initializers
in the same initializer list is a C99 extension [-Wc99-designator]
B b{{.a = 0}, .b = 1};
^~
:11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108114
Bug ID: 108114
Summary: Designated initialization of parent class results in
error in C++20 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107537
--- Comment #4 from michael.foerderer at gmx dot de ---
This is my first patch, I hope that I did it right:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608512.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113
Marc Poulhiès changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dkm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113
Bug ID: 108113
Summary: Rust and --enable-link-serialization=1
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36406
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-14
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10 Regression] fortran -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|Quadratic error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108112
Bug ID: 108112
Summary: ICE on explicit instantiation of template member
operator delete
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is this attached file to be preprocessed? Or does it need special options?
Can't reproduce here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another question is what with this tolerated extension happens when the typedef
is unsigned.
// PR c++/108099
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-options "" }
typedef unsigned long long t64;
usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111
Bug ID: 108111
Summary: Rust meets clang
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely one of the following revisions ranges caused the issue:
r13-4705 - r13-4706
r13-4684 - r13-4691
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Summary|ice in modify_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
CPU is AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, so -march flag is zen3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, on
// PR c++/108099
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-options "" }
using u128 = unsigned __int128_t;
using s128 = signed __int128_t;
template struct integral_constant {
static constex
^
0xe33c71 ipa_param_adjustments::modify_call(cgraph_edge*, bool)
../../trunk.d1/gcc/ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700
I have a reduction running. Problem seems to be recent (today or yesterday).
Command line is
$ ~/gcc/results.20221214.asan.ubsan/bin/g++ -c -march=native -std=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is definitely a pointer to member function issue.
I tried with just a pointer to a function and it worked and even a pointer to a
member field works too:
```
struct ss {
int t;
};
template struct Fre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108108
--- Comment #4 from M Welinder ---
> Since it was not read again, the file is not considered included ...
It must have been read -- how else could gcc decide it was the same?
# strace -f gcc -MM c.c 2>&1 >Makefile | grep 'open.*\.h' | grep -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109
Bug ID: 108109
Summary: [ICE] gfortran compilation fails calling 'free()' with
'malloc(): mismatching next->prev_size (unsorted)'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f7aa145b796c044526c93f390e68f3b56a1b30a
commit r13-4708-g4f7aa145b796c044526c93f390e68f3b56a1b30a
Author: David Faust
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70b303049e45c180236a4114f844311652bad002
commit r13-4709-g70b303049e45c180236a4114f844311652bad002
Author: David Faust
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bce22e88e1c8486a0f2d42311506a8d3da20fb7
commit r13-4707-g2bce22e88e1c8486a0f2d42311506a8d3da20fb7
Author: David Faust
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108108
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Really #pragma once should just emit a warning just like #import does ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108108
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
From: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/cpp/Pragmas.html#Pragmas
"that file will never be read again, no matter what."
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/gcc/Preprocessor-Options.html#index-M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |preprocessor
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108108
Bug ID: 108108
Summary: "gcc -MM" fails to list all dependencies
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I forgot to mention we do reject:
```
typedef signed __int128_t t;
```
already too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095
--- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 54090 [details]
> gcc13-pr108095.patch
Compiler builds for me and the ICE went away for all affected Linux
configurations. Though I canno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when parsing signed |ICE with type alias with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101834
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I never build in the source tree. I use distclean a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108107
Bug ID: 108107
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc print sstream
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
Bug ID: 108106
Summary: [13 Regression] /usr/bin/ld:
.libs/hwasan_setjmp_x86_64.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32
against symbol `__interceptor_sigsetjmp' can not be
use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108105
Bug ID: 108105
Summary: std::is_sorted(std::execution::par, ...) giving
incorrect result
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104
Bug ID: 108104
Summary: ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:24333 with template partial
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101834
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu, |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108103
Bug ID: 108103
Summary: c++tools remains after make distclean
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Component: rust
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org, gcc-rust at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20221214 on s390x-linux-gnu:
make[5]: Leaving directory '/<>/build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107231
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108038
--- Comment #1 from Raphael M Zinsly ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #0)
> testGT:
> sgt a0,a0,a1# 25[c=4 l=4] *sgt_didi
> xoria0,a0,1 # 27[c=4 l=4] xordi3/1
> addia0,a0,2 # 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107633
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Version|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108028
--- Comment #3 from ming mengli ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Thanks for filing this bug.
>
> There are several things going on here.
>
> (A): the analyzer is considering the function "f" as called standalone, as
> well as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095
--- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
I'll give that patch a spin, build the cross-compilers and try to build the
affected Linux configurations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Arthur Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107633
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
FYI: Still occurs in 12.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108097
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108097
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9d58614b0b8eebd64d568fa22cd31faaa5f8dce
commit r12-8985-ge9d58614b0b8eebd64d568fa22cd31faaa5f8dce
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108097
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107214
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Julian Brown :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:330b9a8d87dd73e10539da618496ad4964fee26d
commit r13-4703-g330b9a8d87dd73e10539da618496ad4964fee26d
Author: Julian Brown
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108097
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:881c6cabce5d0b27285ed41bd6dabdf48848cce7
commit r13-4701-g881c6cabce5d0b27285ed41bd6dabdf48848cce7
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107988
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107988
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c2451ba4601739654e2ea4907d6fa2a00d660aa
commit r13-4699-g8c2451ba4601739654e2ea4907d6fa2a00d660aa
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107537
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Hello. Sorry for the delay.
> Is there any reason why gcov skips throw/fallthrough annotations for
> branches which were never executed?
No. Your patch is fine and pre-approved, please include the PR entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107633
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |
Build|i386-pc-solaris2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52566
--- Comment #5 from M Welinder ---
>From 108101:
Note also:
# gcc -MM c.c
c.o: c.c a.h
No b.h present!
I.e., Makefiles built with this will not pick up changes to the second file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108101
--- Comment #3 from M Welinder ---
Note also:
# gcc -MM c.c
c.o: c.c a.h
No b.h present!
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
