[Bug c/107405] enums can be wrongly long in gcc-13 (in gnu99)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/105668] [13 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O -ftracer -fno-tree-fre since r13-458-gd75d4293dcc029a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105668 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/107404] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r12-6416-g037cc0b4a6646cc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/107404] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r12-6416-g037cc0b4a6646cc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #22 from Ulrich Weigand --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. For s390x see here: https://github.com/IBM/s390x-abi

[Bug rtl-optimization/88132] Compile time and memory hog w/ var-tracking on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88132 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/107406] New: lock_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107406 Bug ID: 107406 Summary: lock_type Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassign

[Bug c/107405] enums can be wrongly long in gcc-13 (in gnu99)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Slaby --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #0) > Reduced testcase: > #include > enum { A = 0x, B = 1 << 31, }; > int main() { printf("%lx %x %zu\n", A, B, sizeof(B)); } It's also interesting to me, that A i

[Bug c/107405] New: enums can be long in gcc-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405 Bug ID: 107405 Summary: enums can be long in gcc-13 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug target/106460] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand on -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106460 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:978ec4825c2e5cb0ec03d857ea038440d566ff42 commit r13-3499-g978ec4825c2e5cb0ec03d857ea038440d566ff42 Author: Jiufu Guo Date: Tue Jul

[Bug c++/95148] -Wtype-limits always-false warning triggered despite comparison being avoided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95148 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/107057] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107057 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5) > I'm testing > > modified gcc/lra-constraints.cc > @@ -4382,7 +4382,14 @@ curr_insn_transform (bool check_only_p) >(op, (enum reg_class) goal_alt[i

[Bug tree-optimization/107404] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107404] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3

[Bug tree-optimization/107404] New: [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3

g++ -O3 small.cpp && ./a.out 28 >$ g++ -O0 small.cpp && ./a.out 0 gcc version 13.0.0 20221025 (321f89e58510dd5df1b3dbe323344b987a7b11c6)

[Bug tree-optimization/105668] [13 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O -ftracer -fno-tree-fre since r13-458-gd75d4293dcc029a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105668 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks to be fixed.

[Bug target/107403] uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107403 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00192.html

[Bug target/107403] uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107403 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/107403] uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107403 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note gcc and clang have different implementation defined behavior here too.

[Bug target/107403] uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107403 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No this is correct. i.y << 8ULL Is all done in 56bit type as the type is greater than the size of int. Note c allows this behavior while c++ does not.

[Bug target/107403] New: uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107403 Bug ID: 107403 Summary: uint64_t bitfield operation is mishandled Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/105723] [12/13 Regression] Optimization false positive warning (-Wstringop-overflow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105723 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Optimization false positive |[12/13 Regression] |w

[Bug c++/105725] [ICE] segfault with `-Wmismatched-tags`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105725 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.4

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. > > >

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > Steve, > > what do you think about the following patch? Not yet fully regtested. > It should fix the issue much simpler by checking type compatibility: >

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. > > >

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. > > Does what? Published psABI which ought to specify how to

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. > > Does what? Have a public place to submit issues against

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- See: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/merge_requests/38

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > PowerPC I think does, not sure about s390. Does what?

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 since r13-3411-gf4fda3eec408e1eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 since r13-3411-gf4fda3eec408e1eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 53772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53772&action=edit untested

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 since r13-3411-gf4fda3eec408e1eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- This is interesting. quux() was analyzed and a global range was set that included the possibility of +NAN, but when it was inlined into bar(), the assert making sure no NANs crept in for -ffinite-math-on

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #13) > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/issues/5 to request such an ABI > for 32-bit x86. I don't know if there are other psABIs with public issue > tr

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > The x86-64 psABI has been changed for this: > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/8ca45392570e96920f8a15d9

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/107388] GCC should diagnose unsigned to signed conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107388 --- Comment #2 from Nikolas Klauser --- Shouldn't -Wconversion also enable -Wsign-conversion? -Wconversion sounds to me like it should diagnose all conversions, especially since it's the same kind of bug I want to catch by enabling the flags. In

[Bug tree-optimization/107395] Missed warning opportunity on builtin string optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395 --- Comment #2 from nrk at disroot dot org --- That c++ warning is unrelated to the bug report, it's warning about initialization; which you can easily replace them with { 'h' } and { 'h', 'i' } to silence; but not warning about the fact that non

[Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130 --- Comment #8 from Martin Storsjö --- (In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #7) > I sent an updated version for the trunk, 12, 11 and 10 to the gcc-patches > mailing list in May: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/594960.

