https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105965
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105965
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106019
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2)
> Created attachment 53172 [details]
> Candidate patch
>
> Huh, yeah, surprising this has been present so long.
>
> Running aff_combination_expand on off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Build|x86_64-linu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> Created attachment 53169 [details]
> A patch
>
> This patch multiplies the vector store cost by the number of scalar elements
> in
> a word to properly compare scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106042
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
https://godbolt.org/z/bfeq935b6
https://godbolt.org/z/MjKsTPPfP
clang has exactly the same behavior for x86_64-windows-gnu and
x86_64-windows-msvc (only name mangling is different.) However
x86_64-windows-gnu i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106042
Bug ID: 106042
Summary: std::__once_call abi umatch for clang and gcc on
windows targets
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105875
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang/LLVM produces the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #3 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Long/infinite compile time |infinite loop in fast_dce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106041
Bug ID: 106041
Summary: Long/infinite compile time for Arm SIMD -O1 or -O2 but
not -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105918
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Spurious Warray-bounds in |[12/13 Regression] Spurious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #3 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 6.1.0, 9.1.0
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Leffler ---
I got an email from pinskia — thank you. I responded from an iPhone and got a
message back about 'HTML attachments are not allowed'. I'm not sure if that
got through. Anyway, what I said (tried to say)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740
--- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Run if_to_switch and convert_switch again after copyprop2 could remove the
redundant statement and expose opportunity for if-to-switch again, is this
reasonable or just move if-to-switch/switch-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105864
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
A testcase where not doing the storing would might give wrong code:
using nullptr_t = decltype(nullptr);
[[gnu::noipa]]
void test(nullptr_t* p)
{
*p = nullptr;
}
int main(void)
{
nullptr_t t, t1 = n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105941
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99719
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the issue is [[gnu::sysv_abi]] really. It is a known issue with
x86_64-mingw and cygwin64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unlvsur at live dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99719
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikulas at artax dot
karlin.mff.cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105955
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Thank you for looking at this.
In the second and subsequent errors, the line number of the macro is used
in all three lines of the error report, whereas in the first, the second
line of the messages is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 12.1.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Bug ID: 106040
Summary: gcc reports error in aggregate when member has
explicit constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see an issue with the diagnostic here really.
For the single line case (without the format as a macro):
printf("%-21s %-16x %-16x %-18s %-18s\n", "GHI", (intptr_t) val1,
(intptr_t) val1, "ABC",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 53178
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53178&action=edit
Output from gcc -v when compiling the test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 53177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53177&action=edit
Close to minimal source (4 format strings; 4 printf statements; some comments)
Close to minimal source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
Bug ID: 106039
Summary: Inconsistent error reporting for printf() when format
string is a macro
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
--- Comment #3 from Egor Pugin ---
See ms response
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/C-Wrong-requires-result-inside-lambd/10073268#T-N10075675
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang prints x also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #2 from Noah Goldstein ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Created attachment 53175 [details]
> Testcase -O3 -march=icelake-client
>
> Next time attach the testcase and not link to godbolt without a testcase.
Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53175&action=edit
Testcase -O3 -march=icelake-client
Next time attach the testcase and not link to godbolt without a testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
Bug ID: 106038
Summary: x86_64 vectorization of ALU ops using xmm registers
prematurely
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on missing template |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106037
Bug ID: 106037
Summary: ICE with Aggregate aspect
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
Bug ID: 106036
Summary: Missing stdint.h include in libgcc/libgcov.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105964
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105908
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94cf9bfb4d269fa5a4e3eeda45f4eafe392bfd58
commit r10-10861-g94cf9bfb4d269fa5a4e3eeda45f4eafe392bfd58
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:380829dfd9d8a602322a7771f94616056ebbde21
commit r11-10085-g380829dfd9d8a602322a7771f94616056ebbde21
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d87e0e297b1cba73a0c055d2a3e9267d288f435a
commit r11-10084-gd87e0e297b1cba73a0c055d2a3e9267d288f435a
Author: Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:570a6067ff6928fe76bb13cece38346d9a966a13
commit r10-10860-g570a6067ff6928fe76bb13cece38346d9a966a13
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alt...@arts-union.ru
--- Comment #17 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45184
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3885 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j at uriah dot heep.sax.de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Pavel M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58465d673bb21fc234f642166ec0cf9e621787c3
commit r10-10859-g58465d673bb21fc234f642166ec0cf9e621787c3
Author: Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84fe5ace4734cb0eeb342114e744455a7178b0e2
commit r11-10082-g84fe5ace4734cb0eeb342114e744455a7178b0e2
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106029
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106029
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8fc8a6ff7a6996fb7f12338c45d1c3450b7a397
commit r12-8499-gf8fc8a6ff7a6996fb7f12338c45d1c3450b7a397
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106016
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #10 from Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are some more errors further along in the test case that appear related:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-ieee-bootstrap/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/home/seurer/gcc/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddc9b963ab9f267e8cc54be1fa6fcca2e8b0eb84
commit r12-8498-gddc9b963ab9f267e8cc54be1fa6fcca2e8b0eb84
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 53173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53173&action=edit
Potential patch
I haven't been able to recreate the problem, but does this patch fix it?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106035
Bug ID: 106035
Summary: F2018 allows an IMPORT statement within the BLOCK
construct.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69200
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
Bug ID: 106034
Summary: internal compiler error: in type_node, at
cp/module.cc:8736 using --with-long-double-format=ieee
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105835
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106019
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 53171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53171&action=edit
The v2 patch
Handle vector store.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe9765c0b97e6b4ce2cd226631d329fc05ba2aa5
commit r13-1180-gfe9765c0b97e6b4ce2cd226631d329fc05ba2aa5
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jun 14 08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This one seems to be very old:
__attribute__((noipa, noinline, noclone)) int
foo (int x, int *y)
{
int a = 0;
if (x < 0)
a = *y;
return a;
}
int
main ()
{
int a = 42;
if (foo (0, 0) != 0 ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Around 22,000 executions of csmith per 24 hours and feeding the results
to trunk gcc are proving their value in flushing out bugs in gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Still it is latent on the release branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|ice in emit_move_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Started with r13-673-gd863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c :
commit d863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu May 19 17:54:38 2022 +0100
PR middle-end/98865: Expand X*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 53169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53169&action=edit
A patch
This patch multiplies the vector store cost by the number of scalar elements in
a word to properly compare s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Known to fail|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713f2fd923442b1be620a44240ddf786ae0ab476
commit r13-1174-g713f2fd923442b1be620a44240ddf786ae0ab476
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105956
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
And I reduced to the pretty same code snippet as Marek did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105940
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86882d9feb6a534325d7162216696266898e36d0
commit r13-1173-g86882d9feb6a534325d7162216696266898e36d0
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jun 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> We already put the const_vector into the constant pool at RTL expansion time,
> possibly because the move patterns do not allow vector constants fitting into
> {S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Deobfuscated:
int a, b, c;
char
foo (int x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
void
bar (void)
{
char d = (foo <= b) * a;
c = foo (2 != bar, d);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue seems to be that
#4 0x00f82be3 in fold_binary_loc (loc=2147483656,
code=TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR, type=,
op0=, op1=)
at /space/rguenther/src/gcc/gcc/fold-const.cc:12044
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
T
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo