https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=101598
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This ICE (when compiling with '-ftest-coverage -fcoarray=lib') reported here
originally: 'gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90' as well as Martin's reduced
test case 'reg.f90' disappears via Eric's PR101598-related commit
r13-3485-gcb21297f9259ceedd5f5dd7c3973535f14124d6d "Relax assertion in
profiler".

Should we still add these Fortran test cases -- or is in fact 'gfortran' still
generating "undesirable" location information?  Stated by Eric: "This assertion
in branch_prob [...] had been correct until the fix for PR debug/101598 was
installed", but that clearly doesn't apply to the Fortran case discussed in
this PR, as Bernd's commit r12-2846-ga45918f8a7444a40eb397a037683ba5900a2db74
"Ada: Remove debug line number for DECL_IGNORED_P functions" was relevant for
Ada only; 'gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c'.

Reply via email to