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 since r13-3411-gf4fda3eec408e1eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/107395] Missed warning opportunity on builtin string optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/103474] ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103474 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another part which is needed to avoid an ice-on-valid code: (Note F2018:5.4.7(5): A subobject of a coarray is a coarray if ...) diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc index 69d0b5

[Bug c++/107390] template-nested lambda type uniqueness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107390 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107382] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_common_type, at cp/typeck.cc:436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107382 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/107383] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_build_binary_op, at cp/typeck.cc:6181

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107383 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 107382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/107383] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_build_binary_op, at cp/typeck.cc:6181

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107383 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Monakov --- As for the Fortran testcases, the issue is again caused by the front-end invoking decl_default_tls_model before assigning DECL_COMMON, this time in fortran/trans-common.cc:build_common_decl. So I guess

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 106848, which changed state. Bug 106848 Summary: ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error: type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848 What|R

[Bug c++/106848] ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error: type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/106852] Implement C++23 P2465R3 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852 Bug 106852 depends on bug 106848, which changed state. Bug 106848 Summary: ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error: type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848 What|R

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 102600, which changed state. Bug 102600 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 Bug 99227 depends on bug 102600, which changed state. Bug 102600 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/102600] [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Tar

[Bug c++/107402] New: Parenthesized aggregate initialization should not initialize references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107402 Bug ID: 107402 Summary: Parenthesized aggregate initialization should not initialize references Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/102600] [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15d67c11ac0479b08e3badcafdee7e0a6f062349 commit r13-3491-g15d67c11ac0479b08e3badcafdee7e0a6f062349 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/106848] ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error: type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15d67c11ac0479b08e3badcafdee7e0a6f062349 commit r13-3491-g15d67c11ac0479b08e3badcafdee7e0a6f062349 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 13 so far.

[Bug c++/107401] New: ICE in get_originating_module_decl, at cp/module.cc:18587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107401 Bug ID: 107401 Summary: ICE in get_originating_module_decl, at cp/module.cc:18587 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/107400] New: ICE tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration' (template_decl) in get_originating_module_decl, at cp/module.cc:18587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107400 Bug ID: 107400 Summary: ICE tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration' (template_decl) in get_originating_module_decl, at cp/module.cc:18587 Product: gcc

[Bug c++/107399] New: ICE in cpp_maybe_module_directive, at libcpp/lex.cc:3454

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107399 Bug ID: 107399 Summary: ICE in cpp_maybe_module_directive, at libcpp/lex.cc:3454 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/107304] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c64aba8cdf6509533f554ad86640f274cdbe37f commit r13-3490-g1c64aba8cdf6509533f554ad86640f274cdbe37f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Oct 19 1

[Bug target/78643] [6 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c64aba8cdf6509533f554ad86640f274cdbe37f commit r13-3490-g1c64aba8cdf6509533f554ad86640f274cdbe37f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Oct 19 12

[Bug c++/107398] New: ICE in maybe_key_decl, at cp/module.cc:18834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107398 Bug ID: 107398 Summary: ICE in maybe_key_decl, at cp/module.cc:18834 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/107397] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 Bug ID: 107397 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/107396] New: [12 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396 Bug ID: 107396 Summary: [12 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 13.

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Kalibera --- I sent an updated version for the trunk, 12, 11 and 10 to the gcc-patches mailing list in May: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/594960.html The patches still apply to current 10,11,12 and

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Monakov --- ICE on the emutls-3.c testcase isn't related to emutls. Rather, the frontend invokes decl_default_tls_model before attributes are processed, so the first time around we miss the 'common' attribute when

[Bug tree-optimization/107395] New: Missed warning opportunity on bultin string optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395 Bug ID: 107395 Summary: Missed warning opportunity on bultin string optimization Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/85944] Address of temporary bound to a function parameter at global scope not considered constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85944 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm afraid the middle-end can't do here much. maybe_nonzero_address handles file scope vars (vars in symbol table) and automatic vars, but for the TARGET_EXPR temporaries created by force_target_expr -> build

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] New: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 Bug ID: 107394 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > The x86-64 psABI has been changed for this: > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/ > 8ca45392570e96920f8a15d903d6122f6d263cd0 > but the state of the pa

[Bug c/107389] Alignment not inferred from type at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson --- If __builtin_assume_aligned were to work at -O0, that would also work for me. Better, probably, than fiddling with __attribute__((aligned)).

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov --- I've broken out the C++ issue from comment #10 as PR 107393, thanks for the testcase. It's a separate issue from emutls and Fortran ICEs on other targets.

[Bug c++/107393] New: Wrong TLS model for specialized template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107393 Bug ID: 107393 Summary: Wrong TLS model for specialized template Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/107389] Alignment not inferred from type at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, with typedef __uint128_t aligned_type __attribute__((aligned(16))); _Static_assert(__alignof(aligned_type) == 16); __uint128_t foo(aligned_type *p) { p = __builtin_assume_aligned (p, 16); return __ato

[Bug libstdc++/95048] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wstring-constructor of std::filesystem::path throws for non-ASCII characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048 --- Comment #17 from Ulf Lorenz --- Your point was an item during implementation. Besides the other cases being rare and probably exotic, the killer argument was that it would be way more complex. While I am confident now that I can move around t

[Bug c/107389] Alignment not inferred from type at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC

[Bug middle-end/50481] builtin to reverse the bit order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481 Carlo Wood changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fro

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/107316] [aarch64] Init big const value should be improved compare to llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107316 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/107316] [aarch64] Init big const value should be improved compare to llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107316 Bug 107316 depends on bug 106583, which changed state. Bug 106583 Summary: Suboptimal immediate generation on aarch64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106583 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/106583] Suboptimal immediate generation on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106583 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Lance Fredrickson from comment #0) > Thread 2 "ld.lld" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to LWP 27688] > 0x42deada0 in > std::condition_variable::wait(std::unique_lock&

[Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- We're missing a proper testcase. Is the buggy lld binary linked by lld, or binutils? Maybe there's a bug in handling of ELF symbol versioning.

[Bug libstdc++/95048] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wstring-constructor of std::filesystem::path throws for non-ASCII characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks. As per https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html patches for libstdc++ need to be CC'd to the libstdc++ list, but I'll find it in the gcc-patches archive and review it ASAP. I'm still concerned that this jus

[Bug ada/107392] New: excessive compilation time for decimal_literal - that should be rejected as type-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107392 Bug ID: 107392 Summary: excessive compilation time for decimal_literal - that should be rejected as type-error Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r7-2012-g43aabfcfd4139e4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] Wrong

[Bug middle-end/42512] [4.5 Regression] integer wrong code bug with loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42512 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf commit r13-3486-g4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/66375] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf commit r13-3486-g4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r7-2012-g43aabfcfd4139e4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf commit r13-3486-g4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ada/107391] New: decimal_literal with long exponent: Constraint_Error uintp.adb:2287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107391 Bug ID: 107391 Summary: decimal_literal with long exponent: Constraint_Error uintp.adb:2287 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/106644] [C++23] P2468R2 - The Equality Operator You Are Looking For

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53770 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53770&action=edit gcc13-pr106644-wip.patch Untested WIP. Compared to vanilla trunk, this rejects the f2 case which is a2 from th

[Bug middle-end/106208] [12/13 Regression] ICE in branch_prob, at profile.cc:1459 since r12-5275-gbcebd05720540e25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug debug/101598] [debug, ada] .loc generated for defs__struct1IP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101598 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da1f6e5260dbcce59372cb522e1af763f25eed6b commit r12-8866-gda1f6e5260dbcce59372cb522e1af763f25eed6b Author: Eric Botcazou

  1   2   >