https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > Created attachment 53169 [details] > A patch > > This patch multiplies the vector store cost by the number of scalar elements > in > a word to properly compare scalar store cost against vector store cost. But that's not "properly" but "wrong" ... Note we already cost the vector load from the constant pool so the vector side costing is correct. What's eventually imprecise is the scalar cost where you could anticipate store merging, but adjusting the vector cost side is just wrong.
